These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23894425)

  • 1. Yes, you can? A speaker's potency to act upon his words orchestrates early neural responses to message-level meaning.
    Bornkessel-Schlesewsky I; Krauspenhaar S; Schlesewsky M
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(7):e69173. PubMed ID: 23894425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The communicative style of a speaker can affect language comprehension? ERP evidence from the comprehension of irony.
    Regel S; Coulson S; Gunter TC
    Brain Res; 2010 Jan; 1311():121-35. PubMed ID: 19900421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The neural integration of speaker and message.
    Van Berkum JJ; van den Brink D; Tesink CM; Kos M; Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Apr; 20(4):580-91. PubMed ID: 18052777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Are foreign-accented speakers that 'incredible'? The impact of the speaker's indexical properties on sentence processing.
    Foucart A; Hartsuiker RJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2021 Jul; 158():107902. PubMed ID: 34052231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does dynamic information about the speaker's face contribute to semantic speech processing? ERP evidence.
    Hernández-Gutiérrez D; Abdel Rahman R; Martín-Loeches M; Muñoz F; Schacht A; Sommer W
    Cortex; 2018 Jul; 104():12-25. PubMed ID: 29715582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speaker Demographics Modulate Listeners' Neural Correlates of Spoken Word Processing.
    Wu H; Duan X; Cai ZG
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2024 Oct; 36(10):2208-2226. PubMed ID: 39023368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tell me sweet little lies: An event-related potentials study on the processing of social lies.
    Moreno EM; Casado P; Martín-Loeches M
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 16(4):616-25. PubMed ID: 27007770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A speaker's gesture style can affect language comprehension: ERP evidence from gesture-speech integration.
    Obermeier C; Kelly SD; Gunter TC
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2015 Sep; 10(9):1236-43. PubMed ID: 25688095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Autistic adults anticipate and integrate meaning based on the speaker's voice: Evidence from eye-tracking and event-related potentials.
    Barzy M; Black J; Williams D; Ferguson HJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Jun; 149(6):1097-1115. PubMed ID: 31714095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Flexible predictions during listening comprehension: Speaker reliability affects anticipatory processes.
    Brothers T; Dave S; Hoversten LJ; Traxler MJ; Swaab TY
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Dec; 135():107225. PubMed ID: 31605686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neural responses towards a speaker's feeling of (un)knowing.
    Jiang X; Pell MD
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Jan; 81():79-93. PubMed ID: 26700458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Unification of speaker and meaning in language comprehension: an FMRI study.
    Tesink CM; Petersson KM; van Berkum JJ; van den Brink D; Buitelaar JK; Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Nov; 21(11):2085-99. PubMed ID: 19016606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On predicting form and meaning in a second language.
    Ito A; Martin AE; Nieuwland MS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Apr; 43(4):635-652. PubMed ID: 27668483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pragmatic skills predict online counterfactual comprehension: Evidence from the N400.
    Kulakova E; Nieuwland MS
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Oct; 16(5):814-24. PubMed ID: 27160367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lexical prediction via forward models: N400 evidence from German Sign Language.
    Hosemann J; Herrmann A; Steinbach M; Bornkessel-Schlesewsky I; Schlesewsky M
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Sep; 51(11):2224-37. PubMed ID: 23896445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On how the brain decodes vocal cues about speaker confidence.
    Jiang X; Pell MD
    Cortex; 2015 May; 66():9-34. PubMed ID: 25796072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neural responses to interpersonal requests: Effects of imposition and vocally-expressed stance.
    Vergis N; Jiang X; Pell MD
    Brain Res; 2020 Aug; 1740():146855. PubMed ID: 32348774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What makes a discourse constraining? Comparing the effects of discourse message and scenario fit on the discourse-dependent N400 effect.
    Otten M; Van Berkum JJ
    Brain Res; 2007 Jun; 1153():166-77. PubMed ID: 17466281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What is heavier, a kilo of feathers or a kilo of lead? What you know determines what you understand.
    Macizo P; Herrera A
    Neuroreport; 2010 Oct; 21(14):938-42. PubMed ID: 20717062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Who are you talking to? The role of addressee identity in utterance comprehension.
    Caffarra S; Wolpert M; Scarinci D; Mancini S
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Apr; 57(4):e13527. PubMed ID: 31953848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.