These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2389544)

  • 21. An environmental nuisance: odor concentrated and transported by dust.
    Bottcher RW
    Chem Senses; 2001 Mar; 26(3):327-31. PubMed ID: 11287391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of carvacrol and thymol on odor emissions from livestock wastes.
    Varel VH; Miller DN
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(9):143-8. PubMed ID: 11762454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Characterization and dispersion modeling of odors from a piggery facility.
    Karageorgos P; Latos M; Mpasiakos C; Chalarakis E; Dimitrakakis E; Daskalakis C; Psillakis E; Lazaridis M; Kalogerakis N
    J Environ Qual; 2010; 39(6):2170-8. PubMed ID: 21284315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Case study of odor and indoor air quality assessment in the dewatering building at the Stickney Water Reclamation Plant.
    Sharma M; O'Connell S; Garelli B; Sattayatewa C; Moschandreas D; Pagilla K
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(4):773-9. PubMed ID: 22277239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Analysis of air pollution from swine production by using air dispersion model and GIS in Quebec.
    Sarr JH; Goïta K; Desmarais C
    J Environ Qual; 2010; 39(6):1975-83. PubMed ID: 21284294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An economic evaluation of livestock odor regulation distances.
    Bazen EF; Fleming RA
    J Environ Qual; 2004; 33(6):1997-2006. PubMed ID: 15537921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Critical review: the health significance of environmental odor pollution.
    Shusterman D
    Arch Environ Health; 1992; 47(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 1540008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Livestock odors: implications for human health and well-being.
    Schiffman SS
    J Anim Sci; 1998 May; 76(5):1343-55. PubMed ID: 9621940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dispersion modeling to compare alternative technologies for odor remediation at swine facilities.
    Schiffman SS; Graham BG; Williams CM
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2008 Sep; 58(9):1166-76. PubMed ID: 18817109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Greenhouse gas emission reduction and environmental quality improvement from implementation of aerobic waste treatment systems in swine farms.
    Vanotti MB; Szogi AA; Vives CA
    Waste Manag; 2008; 28(4):759-66. PubMed ID: 18060761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Measurement technic for the determination of odor substances in waste gases from intensive animal rearing stations].
    Bernert J
    Gesund Ing; 1977 Nov; 98(11):318/S26-S29/321. PubMed ID: 924155
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Direct measurements of the ozone formation potential from livestock and poultry waste emissions.
    Howard CJ; Kumar A; Mitloehner F; Stackhouse K; Green PG; Flocchini RG; Kleeman MJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Apr; 44(7):2292-8. PubMed ID: 20199064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Impact of production systems on swine confinement buildings bioaerosols.
    Létourneau V; Nehmé B; Mériaux A; Massé D; Duchaine C
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2010 Feb; 7(2):94-102. PubMed ID: 19953413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A field study on downwind odor transport from swine facilities.
    Zhu J; Li X
    J Environ Sci Health B; 2000 Mar; 35(2):245-58. PubMed ID: 10736772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Relation of repeated exposures to air emissions from swine industrial livestock operations to sleep duration and awakenings in nearby residential communities.
    MacNell NS; Jackson CL; Heaney CD
    Sleep Health; 2021 Oct; 7(5):528-534. PubMed ID: 34193392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Alternatives to minimize the environmental impact of large swine production units.
    Miner JR
    J Anim Sci; 1999 Feb; 77(2):440-4. PubMed ID: 10100674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Predictions by the Odor From Feedlots, Setback Estimation Tool (OFFSET) compared with observations by neighborhood monitors.
    Nimmermark SA; Jacobson LD; Schmidt DR; Gay SW
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2005 Sep; 55(9):1306-14. PubMed ID: 16259426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Emission and control of gases and odorous substances from animal housing and manure depots].
    Hartung J
    Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1992 Feb; 192(5):389-418. PubMed ID: 1554400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Ammonia emissions from livestock industries in Canada: feasibility of abatement strategies.
    Carew R
    Environ Pollut; 2010 Aug; 158(8):2618-26. PubMed ID: 20542610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Science of odor as a potential health issue.
    Schiffman SS; Williams CM
    J Environ Qual; 2005; 34(1):129-38. PubMed ID: 15647542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.