319 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23889763)
21. Impact of margin status at 37 months after robot assisted radical prostatectomy.
Warner JN; Nunez RN; Mmeje CO; Colby TV; Ferrigni RG; Humphreys MR; Andrews PE; Castle EP
Can J Urol; 2011 Dec; 18(6):6043-9. PubMed ID: 22166333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Learning curve of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: Comprehensive evaluation and cumulative summation analysis of oncological outcomes.
Sivaraman A; Sanchez-Salas R; Prapotnich D; Yu K; Olivier F; Secin FP; Barret E; Galiano M; Rozet F; Cathelineau X
Urol Oncol; 2017 Apr; 35(4):149.e1-149.e6. PubMed ID: 28117215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The outcome of patients with pathological Gleason score >or=8 prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.
Rodriguez-Covarrubias F; Larre S; De La Taille A; Abbou CC; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2008 Feb; 101(3):305-7. PubMed ID: 17941921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Positive surgical margins and biochemical recurrence following minimally-invasive radical prostatectomy - An analysis of outcomes from a UK tertiary referral centre.
Sachdeva A; Veeratterapillay R; Voysey A; Kelly K; Johnson MI; Aning J; Soomro NA
BMC Urol; 2017 Oct; 17(1):91. PubMed ID: 28969608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Risk of biochemical recurrence and positive surgical margins in patients with pT2 prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.
Røder MA; Thomsen FB; Berg KD; Christensen IB; Brasso K; Vainer B; Iversen P
J Surg Oncol; 2014 Feb; 109(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 24155174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparative assessment of the 1992 and 2002 pathologic T3 substages for the prediction of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Steuber T; Erbersdobler A; Graefen M; Haese A; Huland H; Karakiewicz PI
Cancer; 2006 Feb; 106(4):775-82. PubMed ID: 16400637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The impact of length and location of positive margins in predicting biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.
Sooriakumaran P; Ploumidis A; Nyberg T; Olsson M; Akre O; Haendler L; Egevad L; Nilsson A; Carlsson S; Jonsson M; Adding C; Hosseini A; Steineck G; Wiklund P
BJU Int; 2015 Jan; 115(1):106-13. PubMed ID: 24119144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Favorable risk factors in patients with positive surgical margin after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Ha YS; Kang DI; Kim JH; Joung JY; Yu J; Parihar JS; Salmasi AH; Horie S; Kim WJ; Yi Kim I
Can J Urol; 2014 Jun; 21(3):7290-7. PubMed ID: 24978359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: multiplicative interaction between surgical margin status and pathological stage.
Budäus L; Isbarn H; Eichelberg C; Lughezzani G; Sun M; Perrotte P; Chun FK; Salomon G; Steuber T; Köllermann J; Sauter G; Ahyai SA; Zacharias M; Fisch M; Schlomm T; Haese A; Heinzer H; Huland H; Montorsi F; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI
J Urol; 2010 Oct; 184(4):1341-6. PubMed ID: 20723925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Adverse prognostic significance of capsular incision with radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Shuford MD; Cookson MS; Chang SS; Shintani AK; Tsiatis A; Smith JA; Shappell SB
J Urol; 2004 Jul; 172(1):119-23. PubMed ID: 15201750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Risk factors for biochemical recurrence after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon experience.
Tanimoto R; Fashola Y; Scotland KB; Calvaresi AE; Gomella LG; Trabulsi EJ; Lallas CD
BMC Urol; 2015 Apr; 15():27. PubMed ID: 25879548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Long-term data on the survival of patients with prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy in the prostate-specific antigen era.
Isbarn H; Wanner M; Salomon G; Steuber T; Schlomm T; Köllermann J; Sauter G; Haese A; Heinzer H; Huland H; Graefen M
BJU Int; 2010 Jul; 106(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 20002667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. First Danish single-institution experience with radical prostatectomy: impact of surgical margins on biochemical outcome.
Vrang ML; Røder MA; Vainer B; Christensen IJ; Gruschy L; Brasso K; Iversen P
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2012 Jun; 46(3):172-9. PubMed ID: 22320899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Positive surgical margins are a risk factor for significant biochemical recurrence only in intermediate-risk disease.
Corcoran NM; Hovens CM; Metcalfe C; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Casey RG; Peters J; Harewood L; Goldenberg SL; Costello AJ; Gleave ME
BJU Int; 2012 Sep; 110(6):821-7. PubMed ID: 22257140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Larger maximum tumor diameter at radical prostatectomy is associated with increased biochemical failure, metastasis, and death from prostate cancer after salvage radiation for prostate cancer.
Johnson SB; Hamstra DA; Jackson WC; Zhou J; Foster B; Foster C; Song Y; Li D; Palapattu GS; Kunju L; Mehra R; Sandler H; Feng FY
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Oct; 87(2):275-81. PubMed ID: 23886418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Impact of surgical margin status on long-term cancer control after radical prostatectomy.
Orvieto MA; Alsikafi NF; Shalhav AL; Laven BA; Steinberg GD; Zagaja GP; Brendler CB
BJU Int; 2006 Dec; 98(6):1199-203. PubMed ID: 17125478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Identification of prostate cancer risk categories according to surgical margins status, pathological stage and Gleason score.
Schiavina R; Borghesi M; Fiorentino M; Brunocilla E; Manferrari F; Vagnoni V; Martorana G
Int J Urol; 2013 Nov; 20(11):1097-103. PubMed ID: 23521710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Patterns and predictors of early biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy and adjuvant radiation therapy in men with pT3N0 prostate cancer: implications for multimodal therapies.
Briganti A; Joniau S; Gandaglia G; Cozzarini C; Sun M; Tombal B; Haustermans K; Hinkelbein W; Shariat SF; Karakiewicz PI; Montorsi F; Van Poppel H; Wiegel T
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Dec; 87(5):960-7. PubMed ID: 24351411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Prognostic value of surgical margin status for biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy.
Hashimoto K; Masumori N; Takei F; Fukuta F; Takahashi A; Itoh N; Hasegawa T; Tsukamoto T
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2008 Jan; 38(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 18203710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Prostate carcinoma with positive margins at radical prostatectomy: role of tumour zonal origin in biochemical recurrence.
O'Neil LM; Walsh S; Cohen RJ; Lee S
BJU Int; 2015 Oct; 116 Suppl 3():42-8. PubMed ID: 26218868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
