These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
304 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23889488)
1. Mechanical properties of human skin in vivo: a comparative evaluation in 300 men and women. Luebberding S; Krueger N; Kerscher M Skin Res Technol; 2014 May; 20(2):127-35. PubMed ID: 23889488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of age and regional differences on skin elasticity as measured by the Cutometer. Ryu HS; Joo YH; Kim SO; Park KC; Youn SW Skin Res Technol; 2008 Aug; 14(3):354-8. PubMed ID: 19159383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Age-related changes in skin mechanical properties: a quantitative evaluation of 120 female subjects. Krueger N; Luebberding S; Oltmer M; Streker M; Kerscher M Skin Res Technol; 2011 May; 17(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 21281361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Application of Cutometer area parameters for the study of human skin fatigue. Dobrev H Skin Res Technol; 2005 May; 11(2):120-2. PubMed ID: 15807810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Age-related changes in male skin: quantitative evaluation of one hundred and fifty male subjects. Luebberding S; Krueger N; Kerscher M Skin Pharmacol Physiol; 2014; 27(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 23887477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Skin physiology in men and women: in vivo evaluation of 300 people including TEWL, SC hydration, sebum content and skin surface pH. Luebberding S; Krueger N; Kerscher M Int J Cosmet Sci; 2013 Oct; 35(5):477-83. PubMed ID: 23713991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of skin elasticity test results from the Ballistometer(®) and Cutometer(®). Woo MS; Moon KJ; Jung HY; Park SR; Moon TK; Kim NS; Lee BC Skin Res Technol; 2014 Nov; 20(4):422-8. PubMed ID: 24506419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Age-related changes in skin bio-mechanical properties: the neck skin compared with the cheek and forearm skin in Korean females. Kim E; Cho G; Won NG; Cho J Skin Res Technol; 2013 Aug; 19(3):236-41. PubMed ID: 23441628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The relationship between the Young's modulus of the stratum corneum and age: a pilot study. Hara Y; Masuda Y; Hirao T; Yoshikawa N Skin Res Technol; 2013 Aug; 19(3):339-45. PubMed ID: 23551131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The influences of skin visco-elasticity, hydration level and aging on the formation of wrinkles: a comprehensive and objective approach. Choi JW; Kwon SH; Huh CH; Park KC; Youn SW Skin Res Technol; 2013 Feb; 19(1):e349-55. PubMed ID: 22672420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of Cutometer area parameters in evaluating age-related changes in the skin elasticity of the cheek. Ohshima H; Kinoshita S; Oyobikawa M; Futagawa M; Takiwaki H; Ishiko A; Kanto H Skin Res Technol; 2013 Feb; 19(1):e238-42. PubMed ID: 22650601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of dermal thickness, tissue composition, and body site on skin biomechanical properties. Smalls LK; Randall Wickett R; Visscher MO Skin Res Technol; 2006 Feb; 12(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 16420538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dynamic indentation on human skin in vivo: ageing effects. Boyer G; Laquièze L; Le Bot A; Laquièze S; Zahouani H Skin Res Technol; 2009 Feb; 15(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 19152580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A new method for the visualization and quantification of internal skin elasticity by ultrasound imaging. Osanai O; Ohtsuka M; Hotta M; Kitaharai T; Takema Y Skin Res Technol; 2011 Aug; 17(3):270-7. PubMed ID: 21348895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of skin firmness by the DynaSKIN, a novel non-contact compression device, and its use in revealing the efficacy of a skincare regimen featuring a novel anti-ageing ingredient, acetyl aspartic acid. Kearney EM; Messaraa C; Grennan G; Koeller G; Mavon A; Merinville E Skin Res Technol; 2017 May; 23(2):155-168. PubMed ID: 27546316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Validated Assessment Scales and 3D digital fringe projection method to assess lifetime development of wrinkles in men. Luebberding S; Krueger N; Kerscher M Skin Res Technol; 2014 Feb; 20(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 23724892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Changes in mechanical properties of skin as a marker of biological age. Doubal S; Klemera P Sb Lek; 1998; 99(4):423-8. PubMed ID: 10803283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measurement of the time of flight of photons into the skin: influence of site, age and gender, correlation with other skin parameters. Bernengo JC; Adhoute H; Mougin D Skin Res Technol; 2015 Feb; 21(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 24828758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improvement of the methods for skin mechanical properties evaluation through correlation between different techniques and factor analysis. Neto P; Ferreira M; Bahia F; Costa P Skin Res Technol; 2013 Nov; 19(4):405-16. PubMed ID: 23635400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development of a novel method to measure the elastic properties of skin including subcutaneous tissue: new age-related parameters and scope of application. Fujimura T; Osanai O; Moriwaki S; Akazaki S; Takema Y Skin Res Technol; 2008 Nov; 14(4):504-11. PubMed ID: 18937789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]