These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23891204)
21. Semi-quantitative evaluation of fecal contamination potential by human and ruminant sources using multiple lines of evidence. Stoeckel DM; Stelzer EA; Stogner RW; Mau DP Water Res; 2011 May; 45(10):3225-44. PubMed ID: 21513966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Gulls identified as major source of fecal pollution in coastal waters: a microbial source tracking study. Araújo S; Henriques IS; Leandro SM; Alves A; Pereira A; Correia A Sci Total Environ; 2014 Feb; 470-471():84-91. PubMed ID: 24140684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. 16S rRNA-based assays for quantitative detection of universal, human-, cow-, and dog-specific fecal Bacteroidales: a Bayesian approach. Kildare BJ; Leutenegger CM; McSwain BS; Bambic DG; Rajal VB; Wuertz S Water Res; 2007 Aug; 41(16):3701-15. PubMed ID: 17644149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Quo vadis source tracking? Towards a strategic framework for environmental monitoring of fecal pollution. Santo Domingo JW; Bambic DG; Edge TA; Wuertz S Water Res; 2007 Aug; 41(16):3539-52. PubMed ID: 17632210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Validation and field testing of library-independent microbial source tracking methods in the Gulf of Mexico. Harwood VJ; Brownell M; Wang S; Lepo J; Ellender RD; Ajidahun A; Hellein KN; Kennedy E; Ye X; Flood C Water Res; 2009 Nov; 43(19):4812-9. PubMed ID: 19595426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Identification of fecal contamination sources in water using host-associated markers. Krentz CA; Prystajecky N; Isaac-Renton J Can J Microbiol; 2013 Mar; 59(3):210-20. PubMed ID: 23540340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Integrated analysis of water quality parameters for cost-effective faecal pollution management in river catchments. Nnane DE; Ebdon JE; Taylor HD Water Res; 2011 Mar; 45(6):2235-46. PubMed ID: 21324505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Identifying human and livestock sources of fecal contamination in Kenya with host-specific Bacteroidales assays. Jenkins MW; Tiwari S; Lorente M; Gichaba CM; Wuertz S Water Res; 2009 Nov; 43(19):4956-66. PubMed ID: 19692107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Microbial source tracking in a small southern California urban watershed indicates wild animals and growth as the source of fecal bacteria. Jiang SC; Chu W; Olson BH; He JW; Choi S; Zhang J; Le JY; Gedalanga PB Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2007 Sep; 76(4):927-34. PubMed ID: 17589839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Evaluation of host-specific Bacteroidales 16S rRNA gene markers as a complementary tool for detecting fecal pollution in a prairie watershed. Fremaux B; Gritzfeld J; Boa T; Yost CK Water Res; 2009 Nov; 43(19):4838-49. PubMed ID: 19604534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Validation and application of high-throughput quantitative PCR for the simultaneous detection of microbial source tracking markers in environmental water. Raya S; Malla B; Thakali O; Angga MS; Segawa T; Sherchand JB; Haramoto E Sci Total Environ; 2024 Aug; 940():173604. PubMed ID: 38821279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Microbial source tracking of water fecal pollution: a review]. Feng GD; Deng MR; Zhu HH; Guo J; Zhang X; Zhu CX; Liang HL Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2010 Dec; 21(12):3273-81. PubMed ID: 21443019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of genotypic-based microbial source tracking methods requiring a host origin database. Myoda SP; Carson CA; Fuhrmann JJ; Hahm BK; Hartel PG; Yampara-Lquise H; Johnson L; Kuntz RL; Nakatsu CH; Sadowsky MJ; Samadpour M J Water Health; 2003 Dec; 1(4):167-80. PubMed ID: 15382722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Characterization of Enterococcus spp. from human and animal feces using 16S rRNA sequences, the esp gene, and PFGE for microbial source tracking in Korea. Kim SY; Lee JE; Lee S; Lee HT; Hur HG; Ko G Environ Sci Technol; 2010 May; 44(9):3423-8. PubMed ID: 20356091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluation of antibiotic resistance analysis and ribotyping for identification of faecal pollution sources in an urban watershed. Moore DF; Harwood VJ; Ferguson DM; Lukasik J; Hannah P; Getrich M; Brownell M J Appl Microbiol; 2005; 99(3):618-28. PubMed ID: 16108804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Assessment of statistical methods used in library-based approaches to microbial source tracking. Ritter KJ; Carruthers E; Carson CA; Ellender RD; Harwood VJ; Kingsley K; Nakatsu C; Sadowsky M; Shear B; West B; Whitlock JE; Wiggins BA; Wilbur JD J Water Health; 2003 Dec; 1(4):209-23. PubMed ID: 15382725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Improving the performance of an end-point PCR assay commonly used for the detection of Bacteroidales pertaining to cow feces. Liu R; Chan CF; Lun CH; Lau SC Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2012 Feb; 93(4):1703-13. PubMed ID: 22218766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Microbial source tracking in a rural watershed dominated by cattle. Graves AK; Hagedorn C; Brooks A; Hagedorn RL; Martin E Water Res; 2007 Aug; 41(16):3729-39. PubMed ID: 17582454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Bacterial source tracking guides management of boat head waste in a coastal resort area. Mallin MA; Haltom MI; Song B; Tavares ME; Dellies SP J Environ Manage; 2010 Dec; 91(12):2748-53. PubMed ID: 20727664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Temporal assessment of the impact of exposure to cow feces in two watersheds by multiple host-specific PCR assays. Lee YJ; Molina M; Santo Domingo JW; Willis JD; Cyterski M; Endale DM; Shanks OC Appl Environ Microbiol; 2008 Nov; 74(22):6839-47. PubMed ID: 18806002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]