These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23892862)

  • 1. Patient satisfaction with primary care: are there differences between the approaches in family and general medicine?
    Gavran L; Jašarević E; Hasanica N
    Med Glas (Zenica); 2013 Aug; 10(2):379-84. PubMed ID: 23892862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An evaluation of patient satisfaction in Turkey with the EUROPEP instrument.
    Dağdeviren N; Akturk Z
    Yonsei Med J; 2004 Feb; 45(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 15004864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The EUROPEP questionnaire for patient's evaluation of general practice care: Bulgarian experience.
    Dimova R; Stoyanova R; Keskinova D
    Croat Med J; 2017 Feb; 58(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 28252877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does Family Medicine training in Thailand affect patient satisfaction with primary care doctors?
    Jaturapatporn D; Dellow A
    BMC Fam Pract; 2007 Mar; 8():14. PubMed ID: 17394639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of the consultation satisfaction questionnaire to examine patients' satisfaction with general practitioners and community nurses: reliability, replicability and discriminant validity.
    Poulton BC
    Br J Gen Pract; 1996 Jan; 46(402):26-31. PubMed ID: 8745848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is patient satisfaction with organizational aspects of their general practitioner's practice associated with patient and doctor gender? An observational study.
    Sebo P; Herrmann FR; Haller DM
    BMC Fam Pract; 2016 Aug; 17(1):120. PubMed ID: 27729018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Evaluation of patients' satisfaction level as a part of the quality of primary health care functioning].
    Miller M; Supranowicz P; Gebska-Kuczerowska A; Car J
    Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2007 Nov; 23(137):367-70. PubMed ID: 18361322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [How do patients evaluate general practice? German results from the European Project on Patient Evaluation of General Practice Care (EUROPEP)].
    Klingenberg A; Bahrs O; Szecsenyi J
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 1999 Aug; 93(6):437-45. PubMed ID: 10519193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patient satisfaction with family practice in Turkey: Three-year trend from 2010 to 2012.
    Aktürk Z; Ateşoğlu D; Çiftçi E
    Eur J Gen Pract; 2015; 21(4):238-45. PubMed ID: 26205156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Evaluation of primary care from the perspective of users: adaptation of the EUROPEP instrument for major Brazilian urban centers].
    Brandão AL; Giovanella L; Campos CE
    Cien Saude Colet; 2013 Jan; 18(1):103-14. PubMed ID: 23338501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patients' recommendation of doctor as an indicator of patient satisfaction.
    Kersnik J
    Hong Kong Med J; 2003 Aug; 9(4):247-50. PubMed ID: 12904611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Association between family doctors' practices characteristics and patient evaluation of care.
    Klemenc-Ketis Z; Petek D; Kersnik J
    Health Policy; 2012 Aug; 106(3):269-75. PubMed ID: 22583579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patients' evaluations of family practice care and attributes of a good family physician.
    Ali NS; Khuwaja AK; Kausar S; Nanji K
    Qual Prim Care; 2012; 20(5):375-83. PubMed ID: 23114005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of the Italian version of the EUROPEP instrument for patient evaluation of general practice care.
    Milano M; Mola E; Collecchia G; Del Carlo A; Giancane R; Visentin G; Nicolucci A
    Eur J Gen Pract; 2007; 13(2):92-4. PubMed ID: 17534746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patient satisfaction with antiretroviral services at primary health-care facilities in the Free State, South Africa--a two-year study using four waves of cross-sectional data.
    Wouters E; Heunis C; van Rensburg D; Meulemans H
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2008 Oct; 8():210. PubMed ID: 18844998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patient's evaluations and expectations of primary care medicine in Israel revisited after two decades - Health Service Research.
    Goldstein R; Azuz-Lieberman N; Sarid M; Gaver A
    Patient Educ Couns; 2022 Mar; 105(3):734-740. PubMed ID: 34266713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Experiences of adult patients using primary care services in Poland - a cross-sectional study in QUALICOPC study framework.
    Oleszczyk M; Krztoń-Królewiecka A; Schäfer WLA; Boerma WGW; Windak A
    BMC Fam Pract; 2017 Nov; 18(1):93. PubMed ID: 29166872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Family Medicine Panel Size with Care Teams: Impact on Quality.
    Angstman KB; Horn JL; Bernard ME; Kresin MM; Klavetter EW; Maxson J; Willis FB; Grover ML; Bryan MJ; Thacher TD
    J Am Board Fam Med; 2016; 29(4):444-51. PubMed ID: 27390375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing importance and performance from a patient perspective in English general practice: a cross-sectional survey.
    Sirdifield C; Godoy Caballero A; Windle K; Jackson C; McKay S; Schäfer W; Siriwardena AN
    Fam Pract; 2016 Apr; 33(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 26939590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patient experiences with family medicine: a longitudinal study after the Dutch health care reforms in 2006.
    van den Hombergh P; van Doorn-Klomberg A; Campbell S; Wensing M; Braspenning J
    BMC Fam Pract; 2016 Aug; 17(1):118. PubMed ID: 27561993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.