191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23893083)
1. Five-year follow-up of total disc replacement compared to fusion: a randomized controlled trial.
Sköld C; Tropp H; Berg S
Eur Spine J; 2013 Oct; 22(10):2288-95. PubMed ID: 23893083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Total disc replacement versus multidisciplinary rehabilitation in patients with chronic low back pain and degenerative discs: 8-year follow-up of a randomized controlled multicenter trial.
Furunes H; Storheim K; Brox JI; Johnsen LG; Skouen JS; Franssen E; Solberg TK; Sandvik L; Hellum C
Spine J; 2017 Oct; 17(10):1480-1488. PubMed ID: 28583869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Total disc replacement compared to lumbar fusion: a randomised controlled trial with 2-year follow-up.
Berg S; Tullberg T; Branth B; Olerud C; Tropp H
Eur Spine J; 2009 Oct; 18(10):1512-9. PubMed ID: 19506919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mid- to long-term results of total lumbar disc replacement: a prospective analysis with 5- to 10-year follow-up.
Siepe CJ; Heider F; Wiechert K; Hitzl W; Ishak B; Mayer MH
Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1417-31. PubMed ID: 24448028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sex life and sexual function in men and women before and after total disc replacement compared with posterior lumbar fusion.
Berg S; Fritzell P; Tropp H
Spine J; 2009 Dec; 9(12):987-94. PubMed ID: 19819762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Five-year results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter, Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential arthrodesis for the treatment of single-level degenerative disc disease.
Zigler JE; Delamarter RB
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Dec; 17(6):493-501. PubMed ID: 23082846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Women do not fare worse than men after lumbar fusion surgery: Two-year follow-up results from 4,780 prospectively collected patients in the Swedish National Spine Register with lumbar degenerative disc disease and chronic low back pain.
Triebel J; Snellman G; Sandén B; Strömqvist F; Robinson Y
Spine J; 2017 May; 17(5):656-662. PubMed ID: 27845232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term clinical outcome of the Charité III total lumbar disc replacement.
Kitzen J; Schotanus MGM; van Kuijk SMJ; Jutten EMC; Kort NP; van Rhijn LW; Willems PC
Eur Spine J; 2020 Jul; 29(7):1527-1535. PubMed ID: 31993792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mid- to long-term results of total disc replacement for lumbar degenerative disc disease: a systematic review.
Cui XD; Li HT; Zhang W; Zhang LL; Luo ZP; Yang HL
J Orthop Surg Res; 2018 Dec; 13(1):326. PubMed ID: 30585142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The long-term outcome of lumbar fusion in the Swedish lumbar spine study.
Hedlund R; Johansson C; Hägg O; Fritzell P; Tullberg T;
Spine J; 2016 May; 16(5):579-87. PubMed ID: 26363250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Total disc replacement for chronic back pain in the presence of disc degeneration.
Jacobs W; Van der Gaag NA; Tuschel A; de Kleuver M; Peul W; Verbout AJ; Oner FC
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Sep; (9):CD008326. PubMed ID: 22972118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Disc height and motion patterns in the lumbar spine in patients operated with total disc replacement or fusion for discogenic back pain. Results from a randomized controlled trial.
Berg S; Tropp HT; Leivseth G
Spine J; 2011 Nov; 11(11):991-8. PubMed ID: 21978518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fusion and nonsurgical treatment for symptomatic lumbar degenerative disease: a systematic review of Oswestry Disability Index and MOS Short Form-36 outcomes.
Carreon LY; Glassman SD; Howard J
Spine J; 2008; 8(5):747-55. PubMed ID: 18037354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up.
Rouben D; Casnellie M; Ferguson M
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jul; 24(5):288-96. PubMed ID: 20975594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up.
Guyer RD; McAfee PC; Banco RJ; Bitan FD; Cappuccino A; Geisler FH; Hochschuler SH; Holt RT; Jenis LG; Majd ME; Regan JJ; Tromanhauser SG; Wong DC; Blumenthal SL
Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):374-86. PubMed ID: 18805066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 2001 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies: Lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain: a multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group.
Fritzell P; Hägg O; Wessberg P; Nordwall A;
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Dec; 26(23):2521-32; discussion 2532-4. PubMed ID: 11725230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dynamics of improvement following total lumbar disc replacement: is the outcome predictable?
Siepe CJ; Tepass A; Hitzl W; Meschede P; Beisse R; Korge A; Mayer HM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Nov; 34(23):2579-86. PubMed ID: 19927108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. On total disc replacement.
Berg S
Acta Orthop Suppl; 2011 Feb; 82(343):1-29. PubMed ID: 21542779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A prospective, multi-institutional comparative effectiveness study of lumbar spine surgery in morbidly obese patients: does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion result in superior outcomes?
Adogwa O; Carr K; Thompson P; Hoang K; Darlington T; Perez E; Fatemi P; Gottfried O; Cheng J; Isaacs RE
World Neurosurg; 2015 May; 83(5):860-6. PubMed ID: 25535070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lumbar total disc replacement: predictors for long-term outcome.
Furunes H; Hellum C; Brox JI; Rossvoll I; Espeland A; Berg L; Brøgger HM; Småstuen MC; Storheim K
Eur Spine J; 2018 Mar; 27(3):709-718. PubMed ID: 29103126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
