These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23891204)

  • 1. Recommendations following a multi-laboratory comparison of microbial source tracking methods.
    Stewart JR; Boehm AB; Dubinsky EA; Fong TT; Goodwin KD; Griffith JF; Noble RT; Shanks OC; Vijayavel K; Weisberg SB
    Water Res; 2013 Nov; 47(18):6829-38. PubMed ID: 23891204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of forty-one microbial source tracking methods: a twenty-seven lab evaluation study.
    Boehm AB; Van De Werfhorst LC; Griffith JF; Holden PA; Jay JA; Shanks OC; Wang D; Weisberg SB
    Water Res; 2013 Nov; 47(18):6812-28. PubMed ID: 23880218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multi-laboratory evaluations of the performance of Catellicoccus marimammalium PCR assays developed to target gull fecal sources.
    Sinigalliano CD; Ervin JS; Van De Werfhorst LC; Badgley BD; Ballesté E; Bartkowiak J; Boehm AB; Byappanahalli M; Goodwin KD; Gourmelon M; Griffith J; Holden PA; Jay J; Layton B; Lee C; Lee J; Meijer WG; Noble R; Raith M; Ryu H; Sadowsky MJ; Schriewer A; Wang D; Wanless D; Whitman R; Wuertz S; Santo Domingo JW
    Water Res; 2013 Nov; 47(18):6883-96. PubMed ID: 23916157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance evaluation of canine-associated Bacteroidales assays in a multi-laboratory comparison study.
    Schriewer A; Goodwin KD; Sinigalliano CD; Cox AM; Wanless D; Bartkowiak J; Ebentier DL; Hanley KT; Ervin J; Deering LA; Shanks OC; Peed LA; Meijer WG; Griffith JF; SantoDomingo J; Jay JA; Holden PA; Wuertz S
    Water Res; 2013 Nov; 47(18):6909-20. PubMed ID: 23916711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of PCR and quantitative real-time PCR methods for the characterization of ruminant and cattle fecal pollution sources.
    Raith MR; Kelty CA; Griffith JF; Schriewer A; Wuertz S; Mieszkin S; Gourmelon M; Reischer GH; Farnleitner AH; Ervin JS; Holden PA; Ebentier DL; Jay JA; Wang D; Boehm AB; Aw TG; Rose JB; Balleste E; Meijer WG; Sivaganesan M; Shanks OC
    Water Res; 2013 Nov; 47(18):6921-8. PubMed ID: 23871256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the repeatability and reproducibility of a suite of qPCR-based microbial source tracking methods.
    Ebentier DL; Hanley KT; Cao Y; Badgley BD; Boehm AB; Ervin JS; Goodwin KD; Gourmelon M; Griffith JF; Holden PA; Kelty CA; Lozach S; McGee C; Peed LA; Raith M; Ryu H; Sadowsky MJ; Scott EA; Santo Domingo J; Schriewer A; Sinigalliano CD; Shanks OC; Van De Werfhorst LC; Wang D; Wuertz S; Jay JA
    Water Res; 2013 Nov; 47(18):6839-48. PubMed ID: 23911226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance of viruses and bacteriophages for fecal source determination in a multi-laboratory, comparative study.
    Harwood VJ; Boehm AB; Sassoubre LM; Vijayavel K; Stewart JR; Fong TT; Caprais MP; Converse RR; Diston D; Ebdon J; Fuhrman JA; Gourmelon M; Gentry-Shields J; Griffith JF; Kashian DR; Noble RT; Taylor H; Wicki M
    Water Res; 2013 Nov; 47(18):6929-43. PubMed ID: 23886543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of molecular community analysis methods for discerning fecal sources and human waste.
    Cao Y; Van De Werfhorst LC; Dubinsky EA; Badgley BD; Sadowsky MJ; Andersen GL; Griffith JF; Holden PA
    Water Res; 2013 Nov; 47(18):6862-72. PubMed ID: 23880215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating true human and animal host source contribution in quantitative microbial source tracking using the Monte Carlo method.
    Wang D; Silkie SS; Nelson KL; Wuertz S
    Water Res; 2010 Sep; 44(16):4760-75. PubMed ID: 20822794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Application of an integrated community analysis approach for microbial source tracking in a coastal creek.
    Cao Y; Van De Werfhorst LC; Sercu B; Murray JL; Holden PA
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Sep; 45(17):7195-201. PubMed ID: 21786742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identifying fecal sources in a selected catchment reach using multiple source-tracking tools.
    Vogel JR; Stoeckel DM; Lamendella R; Zelt RB; Santo Domingo JW; Walker SR; Oerther DB
    J Environ Qual; 2007; 36(3):718-29. PubMed ID: 17412907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Microbial and Chemical Source Tracking Markers To Identify Fecal Contamination Sources in the Humber River (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) and Associated Storm Water Outfalls.
    Staley ZR; Grabuski J; Sverko E; Edge TA
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2016 Nov; 82(21):6357-6366. PubMed ID: 27542934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Phenotypic library-based microbial source tracking methods: efficacy in the California collaborative study.
    Harwood VJ; Wiggins B; Hagedorn C; Ellender RD; Gooch J; Kern J; Samadpour M; Chapman AC; Robinson BJ; Thompson BC
    J Water Health; 2003 Dec; 1(4):153-66. PubMed ID: 15382721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantitative identification of fecal water pollution sources by TaqMan real-time PCR assays using Bacteroidales 16S rRNA genetic markers.
    Lee DY; Weir SC; Lee H; Trevors JT
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2010 Dec; 88(6):1373-83. PubMed ID: 20871990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Determination of wild animal sources of fecal indicator bacteria by microbial source tracking (MST) influences regulatory decisions.
    Nguyen KH; Senay C; Young S; Nayak B; Lobos A; Conrad J; Harwood VJ
    Water Res; 2018 Nov; 144():424-434. PubMed ID: 30059905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Microbial Source Tracking Using Quantitative and Digital PCR To Identify Sources of Fecal Contamination in Stormwater, River Water, and Beach Water in a Great Lakes Area of Concern.
    Staley ZR; Boyd RJ; Shum P; Edge TA
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 Oct; 84(20):. PubMed ID: 30097445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Microbial source tracking markers for detection of fecal contamination in environmental waters: relationships between pathogens and human health outcomes.
    Harwood VJ; Staley C; Badgley BD; Borges K; Korajkic A
    FEMS Microbiol Rev; 2014 Jan; 38(1):1-40. PubMed ID: 23815638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of microbial source tracking methods using mixed fecal sources in aqueous test samples.
    Griffith JF; Weisberg SB; McGee CD
    J Water Health; 2003 Dec; 1(4):141-51. PubMed ID: 15382720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Enterococcus and Escherichia coli fecal source apportionment with microbial source tracking genetic markers--is it feasible?
    Wang D; Farnleitner AH; Field KG; Green HC; Shanks OC; Boehm AB
    Water Res; 2013 Nov; 47(18):6849-61. PubMed ID: 23890872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detection of human-derived fecal pollution in environmental waters by use of a PCR-based human polyomavirus assay.
    McQuaig SM; Scott TM; Harwood VJ; Farrah SR; Lukasik JO
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2006 Dec; 72(12):7567-74. PubMed ID: 16997988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.