These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2388739)
21. Reasoning from the body: a historical perspective on abortion regulation and questions of equal protection. Siegel R Stanford Law Rev; 1992 Jan; 44(2):261-381. PubMed ID: 11656213 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. OSHA and equal employment opportunity laws for women. Trebilcock AM Prev Med; 1978 Sep; 7(3):372-84. PubMed ID: 733736 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Implications of the Federal Abortion Ban for Women's Health in the United States. Weitz TA; Yanow S Reprod Health Matters; 2008 May; 16(31 Suppl):99-107. PubMed ID: 18772090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Facing reality: the Pregnancy Discrimination Act falls short for women undergoing infertility treatment. Cushing K Seton Hall Law Rev; 2010; 40(4):1697-731. PubMed ID: 21280392 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Fetal rights: a new assault on feminism. Pollitt K Nation; 1990 Mar; 250(12):409-411, 414-416, 418. PubMed ID: 11656424 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Fetal protection and potential liability: judicial application of the Pregnancy Discrimination Act and the disparate impact theory. Moelis LS Am J Law Med; 1985; 11(3):369-90. PubMed ID: 3842235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Gender discrimination in the medical community. Scott AK Update; 1995 Jul; 11(2):E1. PubMed ID: 16130241 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Social work and the Supreme Court: a clash of values; a time for action. Lens V Soc Work; 2004 Apr; 49(2):327-30. PubMed ID: 15124975 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Forced medical treatment in pregnancy: resolving the conflicting rights of mother and fetus. Meyer KC Med Staff Couns; 1990; 4(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 10104769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Tribe's judicious feminism -- Abortion: The Clash of Absolutes. Allen AL Stanford Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 44(1):179-203. PubMed ID: 11659573 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Webster, vagueness and the First Amendment. Bopp J; Coleson RE Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):217-22. PubMed ID: 2603865 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The free exercise rights of pregnant women who refuse medical treatment. Cherry AL Tenn Law Rev; 2002; 69(3):563-622. PubMed ID: 15378820 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Procreative liberty and the control of conception, pregnancy, and childbirth. Robertson JA Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1984 Feb; 5(12):7-66. PubMed ID: 10264856 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Reproductive laws, women of color, and low-income women. Nsiah-Jefferson L Womens Rights Law Report; 1989; 11(1):15-38. PubMed ID: 11656016 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The argument that never ends. Simon R US News World Rep; 2003 Jan; 134(2):24. PubMed ID: 12561696 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Excluding women from certain jobs because of reproductive or fetal hazard must be justified by objective, scientific evidence. Sculnick MW Employ Relat Today; 1989; 16(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 10295775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. State abortion statutes on the eve of the Supreme Court's decision in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey. Terwilliger LM J Health Hosp Law; 1992 Jun; 25(6):161-74. PubMed ID: 10123589 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]