91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23887162)
1. Equivocal or ambiguous terminologies in pathology: focus of continuous quality improvement?
Idowu MO; Wiles A; Wan W; Wilkinson DS; Powers CN
Am J Surg Pathol; 2013 Nov; 37(11):1722-7. PubMed ID: 23887162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Communicating uncertainty in pathology reports: a descriptive study from a specialized cancer center.
Jaber O; Ammar K; Sughayer M
Acad Pathol; 2024; 11(1):100109. PubMed ID: 38433775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Modifying phrases in surgical pathology reports: introduction of Standardized Scheme of Reporting Certainty in Pathology Reports (SSRC-Path).
Amin A; DeLellis RA; Fava JL
Virchows Arch; 2021 Nov; 479(5):1021-1029. PubMed ID: 34272982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Peer review procedures in pathology - more than ten years of experience in the free state of Saxony].
Eberlein-Gonska M; Baretton G; Habeck JO
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2012; 106(8):571-8. PubMed ID: 23084863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Representation of ophthalmology concepts by electronic systems: intercoder agreement among physicians using controlled terminologies.
Hwang JC; Yu AC; Casper DS; Starren J; Cimino JJ; Chiang MF
Ophthalmology; 2006 Apr; 113(4):511-9. PubMed ID: 16488013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A quality improvement model for healthcare terminologies.
Kim TY; Coenen A; Hardiker N
J Biomed Inform; 2010 Dec; 43(6):1036-43. PubMed ID: 20723616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How "consistent" is "consistent"? A clinician-based assessment of the reliability of expressions used by radiologists to communicate diagnostic confidence.
Rosenkrantz AB; Kiritsy M; Kim S
Clin Radiol; 2014 Jul; 69(7):745-9. PubMed ID: 24836524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differing Interpretations of Report Terminology Between Primary Care Physicians and Radiologists.
Gunn AJ; Tuttle MC; Flores EJ; Mangano MD; Bennett SE; Sahani DV; Choy G; Boland GW
J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Dec; 13(12 Pt A):1525-1529.e1. PubMed ID: 27595196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Unexpected expectations in critical values in anatomic pathology: improving agreement between pathologists and nonpathologists with the treatable immediately, life-threatening terminology.
Renshaw SA; Gould EW; Renshaw AA
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2011 Nov; 135(11):1391-3. PubMed ID: 22032563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mammographically directed breast biopsies: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of clinical physician expectations and of specimen handling and reporting characteristics in 434 institutions.
Nakhleh RE; Jones B; Zarbo RJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Jan; 121(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 9111087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Critical values in surgical pathology.
Pereira TC; Liu Y; Silverman JF
Am J Clin Pathol; 2004 Aug; 122(2):201-5. PubMed ID: 15323136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Statistical Literacy Among Academic Pathologists: A Survey Study to Gauge Knowledge of Frequently Used Statistical Tests Among Trainees and Faculty.
Schmidt RL; Chute DJ; Colbert-Getz JM; Firpo-Betancourt A; James DS; Karp JK; Miller DC; Milner DA; Smock KJ; Sutton AT; Walker BS; White KL; Wilson AR; Wojcik EM; Yared MA; Factor RE
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2017 Feb; 141(2):279-287. PubMed ID: 27959584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Communicating diagnostic uncertainty in surgical pathology reports: disparities between sender and receiver.
Lindley SW; Gillies EM; Hassell LA
Pathol Res Pract; 2014 Oct; 210(10):628-33. PubMed ID: 24939143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Communicating Certainty in Pathology Reports.
Gibson BA; McKinnon E; Bentley RC; Mohlman J; Witt BL; Yang EJ; Geisler D; DeFrances M
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2022 Jul; 146(7):886-893. PubMed ID: 34669920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quality in surgical pathology communication and reporting.
Nakhleh RE
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2011 Nov; 135(11):1394-7. PubMed ID: 22032564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cross-mapping between three terminologies with the international standard nursing reference terminology model.
Goossen W
Int J Nurs Terminol Classif; 2006; 17(4):153-64. PubMed ID: 17117945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Functional requirements of terminology services for coupling interface terminologies to reference terminologies.
Daniel C; Buemi A; Mazuel L; Ouagne D; Charlet J
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2009; 150():205-9. PubMed ID: 19745298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interface terminologies: bridging the gap between theory and reality for Africa.
Kanter AS; Wang AY; Masarie FE; Naeymi-Rad F; Safran C
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 136():27-32. PubMed ID: 18487703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Non-neoplastic epithelial alterations of the vulva: recognition assessment and comparisons of terminologies used among the various specialties.
Ambros RA; Malfetano JH; Carlson JA; Mihm MC
Mod Pathol; 1997 May; 10(5):401-8. PubMed ID: 9160302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Terminology and classification problems in relation to vulvar pathology].
Micheletti L; Nicolaci P; Barbero M; Zanotto Valentino MC; Preti M
Minerva Ginecol; 1995 Jun; 47(6):269-75. PubMed ID: 7478097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
