These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23890209)

  • 21. The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns.
    Kim Y; Yamashita J; Shotwell JL; Chong KH; Wang HL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):450-5. PubMed ID: 16765158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The influence of different convergence angles and resin cements on the retention of zirconia copings.
    Ali AO; Kelly JR; Zandparsa R
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Dec; 21(8):614-21. PubMed ID: 22823334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cement selection for implant-supported crowns fabricated with different luting space settings.
    Gultekin P; Gultekin BA; Aydin M; Yalcin S
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Feb; 22(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 23387964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. In vitro assessment of three types of zirconia implant abutments under static load.
    Kim JS; Raigrodski AJ; Flinn BD; Rubenstein JE; Chung KH; Mancl LA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 23566607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The abrasion of dental composite by cobalt-chromium clasps.
    Hamirudin MM; Barsby MJ
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2007 Mar; 15(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 17378453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The Bond Strength of Resin Bonded Bridge Retainers to Abutments of Differing Proportions of Enamel and Composite.
    Durey K; Nattress B
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2015 Mar; 23(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 26415336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of surface treatment on the retention of implant-supported zirconia restorations over short abutments.
    Nejatidanesh F; Savabi O; Jabbari E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jul; 112(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 24388717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Computer-aided designed/computer-assisted manufactured composite resin versus ceramic single-tooth restorations: a 3-year clinical study.
    Vanoorbeek S; Vandamme K; Lijnen I; Naert I
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 20552087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Enamel bonding plastic materials in modifying the form of abutment teeth for the better functioning of partial prostheses.
    Piirto M; Eerikäinen E; Siirilä HS
    J Oral Rehabil; 1977 Jan; 4(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 321728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of modifying the screw access channels of zirconia implant abutment on the cement flow pattern and retention of zirconia restorations.
    Wadhwani C; Chung KH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jul; 112(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 24680357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Fatigue resistance of 2 different CAD/CAM glass-ceramic materials used for single-tooth implant crowns.
    Çavuşoğlu Y; Sahin E; Gürbüz R; Akça K
    Implant Dent; 2011 Oct; 20(5):374-8. PubMed ID: 21881517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Dynamic fatigue and fracture resistance of non-retentive all-ceramic full-coverage molar restorations. Influence of ceramic material and preparation design.
    Clausen JO; Abou Tara M; Kern M
    Dent Mater; 2010 Jun; 26(6):533-8. PubMed ID: 20181388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. In vitro study of the influence of the type of connection on the fracture load of zirconia abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections.
    Sailer I; Sailer T; Stawarczyk B; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):850-8. PubMed ID: 19865625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Load fatigue performance of implant-ceramic abutment combinations.
    Nguyen HQ; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):636-46. PubMed ID: 19885403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Marginal adaptation of 1 fiber-reinforced composite and 2 all-ceramic inlay fixed partial denture systems.
    Monaco C; Krejci I; Bortolotto T; Perakis N; Ferrari M; Scotti R
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(4):373-82. PubMed ID: 16900821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Bond strength of the porcelain repair system to all-ceramic copings and porcelain.
    Lee SJ; Cheong CW; Wright RF; Chang BM
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Feb; 23(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 23725343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth: effect of tooth coloured post material and surface conditioning.
    Toman M; Toksavul S; Sarikanat M; Nergiz I; Schmage P
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2010 Mar; 18(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 20397499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Dynamic retentive force of a mandibular unilateral removable partial denture framework with a back-action clasp.
    Park I; Eto M; Wakabayashi N; Hideshima M; Ohyama T
    J Med Dent Sci; 2001 Dec; 48(4):105-11. PubMed ID: 12160247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Influence of framework design on fracture strength of mandibular anterior all-ceramic resin-bonded fixed partial dentures.
    Koutayas SO; Kern M; Ferraresso F; Strub JR
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(3):223-9. PubMed ID: 12066484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Influence of CAD/CAM on the fit accuracy of implant-supported zirconia and cobalt-chromium fixed dental prostheses.
    de França DG; Morais MH; das Neves FD; Barbosa GA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jan; 113(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 25277028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.