These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23895391)

  • 1. Effects of stimulus order on duration discrimination sensitivity are under attentional control.
    Dyjas O; Bausenhart KM; Ulrich R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Feb; 40(1):292-307. PubMed ID: 23895391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of stimulus order on comparative judgments across stimulus attributes and sensory modalities.
    Ellinghaus R; Ulrich R; Bausenhart KM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jan; 44(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 29309193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of stimulus order on discrimination processes in comparative and equality judgements: data and models.
    Dyjas O; Ulrich R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(6):1121-50. PubMed ID: 24295428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attention and entrainment: P3b varies as a function of temporal predictability.
    Schmidt-Kassow M; Schubotz RI; Kotz SA
    Neuroreport; 2009 Jan; 20(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 18987559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sensory modality and time perception in children and adults.
    Droit-Volet S; Meck WH; Penney TB
    Behav Processes; 2007 Feb; 74(2):244-50. PubMed ID: 17084041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Crossmodal attention switching: auditory dominance in temporal discrimination tasks.
    Lukas S; Philipp AM; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Nov; 153():139-46. PubMed ID: 25463554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Examining the relationship between skilled music training and attention.
    Wang X; Ossher L; Reuter-Lorenz PA
    Conscious Cogn; 2015 Nov; 36():169-79. PubMed ID: 26160137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Crossmodal congruency effects based on stimulus identity.
    Frings C; Spence C
    Brain Res; 2010 Oct; 1354():113-22. PubMed ID: 20674555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Audiovisual asynchrony modulates the Colavita visual dominance effect.
    Koppen C; Spence C
    Brain Res; 2007 Dec; 1186():224-32. PubMed ID: 18005944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Time course of auditory masker effects: tapping the locus of audiovisual integration?
    Steenken R; Diederich A; Colonius H
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Apr; 435(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 18355963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Top-down feature-based selection of matching features for audio-visual synchrony discrimination.
    Fujisaki W; Nishida S
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 433(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 18281153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of stimulus order on discrimination sensitivity for short and long durations.
    Bausenhart KM; Dyjas O; Ulrich R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 May; 77(4):1033-43. PubMed ID: 25832187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does the sight of physical threat induce a tactile processing bias? Modality-specific attentional facilitation induced by viewing threatening pictures.
    Van Damme S; Gallace A; Spence C; Crombez G; Moseley GL
    Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 1253():100-6. PubMed ID: 19094970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Crossmodal facilitation of masked visual target discrimination by informative auditory cuing.
    Ngo MK; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Jul; 479(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 20580658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Audiovisual temporal discrimination is less efficient with aging: an event-related potential study.
    Setti A; Finnigan S; Sobolewski R; McLaren L; Robertson IH; Reilly RB; Kenny RA; Newell FN
    Neuroreport; 2011 Aug; 22(11):554-8. PubMed ID: 21691233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How attentional systems process conflicting cues. The superiority of social over symbolic orienting revisited.
    Nummenmaa L; Hietanen JK
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Dec; 35(6):1738-54. PubMed ID: 19968432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceptual asymmetries in the discrimination of brief auditory time intervals.
    Grondin S; Voyer D; Bisson N
    Laterality; 2011 Sep; 16(5):513-27. PubMed ID: 21128161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of Frequency Separation and Diotic/Dichotic Presentations on the Alternation Frequency Limits in Audition Derived from a Temporal Phase Discrimination Task.
    Kanaya S; Fujisaki W; Nishida S; Furukawa S; Yokosawa K
    Perception; 2015 Feb; 44(2):198-214. PubMed ID: 26561972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The modality shift effect and the effectiveness of warning signals in different modalities.
    Rodway P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Oct; 120(2):199-226. PubMed ID: 15993828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.