265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23894234)
1. The ESHRE-ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies.
Grimbizis GF; Gordts S; Di Spiezio Sardo A; Brucker S; De Angelis C; Gergolet M; Li TC; Tanos V; Brölmann H; Gianaroli L; Campo R
Gynecol Surg; 2013 Aug; 10(3):199-212. PubMed ID: 23894234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The ESHRE/ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies.
Grimbizis GF; Gordts S; Di Spiezio Sardo A; Brucker S; De Angelis C; Gergolet M; Li TC; Tanos V; Brölmann H; Gianaroli L; Campo R
Hum Reprod; 2013 Aug; 28(8):2032-44. PubMed ID: 23771171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Thessaloniki ESHRE/ESGE consensus on diagnosis of female genital anomalies.
Grimbizis GF; Di Spiezio Sardo A; Saravelos SH; Gordts S; Exacoustos C; Van Schoubroeck D; Bermejo C; Amso NN; Nargund G; Timmerman D; Athanasiadis A; Brucker S; De Angelis C; Gergolet M; Li TC; Tanos V; Tarlatzis B; Farquharson R; Gianaroli L; Campo R
Hum Reprod; 2016 Jan; 31(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 26537921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The comprehensiveness of the ESHRE/ESGE classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies: a systematic review of cases not classified by the AFS system.
Di Spiezio Sardo A; Campo R; Gordts S; Spinelli M; Cosimato C; Tanos V; Brucker S; Li TC; Gergolet M; De Angelis C; Gianaroli L; Grimbizis G
Hum Reprod; 2015 May; 30(5):1046-58. PubMed ID: 25788565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Thessaloniki ESHRE/ESGE consensus on diagnosis of female genital anomalies.
Grimbizis GF; Di Spiezio Sardo A; Saravelos SH; Gordts S; Exacoustos C; Van Schoubroeck D; Bermejo C; Amso NN; Nargund G; Timmermann D; Athanasiadis A; Brucker S; De Angelis C; Gergolet M; Li TC; Tanos V; Tarlatzis B; Farquharson R; Gianaroli L; Campo R
Gynecol Surg; 2016; 13():1-16. PubMed ID: 26918000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the ESHRE-ESGE and ASRM classifications of Müllerian duct anomalies in everyday practice.
Ludwin A; Ludwin I
Hum Reprod; 2015 Mar; 30(3):569-80. PubMed ID: 25534461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. ESHRE/ESGE female genital tract anomalies classification system-the potential impact of discarding arcuate uterus on clinical practice.
Knez J; Saridogan E; Van Den Bosch T; Mavrelos D; Ambler G; Jurkovic D
Hum Reprod; 2018 Apr; 33(4):600-606. PubMed ID: 29514262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-dimensional ultrasound in the diagnosis and the classification of congenital uterine anomalies using the ESHRE/ESGE classification: a diagnostic accuracy study.
Kougioumtsidou A; Mikos T; Grimbizis GF; Karavida A; Theodoridis TD; Sotiriadis A; Tarlatzis BC; Athanasiadis AP
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2019 Mar; 299(3):779-789. PubMed ID: 30661094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound compared with magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of Müllerian duct anomalies using ESHRE-ESGE consensus on the classification of congenital anomalies of the female genital tract.
Graupera B; Pascual MA; Hereter L; Browne JL; Úbeda B; Rodríguez I; Pedrero C
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Nov; 46(5):616-22. PubMed ID: 25690307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Septate uterus according to ESHRE/ESGE, ASRM and CUME definitions: association with infertility and miscarriage, cost and warnings for women and healthcare systems.
Ludwin A; Ludwin I; Coelho Neto MA; Nastri CO; Bhagavath B; Lindheim SR; Martins WP
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 54(6):800-814. PubMed ID: 30977223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reliability of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology/European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy and American Society for Reproductive Medicine classification systems for congenital uterine anomalies detected using three-dimensional ultrasonography.
Ludwin A; Ludwin I; Kudla M; Kottner J
Fertil Steril; 2015 Sep; 104(3):688-97.e8. PubMed ID: 26158905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Obstetric Complications in Women With Congenital Uterine Anomalies According to the 2013 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology and the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy Classification: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Panagiotopoulos M; Tseke P; Michala L
Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Jan; 139(1):138-148. PubMed ID: 34856567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Can Classifications Adequately Represent Genital Malformations?: EVA Study ( E SHRE/ESGE | V CUAM | A FS) - A Prospective Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Current Female Genital Malformation Classifications.
Kiblboeck S; Oppelt P; Oppelt P; Stein R; Ommer S; Pavlik R; Rall K; Kongrtay K; Wagner H; Hermann P; Trautner PS
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 2023 Jul; 83(7):827-834. PubMed ID: 37564897
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. ESHRE-ESGE versus ASRM classification in the diagnosis of septate uterus: a retrospective study.
Ouyang Y; Yi Y; Gong F; Lin G; Li X
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Oct; 298(4):845-850. PubMed ID: 30159673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic Concordance and Discrepancies in 3D TVUS and MRI of Congenital Uterine Malformations across the ASRM 2016, ASRM 2021, ESHRE/ESGE 2016, and CUME 2018.
Gürses C; Kaya Kılıç K
Curr Med Imaging; 2023 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 38099535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical approach for the classification of congenital uterine malformations.
Grimbizis GF; Campo R;
Gynecol Surg; 2012 May; 9(2):119-129. PubMed ID: 22611348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnosing Septate Uterus Using Three-Dimensional Ultrasound Using Three Different Classifications: An Interobserver and Intraobserver Agreement Study.
Peixoto C; Castro M; Carriles I; Arriba M; Lapresa V; Alcazar JL
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2021 Dec; 43(12):911-918. PubMed ID: 34933384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Female genital tract congenital malformations and the applicability of the ESHRE/ESGE classification: a systematic retrospective analysis of 920 patients.
Schöller D; Hölting M; Stefanescu D; Burow H; Schönfisch B; Rall K; Taran FA; Grimbizis GF; Di Spiezio Sardo A; Brucker SY
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Jun; 297(6):1473-1481. PubMed ID: 29549434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Infantile or hypoplastic uterus? A proposal for a modification to the ESHRE/ESGE classification of female genital tract congenital abnormalities.
Küçük T; Ata B
Facts Views Vis Obgyn; 2022 Mar; 14(1):49-50. PubMed ID: 35373547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Classification of Uterine Anomalies by 3-Dimensional Ultrasonography Using ESHRE/ESGE Criteria: Interobserver Variability.
Bermejo C; Martínez-Ten P; Ruíz-López L; Estévez M; Gil MM
Reprod Sci; 2018 May; 25(5):740-747. PubMed ID: 28847221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
