These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23891384)

  • 1. Risk factors for bacterial contamination during boar semen collection.
    Goldberg AM; Argenti LE; Faccin JE; Linck L; Santi M; Bernardi ML; Cardoso MR; Wentz I; Bortolozzo FP
    Res Vet Sci; 2013 Oct; 95(2):362-7. PubMed ID: 23891384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adjusted method of penis fixation during boar semi-automatic semen collection aiming to reduce bacterial contamination.
    Paschoal AFL; Mellagi APG; Ferrari CV; Takeuti KL; Oliveira GDS; Bernardi ML; Ulguim RDR; Bortolozzo FP
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2021 Jun; 56(6):897-904. PubMed ID: 33740831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An update on North American boar stud practices.
    Knox R; Levis D; Safranski T; Singleton W
    Theriogenology; 2008 Nov; 70(8):1202-8. PubMed ID: 18656252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impact of bacteriospermia on boar sperm storage and reproductive performance.
    Kuster CE; Althouse GC
    Theriogenology; 2016 Jan; 85(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 26525397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Factors influencing boar sperm cryosurvival.
    Roca J; Hernández M; Carvajal G; Vázquez JM; Martínez EA
    J Anim Sci; 2006 Oct; 84(10):2692-9. PubMed ID: 16971570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sanitary procedures for the production of extended semen.
    Althouse GC
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2008 Jul; 43 Suppl 2():374-8. PubMed ID: 18638149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The value of microscopic semen motility assessment at collection for a commercial artificial insemination center, a retrospective study on factors explaining variation in pig fertility.
    Broekhuijse ML; Soštarić E; Feitsma H; Gadella BM
    Theriogenology; 2012 Apr; 77(7):1466-1479.e3. PubMed ID: 22289218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bacterial Contamination of Boar Semen and its Relationship to Sperm Quality Preserved in Commercial Extender Containing Gentamicin Sulfate.
    Gączarzewicz D; Udała J; Piasecka M; Błaszczyk B; Stankiewicz T
    Pol J Vet Sci; 2016 Sep; 19(3):451-459. PubMed ID: 27760038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of hygienic critical control points in boar semen production.
    Schulze M; Ammon C; Rüdiger K; Jung M; Grobbel M
    Theriogenology; 2015 Feb; 83(3):430-7. PubMed ID: 25459424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Increasing storage time of extended boar semen reduces sperm DNA integrity.
    Boe-Hansen GB; Ersbøll AK; Greve T; Christensen P
    Theriogenology; 2005 Apr; 63(7):2006-19. PubMed ID: 15823356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Liquid storage of boar semen: Current and future perspectives on the use of cationic antimicrobial peptides to replace antibiotics in semen extenders.
    Schulze M; Dathe M; Waberski D; Müller K
    Theriogenology; 2016 Jan; 85(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 26264695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of storage effects in liquid preserved boar semen.
    Waberski D; Henning H; Petrunkina AM
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2011 Sep; 46 Suppl 2():45-8. PubMed ID: 21884276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differences in the ability of spermatozoa from individual boar ejaculates to withstand different semen-processing techniques.
    Parrilla I; del Olmo D; Sijses L; Martinez-Alborcia MJ; Cuello C; Vazquez JM; Martinez EA; Roca J
    Anim Reprod Sci; 2012 May; 132(1-2):66-73. PubMed ID: 22554791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Apoptotic-like changes in the spermatozoa of fresh and stored boar semen and the quality of embryos produced in vivo.
    Trzcińska M; Bryła M; Smorąg Z
    Anim Reprod Sci; 2011 Mar; 124(1-2):90-7. PubMed ID: 21392900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Field fertility of frozen boar semen: a retrospective report comprising over 2600 AI services spanning a four year period.
    Didion BA; Braun GD; Duggan MV
    Anim Reprod Sci; 2013 Mar; 137(3-4):189-96. PubMed ID: 23348011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Thermotemporal dynamics of contaminant bacteria and antimicrobials in extended porcine semen.
    Althouse GC; Pierdon MS; Lu KG
    Theriogenology; 2008 Nov; 70(8):1317-23. PubMed ID: 18774598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detection of atypical porcine pestivirus in semen from commercial boar studs in the United States.
    Gatto IRH; Arruda PH; Visek CA; Victoria JG; Patterson AR; Krull AC; Schwartz KJ; de Oliveira LG; Arruda BL
    Transbound Emerg Dis; 2018 Apr; 65(2):e339-e343. PubMed ID: 29144025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Field investigations of bacterial contaminants and their effects on extended porcine semen.
    Althouse GC; Kuster CE; Clark SG; Weisiger RM
    Theriogenology; 2000 Mar; 53(5):1167-76. PubMed ID: 10798493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Challenges and Limits Using Antimicrobial Peptides in Boar Semen Preservation.
    Schulze M; Grobbel M; Müller K; Junkes C; Dathe M; Rüdiger K; Jung M
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2015 Jul; 50 Suppl 2():5-10. PubMed ID: 26174913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of hygiene on bacterial contamination in extended boar semen: An eight-year retrospective study of 28 European AI centers.
    Nitsche-Melkus E; Bortfeldt R; Jung M; Schulze M
    Theriogenology; 2020 Apr; 146():133-139. PubMed ID: 31806246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.