These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23890209)

  • 1. Effect of clasp design on retention at different intervals using different abutment materials and in a simulated oral condition.
    Helal MA; Baraka OA; Sanad ME; Al-Khiary Y; Ludwig K; Kern M
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Feb; 23(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 23890209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of long-term simulated RPD clasp attachment/detachment on retention loss and wear for two clasp types and three abutment material surfaces.
    Helal MA; Baraka OA; Sanad ME; Ludwig K; Kern M
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Jul; 21(5):370-7. PubMed ID: 22443158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of clasp retention on enamel and composite resin-recontoured abutments following repeated removal in vitro.
    Zarrati S; Sadighpour L; Jahanian G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Apr; 103(4):240-4. PubMed ID: 20362767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retentive forces and fatigue resistance of thermoplastic resin clasps.
    Tannous F; Steiner M; Shahin R; Kern M
    Dent Mater; 2012 Mar; 28(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 22130464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retention of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns on prefabricated implant abutments: an in vitro comparative study of luting agents and abutment surface area.
    Carnaggio TV; Conrad R; Engelmeier RL; Gerngross P; Paravina R; Perezous L; Powers JM
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Oct; 21(7):523-8. PubMed ID: 22469271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimum design for glass fiber-reinforced composite clasps using nonlinear finite element analysis.
    Maruyama H; Nishi Y; Tsuru K; Nagaoka E
    Dent Mater J; 2011; 30(5):626-34. PubMed ID: 21946482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of abutment type and esthetic veneering on preload maintenance of abutment screw of implant-supported crowns.
    Delben JA; Barão VA; Dos Santos PH; Assunção WG
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Feb; 23(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 23725369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of friction coefficient on Akers clasp retention.
    Sato Y; Abe Y; Yuasa Y; Akagawa Y
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Jul; 78(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 9237142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the effect of retightening and mechanical cycling on preload maintenance of retention screws.
    Delben JA; Gomes EA; Barão VA; Assunção WG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):251-6. PubMed ID: 21483877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of fracture resistance of pressable metal ceramic custom implant abutment with a commercially fabricated CAD/CAM zirconia implant abutment.
    Protopapadaki M; Monaco EA; Kim HI; Davis EL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):389-96. PubMed ID: 24011801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of axial wall modification on the retention of cement-retained, implant-supported crowns.
    Tan KM; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Limkangwalmongkol P; Romberg E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 22304741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fatigue resistance and failure mode of CAD/CAM composite resin implant abutments restored with type III composite resin and porcelain veneers.
    Magne P; Oderich E; Boff LL; Cardoso AC; Belser UC
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Nov; 22(11):1275-81. PubMed ID: 21985284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of clasp retention forces and abrasion on different cast crowns.
    Jiang N; Gao WM; Zhang H; Zheng DX
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jun; 111(6):493-8. PubMed ID: 24423460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement.
    Palacios RP; Johnson GH; Phillips KM; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):104-14. PubMed ID: 16911887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Wear of human enamel opposing monolithic zirconia, glass ceramic, and composite resin: an in vitro study.
    Sripetchdanond J; Leevailoj C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1141-50. PubMed ID: 24980740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of internal-gap width and cement type on the retentive force of zirconia copings in pullout testing.
    Son YH; Han CH; Kim S
    J Dent; 2012 Oct; 40(10):866-72. PubMed ID: 22819954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of stresses and forces in selected I-bars using the finite element method.
    Naik PR; Duncanson MG; Mitchell DL; Wiebelt FJ; Johnson DL; Ghosh J
    J Prosthodont; 1997 Mar; 6(1):43-54. PubMed ID: 9497768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Damping behavior of implant-supported restorations.
    Magne P; Silva M; Oderich E; Boff LL; Enciso R
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Feb; 24(2):143-8. PubMed ID: 22092518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bending rigidity of composite resin coating clasps.
    Ikebe K; Kibi M; Ono T; Nokubi T
    J Osaka Univ Dent Sch; 1993 Dec; 33():70-5. PubMed ID: 8935086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fitness and retentive force of cobalt-chromium alloy clasps fabricated with repeated laser sintering and milling.
    Torii M; Nakata T; Takahashi K; Kawamura N; Shimpo H; Ohkubo C
    J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Jul; 62(3):342-346. PubMed ID: 29428170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.