These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23887271)

  • 1. A comparative assessment of entrance surface doses in analogue and digital radiography during common radiographic examinations.
    Seo D; Jang S; Kim J; Kim J; Sung D; Kim H; Yoon Y
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Jan; 158(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 23887271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimating pediatric entrance skin dose from digital radiography examination using DICOM metadata: A quality assurance tool.
    Brady SL; Kaufman RA
    Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2489-97. PubMed ID: 25979042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiation dose in digital chest radiography: comparison among three technologies.
    Saiani F; Ghirardi C; Rodella CA; Feroldi P; Chiesa A
    Radiol Med; 2004 Apr; 107(4):401-7. PubMed ID: 15103291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Increasing source-to-image distance to reduce radiation dose from digital radiography pelvic examinations.
    England A; Evans P; Harding L; Taylor EM; Charnock P; Williams G
    Radiol Technol; 2015; 86(3):246-56. PubMed ID: 25739106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Image quality assessment and radiation doses in intraoral radiography.
    Yakoumakis EN; Tierris CE; Stefanou EP; Phanourakis IG; Proukakis CC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Mar; 91(3):362-8. PubMed ID: 11250637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of radiation doses to patients undergoing standard radiographic examinations with conventional screen-film radiography, computed radiography and direct digital radiography.
    Compagnone G; Baleni MC; Pagan L; Calzolaio FL; Barozzi L; Bergamini C
    Br J Radiol; 2006 Nov; 79(947):899-904. PubMed ID: 17065288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does digital acquisition reduce patients' skin dose in cardiac interventional procedures? An experimental study.
    Chida K; Saito H; Zuguchi M; Shirotori K; Kumagai S; Nakayama H; Matsubara K; Kohzuki M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Oct; 183(4):1111-4. PubMed ID: 15385315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [A study of entrance surface dose with CR and film/screen systems, and analysis of the X-ray conditions for chest radiography].
    Mori T; Muto H
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 2000 Dec; 60(14):863-7. PubMed ID: 11197837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patient dose in digital projection radiography.
    Compagnone G; Pagan L; Baleni MC; Calzolaio FL; Barozzi L; Bergamini C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):135-7. PubMed ID: 18252850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [A study of optimum radiographic conditions on chest examinations with computed radiology (CR) in conjunction with the offset balance of patient dose and image quality].
    Muto H; Mori T; Hayakawa H
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 2001 May; 61(6):303-9. PubMed ID: 11431936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [CR (Computed Radiography)].
    Matsumoto M
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(2):110-7. PubMed ID: 12766288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of entrance surface doses of some X ray examinations with CEC reference doses.
    Ogunseyinde AO; Adeniran SA; Obed RI; Akinlade BI; Ogundare FO
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2002; 98(2):231-4. PubMed ID: 11930883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reference dose levels for dental panoramic radiography in Gwangju, South Korea.
    Lee JS; Kim YH; Yoon SJ; Kang BC
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Dec; 142(2-4):184-90. PubMed ID: 20702464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of analogue and digital techniques in upper gastrointestinal examinations: absorbed dose and diagnostic quality of the images.
    Axelsson B; Bodén K; Fransson SG; Hansson IB; Persliden J; Witt HH
    Eur Radiol; 2000; 10(8):1351-4. PubMed ID: 10939506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digital chest radiography system with amorphous selenium flat-panel detectors: Qualitative and dosimetric comparison with a dedicated film-screen system.
    Prato A; Ropolo R; Fava C
    Radiol Med; 2005; 110(5-6):561-73. PubMed ID: 16437042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Retrospective patient dose analysis of Ghana's first direct digital radiography system.
    Inkoom S; Togobo J; Emi-Reynolds G; Oddoye A; Ntiri TO; Gyekye PK
    Health Phys; 2012 Aug; 103(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 22739831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Local diagnostic reference levels for typical radiographic procedures.
    Tonkopi E; Daniels C; Gale MJ; Schofield SC; Sorhaindo VA; Vanlarkin JL
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2012 Nov; 63(4):237-41. PubMed ID: 22136965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality assurance of computed and digital radiography systems.
    Walsh C; Gorman D; Byrne P; Larkin A; Dowling A; Malone JF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):271-5. PubMed ID: 18319281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Dosimetric evaluations in dental radiology: comparison of the digital system and the conventional system].
    Blanc M; Nessi R; Paruccini N; Castellana L
    Radiol Med; 1995 Mar; 89(3):319-23. PubMed ID: 7754128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. PATIENT DOSE ASSESSMENT AND OPTIMISATION OF PELVIC RADIOGRAPHY WITH COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEMS.
    Abbeyquaye D; Inkoom S; Hammond NB; Fletcher JJ; Botwe BO
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2021 Aug; 195(1):41-49. PubMed ID: 34320643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.