These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

65 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23890939)

  • 1. Noninvasive assessment of hemodynamic response to a fluid challenge using femoral Doppler in critically ill ventilated patients.
    Luzi A; Marty P; Mari A; Conil JM; Geeraerts T; Lepage B; Fourcade O; Silva S; Minville V
    J Crit Care; 2013 Dec; 28(6):902-7. PubMed ID: 23890939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Low predictability of three different noninvasive methods to determine fluid responsiveness in critically ill children.
    Weber T; Wagner T; Neumann K; Deusch E
    Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2015 Mar; 16(3):e89-94. PubMed ID: 25647238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Passive leg raising predicts fluid responsiveness in the critically ill.
    Monnet X; Rienzo M; Osman D; Anguel N; Richard C; Pinsky MR; Teboul JL
    Crit Care Med; 2006 May; 34(5):1402-7. PubMed ID: 16540963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Esophageal Doppler monitoring predicts fluid responsiveness in critically ill ventilated patients.
    Monnet X; Rienzo M; Osman D; Anguel N; Richard C; Pinsky MR; Teboul JL
    Intensive Care Med; 2005 Sep; 31(9):1195-201. PubMed ID: 16059723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An increase in aortic blood flow after an infusion of 100 ml colloid over 1 minute can predict fluid responsiveness: the mini-fluid challenge study.
    Muller L; Toumi M; Bousquet PJ; Riu-Poulenc B; Louart G; Candela D; Zoric L; Suehs C; de La Coussaye JE; Molinari N; Lefrant JY;
    Anesthesiology; 2011 Sep; 115(3):541-7. PubMed ID: 21792056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predicting Fluid Responsiveness in Critically Ill Patients by Using Combined End-Expiratory and End-Inspiratory Occlusions With Echocardiography.
    Jozwiak M; Depret F; Teboul JL; Alphonsine JE; Lai C; Richard C; Monnet X
    Crit Care Med; 2017 Nov; 45(11):e1131-e1138. PubMed ID: 28857907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Passive leg raising is predictive of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients with severe sepsis or acute pancreatitis.
    Préau S; Saulnier F; Dewavrin F; Durocher A; Chagnon JL
    Crit Care Med; 2010 Mar; 38(3):819-25. PubMed ID: 20016380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Continuous noninvasive measurement of aortic blood flow in critically ill patients with a new esophageal echo-Doppler system.
    Bernardin G; Tiger F; Fouché R; Mattéi M
    J Crit Care; 1998 Dec; 13(4):177-83. PubMed ID: 9869544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of acute preload changes on mitral annulus velocity measured by tissue Doppler echocardiography in critically ill patients.
    Quintard H; Muller L; Philip I; Lena P; Ichai C
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2012 Sep; 40(7):419-23. PubMed ID: 22281697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Plethysmographic variation index predicts fluid responsiveness in ventilated patients in the early phase of septic shock in the emergency department: a pilot study.
    Feissel M; Kalakhy R; Banwarth P; Badie J; Pavon A; Faller JP; Quenot JP
    J Crit Care; 2013 Oct; 28(5):634-9. PubMed ID: 23683565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients: False-positive pulse pressure variation is detected by Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of the right ventricle.
    Mahjoub Y; Pila C; Friggeri A; Zogheib E; Lobjoie E; Tinturier F; Galy C; Slama M; Dupont H
    Crit Care Med; 2009 Sep; 37(9):2570-5. PubMed ID: 19623051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Renal perfusion assessment by renal Doppler during fluid challenge in sepsis.
    Schnell D; Camous L; Guyomarc'h S; Duranteau J; Canet E; Gery P; Dumenil AS; Zeni F; Azoulay E; Darmon M
    Crit Care Med; 2013 May; 41(5):1214-20. PubMed ID: 23591208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bedside assessment of right atrial pressure in critically ill septic patients using tissue Doppler ultrasonography.
    Arbo JE; Maslove DM; Beraud AS
    J Crit Care; 2013 Dec; 28(6):1112.e1-5. PubMed ID: 24075298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Carotid Doppler Ultrasonography for Hemodynamic Assessment in Critically Ill Children.
    Rubio AJ; de Souza LL; Nogueira RJN; Brandão MB; de Souza TH
    Pediatr Cardiol; 2022 Feb; 43(2):382-390. PubMed ID: 34518914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Techniques for assessment of intravascular volume in critically ill patients.
    Marik PE
    J Intensive Care Med; 2009; 24(5):329-37. PubMed ID: 19648183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of fluid administration on renal perfusion in critically ill patients.
    Moussa MD; Scolletta S; Fagnoul D; Pasquier P; Brasseur A; Taccone FS; Vincent JL; De Backer D
    Crit Care; 2015 Jun; 19(1):250. PubMed ID: 26070308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of aortic flow indexes derived from transthoracic echocardiography to evaluate response to a fluid challenge in anesthetized dogs.
    de Oliveira GCV; Teixeira-Neto FJ; Dalmagro TL; Alfonso A; Celeita-Rodríguez N; Lobo CPC; Lourenço MLG
    Vet Anaesth Analg; 2021 Mar; 48(2):187-197. PubMed ID: 33551352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Carotid vs. aortic velocity time integral and peak velocity to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. A comparative study.
    Pace R; Lassola S; Miori S; Cammarota G; Barbariol F; Vetrugno L
    Minerva Anestesiol; 2022 May; 88(5):352-360. PubMed ID: 34761663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Clinical evaluation of transthoracic echocardiography predicting fluid responsiveness in septic shock].
    Wu J; Zhang X; Wang Z; Liu B; Jiang X; Lu W; Jin X; Wang X
    Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2014 Jan; 26(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 24506854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of aortic stenosis severity: role of contrast echocardiography in comparison with conventional echocardiography and cardiac catheterization.
    Almeida AG; Sargento L; Gabriel HM; da Costa JM; Morais J; Madeira F; David C; Oliveira J; da Cunha JC; Vagueiro MC
    Rev Port Cardiol; 2002 May; 21(5):555-72. PubMed ID: 12174519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.