These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

643 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23893997)

  • 1. Prediction accuracy for a simulated maternally affected trait of beef cattle using different genomic evaluation models.
    Lourenco DA; Misztal I; Wang H; Aguilar I; Tsuruta S; Bertrand JK
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Sep; 91(9):4090-8. PubMed ID: 23893997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Methods for genomic evaluation of a relatively small genotyped dairy population and effect of genotyped cow information in multiparity analyses.
    Lourenco DA; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Aguilar I; Ezra E; Ron M; Shirak A; Weller JI
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Mar; 97(3):1742-52. PubMed ID: 24472123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development of genomic predictions for Angus cattle in Brazil incorporating genotypes from related American sires.
    Campos GS; Cardoso FF; Gomes CCG; Domingues R; de Almeida Regitano LC; de Sena Oliveira MC; de Oliveira HN; Carvalheiro R; Albuquerque LG; Miller S; Misztal I; Lourenco D
    J Anim Sci; 2022 Feb; 100(2):. PubMed ID: 35031806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of alternative approaches to single-trait genomic prediction using genotyped and non-genotyped Hanwoo beef cattle.
    Lee J; Cheng H; Garrick D; Golden B; Dekkers J; Park K; Lee D; Fernando R
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jan; 49(1):2. PubMed ID: 28093065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of conventional BLUP and single-step genomic BLUP evaluations for yearling weight and carcass traits in Hanwoo beef cattle using single trait and multi-trait models.
    Mehrban H; Lee DH; Naserkheil M; Moradi MH; Ibáñez-Escriche N
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0223352. PubMed ID: 31609979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving accuracy of direct and maternal genetic effects in genomic evaluations using pooled boar semen: a simulation study1.
    Maiorano AM; Assen A; Bijma P; Chen CY; Silva JAIV; Herring WO; Tsuruta S; Misztal I; Lourenco DAL
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Jul; 97(8):3237-3245. PubMed ID: 31240314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genetic evaluation using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in American Angus.
    Lourenco DA; Tsuruta S; Fragomeni BO; Masuda Y; Aguilar I; Legarra A; Bertrand JK; Amen TS; Wang L; Moser DW; Misztal I
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Jun; 93(6):2653-62. PubMed ID: 26115253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Application of single step genomic BLUP under different uncertain paternity scenarios using simulated data.
    Tonussi RL; Silva RMO; Magalhães AFB; Espigolan R; Peripolli E; Olivieri BF; Feitosa FLB; Lemos MVA; Berton MP; Chiaia HLJ; Pereira ASC; Lôbo RB; Bezerra LAF; Magnabosco CU; Lourenço DAL; Aguilar I; Baldi F
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0181752. PubMed ID: 28957330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genomic prediction ability for beef fatty acid profile in Nelore cattle using different pseudo-phenotypes.
    Chiaia HLJ; Peripolli E; de Oliveira Silva RM; Feitosa FLB; de Lemos MVA; Berton MP; Olivieri BF; Espigolan R; Tonussi RL; Gordo DGM; de Albuquerque LG; de Oliveira HN; Ferrinho AM; Mueller LF; Kluska S; Tonhati H; Pereira ASC; Aguilar I; Baldi F
    J Appl Genet; 2018 Nov; 59(4):493-501. PubMed ID: 30251238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differing genetic trend estimates from traditional and genomic evaluations of genotyped animals as evidence of preselection bias in US Holsteins.
    Masuda Y; VanRaden PM; Misztal I; Lawlor TJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Jun; 101(6):5194-5206. PubMed ID: 29573806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Short communication: Single-step genomic evaluation of milk production traits using multiple-trait random regression model in Chinese Holsteins.
    Kang H; Ning C; Zhou L; Zhang S; Yan Q; Liu JF
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Dec; 101(12):11143-11149. PubMed ID: 30268613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of genomic predictions for lowly heritable traits using multi-step and single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in Holstein cattle.
    Guarini AR; Lourenco DAL; Brito LF; Sargolzaei M; Baes CF; Miglior F; Misztal I; Schenkel FS
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Sep; 101(9):8076-8086. PubMed ID: 29935829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracies of direct genomic breeding values in Hereford beef cattle using national or international training populations.
    Saatchi M; Ward J; Garrick DJ
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Apr; 91(4):1538-51. PubMed ID: 23345550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Weighted single-step genomic BLUP improves accuracy of genomic breeding values for protein content in French dairy goats: a quantitative trait influenced by a major gene.
    Teissier M; Larroque H; Robert-Granié C
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Jun; 50(1):31. PubMed ID: 29907084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genomic selection models double the accuracy of predicted breeding values for bacterial cold water disease resistance compared to a traditional pedigree-based model in rainbow trout aquaculture.
    Vallejo RL; Leeds TD; Gao G; Parsons JE; Martin KE; Evenhuis JP; Fragomeni BO; Wiens GD; Palti Y
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Feb; 49(1):17. PubMed ID: 28148220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Breeding value reliabilities for multiple-trait single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor.
    Ben Zaabza H; Taskinen M; Mäntysaari EA; Pitkänen T; Aamand GP; Strandén I
    J Dairy Sci; 2022 Jun; 105(6):5221-5237. PubMed ID: 35400498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving the accuracy of genomic evaluation for linear body measurement traits using single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction in Hanwoo beef cattle.
    Naserkheil M; Lee DH; Mehrban H
    BMC Genet; 2020 Dec; 21(1):144. PubMed ID: 33267771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of genomic predictions for harvest and carcass weight in channel catfish.
    Garcia ALS; Bosworth B; Waldbieser G; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Lourenco DAL
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Dec; 50(1):66. PubMed ID: 30547740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genome-wide marker-assisted selection combining all pedigree phenotypic information with genotypic data in one step: An example using broiler chickens.
    Chen CY; Misztal I; Aguilar I; Tsuruta S; Meuwissen TH; Aggrey SE; Wing T; Muir WM
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Jan; 89(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 20889689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computational strategies for national integration of phenotypic, genomic, and pedigree data in a single-step best linear unbiased prediction.
    Legarra A; Ducrocq V
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Aug; 95(8):4629-45. PubMed ID: 22818478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 33.