BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23890830)

  • 1. Revision total hip and knee arthroplasty implant identification: implications for use of Unique Device Identification 2012 AAHKS member survey results.
    Wilson NA; Jehn M; York S; Davis CM
    J Arthroplasty; 2014 Feb; 29(2):251-5. PubMed ID: 23890830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Appraisal of evidence base for introduction of new implants in hip and knee replacement: a systematic review of five widely used device technologies.
    Nieuwenhuijse MJ; Nelissen RG; Schoones JW; Sedrakyan A
    BMJ; 2014 Sep; 349():g5133. PubMed ID: 25208953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implant use for primary hip and knee arthroplasty: are we getting it right first time?
    Ng Man Sun S; Gillott E; Bhamra J; Briggs T
    J Arthroplasty; 2013 Jun; 28(6):908-12. PubMed ID: 23507062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Factors influencing choice of implants in total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty: perspectives of surgeons and patients.
    Sharkey PF; Sethuraman V; Hozack WJ; Rothman RH; Stiehl JB
    J Arthroplasty; 1999 Apr; 14(3):281-7. PubMed ID: 10220180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Arthroplasty registers as post-marketing surveillance systems: the Catalan Arthroplasty Register].
    Allepuz A; Serra-Sutton V; Martínez O; Tebé C; Nardi J; Portabella F; Espallargues M;
    Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol; 2013; 57(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 23594980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multiple cultures and extended incubation for hip and knee arthroplasty revision: impact on clinical care.
    DeHaan A; Huff T; Schabel K; Doung YC; Hayden J; Barnes P
    J Arthroplasty; 2013 Sep; 28(8 Suppl):59-65. PubMed ID: 23886405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do previous operative reports provide the critical information necessary for revision total hip arthroplasty?
    Goyal N; Diaz-Ledezma C; Tripathi M; Austin MS; Parvizi J
    J Arthroplasty; 2012 Jun; 27(6):1023-6. PubMed ID: 22440227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Revision total hip and knee replacement.
    Barnett AJ; Toms AD
    Clin Geriatr Med; 2012 Aug; 28(3):431-46. PubMed ID: 22840306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Oblong acetabular cup, type TC, for revision total hip arthroplasty].
    Trč T; Stastný E
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2012; 79(6):506-11. PubMed ID: 23286682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sex and risk of hip implant failure: assessing total hip arthroplasty outcomes in the United States.
    Inacio MC; Ake CF; Paxton EW; Khatod M; Wang C; Gross TP; Kaczmarek RG; Marinac-Dabic D; Sedrakyan A
    JAMA Intern Med; 2013 Mar; 173(6):435-41. PubMed ID: 23420484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Revision and primary hip and knee arthroplasty. A cost analysis.
    Lavernia CJ; Drakeford MK; Tsao AK; Gittelsohn A; Krackow KA; Hungerford DS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1995 Feb; (311):136-41. PubMed ID: 7634568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A prospective analysis of glove perforation in primary and revision total hip and total knee arthroplasty.
    Carter AH; Casper DS; Parvizi J; Austin MS
    J Arthroplasty; 2012 Aug; 27(7):1271-5. PubMed ID: 22425303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Unique device identification system. Final rule.
    Food and Drug Administration, HHS
    Fed Regist; 2013 Sep; 78(185):58785-828. PubMed ID: 24066364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 2012 annual meeting of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons (AAHKS).
    Sporer SM
    J Arthroplasty; 2013 Sep; 28(8 Suppl):1. PubMed ID: 23916638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The results of TKA: what the registries don't tell us.
    Barrack RL
    Orthopedics; 2011 Sep; 34(9):e485-7. PubMed ID: 21902139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bone loss during revision of unicompartmental to total knee arthroplasty: an analysis of implanted polyethylene thickness from the National Joint Registry data.
    Sarraf KM; Konan S; Pastides PS; Haddad FS; Oussedik S
    J Arthroplasty; 2013 Oct; 28(9):1571-4. PubMed ID: 23538124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The financial impact of joint registries in identifying poorly performing implants.
    Luo R; Brekke A; Noble PC
    J Arthroplasty; 2012 Sep; 27(8 Suppl):66-71.e1. PubMed ID: 22682045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of total hip arthroplasty devices using a total joint replacement registry.
    Paxton EW; Ake CF; Inacio MC; Khatod M; Marinac-Dabic D; Sedrakyan A
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2012 May; 21 Suppl 2():53-9. PubMed ID: 22552980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Selection of primary hip and knee arthroplasties for public hospitals in Western Australia: a clinical evidence approach.
    Kop AM; Swarts E
    ANZ J Surg; 2006 Dec; 76(12):1068-74. PubMed ID: 17199692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Usefulness of HA+beta-TCP in bone defects repair during revision hip and knee arthroplasty].
    Kowalczewski JB; Milecki M; Wielopolski A; Slósarczyk A; Marczak D; Okoń T
    Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol; 2010; 75(6):348-52. PubMed ID: 21648152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.