These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23891195)

  • 21. Reduced event-related low frequency EEG activity in patients with early onset schizophrenia and their unaffected siblings.
    Simmonite M; Bates AT; Groom M; Hollis C; Liddle PF
    Psychiatry Res; 2015 Apr; 232(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 25745977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Target-related parietal P3 and medial frontal theta index the genetic risk for problematic substance use.
    Harper J; Malone SM; Iacono WG
    Psychophysiology; 2019 Aug; 56(8):e13383. PubMed ID: 31012496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Event-related components of the punishment and reward sensitivity.
    De Pascalis V; Varriale V; D'Antuono L
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Jan; 121(1):60-76. PubMed ID: 19900840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Time-frequency phase-synchrony approaches with ERPs.
    Aviyente S; Tootell A; Bernat EM
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2017 Jan; 111():88-97. PubMed ID: 27864029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. EEG frequency PCA in EEG-ERP dynamics.
    Barry RJ; De Blasio FM
    Psychophysiology; 2018 May; 55(5):e13042. PubMed ID: 29226962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Prestimulus EEG amplitude determinants of ERP responses in a habituation paradigm.
    De Blasio FM; Barry RJ; Steiner GZ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Sep; 89(3):444-50. PubMed ID: 23732790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Using principal components analysis to examine resting state EEG in relation to task performance.
    Karamacoska D; Barry RJ; Steiner GZ
    Psychophysiology; 2019 May; 56(5):e13327. PubMed ID: 30613986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Intrinsic EEG and task-related changes in EEG affect Go/NoGo task performance.
    Karamacoska D; Barry RJ; Steiner GZ; Coleman EP; Wilson EJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Mar; 125():17-28. PubMed ID: 29409782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Does electroencephalogram phase variability account for reduced P3 brain potential in externalizing disorders?
    Burwell SJ; Malone SM; Bernat EM; Iacono WG
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2014 Oct; 125(10):2007-15. PubMed ID: 24656843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Response competition and response inhibition during different choice-discrimination tasks: evidence from ERP measured inside MRI scanner.
    Gonzalez-Rosa JJ; Inuggi A; Blasi V; Cursi M; Annovazzi P; Comi G; Falini A; Leocani L
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 23664841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Theta lingua franca: a common mid-frontal substrate for action monitoring processes.
    Cavanagh JF; Zambrano-Vazquez L; Allen JJ
    Psychophysiology; 2012 Feb; 49(2):220-38. PubMed ID: 22091878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. EEG phase states at stimulus onset in a variable-ISI Go/NoGo task: Effects on ERP components.
    Barry RJ; Fogarty JS; De Blasio FM; Karamacoska D
    Biol Psychol; 2018 Apr; 134():89-102. PubMed ID: 29462656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. EEG-ERP dynamics in a visual Continuous Performance Test.
    Karamacoska D; Barry RJ; De Blasio FM; Steiner GZ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2019 Dec; 146():249-260. PubMed ID: 31648022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Overcoming limitations of the ERP method with Residue Iteration Decomposition (RIDE): a demonstration in go/no-go experiments.
    Ouyang G; Schacht A; Zhou C; Sommer W
    Psychophysiology; 2013 Mar; 50(3):253-65. PubMed ID: 23316862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Preferred EEG brain states at stimulus onset in a fixed interstimulus interval equiprobable auditory Go/NoGo task: a definitive study.
    Barry RJ; De Blasio FM; De Pascalis V; Karamacoska D
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Oct; 94(1):42-58. PubMed ID: 25043955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Is N2 associated with successful suppression of behavior responses in impulse control processes?
    Dong G; Yang L; Hu Y; Jiang Y
    Neuroreport; 2009 Apr; 20(6):537-42. PubMed ID: 19276864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The importance of age in the search for ERP biomarkers of aMCI.
    Cid-Fernández S; Lindín M; Díaz F
    Biol Psychol; 2019 Mar; 142():108-115. PubMed ID: 30721717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Theta oscillations during the processing of monetary loss and gain: a perspective on gender and impulsivity.
    Kamarajan C; Rangaswamy M; Chorlian DB; Manz N; Tang Y; Pandey AK; Roopesh BN; Stimus AT; Porjesz B
    Brain Res; 2008 Oct; 1235():45-62. PubMed ID: 18616934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Response priming in the Go/NoGo task: the N2 reflects neither inhibition nor conflict.
    Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Feb; 118(2):343-55. PubMed ID: 17140848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Individual differences discriminate event-related potentials but not performance during response inhibition.
    Roche RA; Garavan H; Foxe JJ; O'Mara SM
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Jan; 160(1):60-70. PubMed ID: 15480606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.