BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23891391)

  • 21. Multiple gestations/pregnancies from IVF process in a fertility center in Nigeria, 2009-2011: implementing policy towards fewer (double and single) embryo transfer.
    Olukoya OY; Okeke CC; Kemi AI; Ogbeche RO; Adewusi AJ; Ashiru OA
    Nig Q J Hosp Med; 2012; 22(2):80-4. PubMed ID: 23175902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The economic impact of the assisted reproductive technologies.
    Katz P; Nachtigall R; Showstack J
    Nat Cell Biol; 2002 Oct; 4 Suppl():s29-32. PubMed ID: 12479612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2005.
    Wright VC; Chang J; Jeng G; Macaluso M;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2008 Jun; 57(5):1-23. PubMed ID: 18566567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. World collaborative report on Assisted Reproductive Technology, 2002.
    ; de Mouzon J; Lancaster P; Nygren KG; Sullivan E; Zegers-Hochschild F; Mansour R; Ishihara O; Adamson D
    Hum Reprod; 2009 Sep; 24(9):2310-20. PubMed ID: 19474459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Addressing the growing problem of multiple gestations created by assisted reproductive therapies.
    Nakhuda GS; Sauer MV
    Semin Perinatol; 2005 Oct; 29(5):355-62. PubMed ID: 16360495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cumulative live-birth rates after assisted reproductive technology.
    Moragianni VA; Penzias AS
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jun; 22(3):189-92. PubMed ID: 20216414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Origin and outcome of multiple pregnancies in Bern, Switzerland, 1995-2006 and the current proposal of the Swiss parliament to revise the Swiss law of reproductive medicine: Switzerland quo vadis?
    Wunder D; Neurohr EM; Faouzi M; Birkhäuser MH
    Swiss Med Wkly; 2013; 143():w13864. PubMed ID: 24089329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2003 results from the Canadian ART Register.
    Gunby J; Daya S;
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Sep; 88(3):550-9. PubMed ID: 17303133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Single embryo transfer for all.
    Cutting R
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2018 Nov; 53():30-37. PubMed ID: 30104130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Single embryo transfer reduces the risk of perinatal mortality, a population study.
    Sullivan EA; Wang YA; Hayward I; Chambers GM; Illingworth P; McBain J; Norman RJ
    Hum Reprod; 2012 Dec; 27(12):3609-15. PubMed ID: 22990515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Fertility treatments and multiple births in the United States.
    Kulkarni AD; Jamieson DJ; Jones HW; Kissin DM; Gallo MF; Macaluso M; Adashi EY
    N Engl J Med; 2013 Dec; 369(23):2218-25. PubMed ID: 24304051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Why are multiple pregnancy rates and single embryo transfer rates so different globally, and what do we do about it?
    Adamson GD; Norman RJ
    Fertil Steril; 2020 Oct; 114(4):680-689. PubMed ID: 33010940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The singleton, term gestation, and live birth rate per cycle initiated: a 1-year experience in in vitro fertilization cycles with native and donated oocytes.
    Bellver J; Albert C; Soares SR; Alvarez C; Pellicer A
    Fertil Steril; 2005 May; 83(5):1404-9. PubMed ID: 15866576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Successful assisted reproductive technology: the beauty of one.
    Hogue CJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Nov; 100(5 Pt 1):1017-9. PubMed ID: 12423869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Multiple deliveries: the reduced impact of in vitro fertilisation in Australia.
    Umstad MP; Hale L; Wang YA; Sullivan EA
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2013 Apr; 53(2):158-64. PubMed ID: 23432818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. How to avoid multiple pregnancies in assistive reproductive technologies.
    Cohen J; Jones HW
    Semin Reprod Med; 2001 Sep; 19(3):269-78. PubMed ID: 11679908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Assisted reproductive technologies in Canada: 2005 results from the Canadian Assisted Reproductive Technologies Register.
    Gunby J; Bissonnette F; Librach C; Cowan L;
    Fertil Steril; 2009 May; 91(5):1721-30. PubMed ID: 18423460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Single blastocyst embryo transfer maintains comparable pregnancy rates to double cleavage-stage embryo transfer but results in healthier pregnancy outcomes.
    Zander-Fox DL; Tremellen K; Lane M
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2011 Oct; 51(5):406-10. PubMed ID: 21806585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Trends and factors associated with the Day 5 embryo transfer, assisted reproductive technology surveillance, USA, 2001-2009.
    Marsh CA; Farr SL; Chang J; Kissin DM; Grainger DA; Posner SF; Macaluso M; Jamieson DJ
    Hum Reprod; 2012 Aug; 27(8):2325-31. PubMed ID: 22627658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reducing multiple pregnancy in assisted reproduction technology: towards a policy of single blastocyst transfer in younger women.
    Kalu E; Thum MY; Abdalla H
    BJOG; 2008 Aug; 115(9):1143-50. PubMed ID: 18518874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.