132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23895449)
21. The spacing effect, free recall, and two-process theory: a closer look.
Toppino TC; Bloom LC
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 May; 28(3):437-44. PubMed ID: 12018496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Vestibular influence on water maze retention: transient whole body rotations improve the accuracy of the cue-based retention strategy.
McGauran AM; O'Mara SM; Commins S
Behav Brain Res; 2005 Mar; 158(1):183-7. PubMed ID: 15680206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The spacing effect in older and younger adults: does context matter?
Bercovitz KE; Bell MC; Simone PM; Wiseheart M
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2017 Nov; 24(6):703-716. PubMed ID: 27805865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Within-session spacing improves delayed recall in children.
Zigterman JR; Simone PM; Bell MC
Memory; 2015; 23(4):625-32. PubMed ID: 24805305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Detrimental influence of contextual change on spacing effects in free recall.
Verkoeijen PP; Rikers RM; Schmidt HG
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Jul; 30(4):796-800. PubMed ID: 15238024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The effects of presentation rate and retention interval on memory for items and associations in younger adults: a simulation of older adults' associative memory deficit.
Brubaker MS; Naveh-Benjamin M
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2014; 21(1):1-26. PubMed ID: 23509862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Toward a unified account of spacing effects in explicit cued-memory tasks.
Russo R; Mammarella N; Avons SE
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Sep; 28(5):819-29. PubMed ID: 12219792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effects of the time dimension and presentation on incidental memory.
Toyota H
Percept Mot Skills; 2009 Aug; 109(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 19831090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Diminished but not forgotten: effects of aging on magnitude of spacing effect benefits.
Simone PM; Bell MC; Cepeda NJ
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2013 Sep; 68(5):674-80. PubMed ID: 23103383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The effect of study time distribution on learning and retention: a Goldilocks principle for presentation rate.
de Jonge M; Tabbers HK; Pecher D; Zeelenberg R
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Mar; 38(2):405-12. PubMed ID: 22004269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Noncriterial recollection influences metacognitive monitoring and control processes.
Brewer GA; Marsh RL; Clark-Foos A; Meeks JT
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Oct; 63(10):1936-42. PubMed ID: 20198538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The interplay between value and relatedness as bases for metacognitive monitoring and control: evidence for agenda-based monitoring.
Soderstrom NC; McCabe DP
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1236-42. PubMed ID: 21574750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Examining the lag effect under incidental encoding: contributions of semantic priming and reminding.
Bui DC; Maddox GB; Zou F; Hale SS
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(11):2134-48. PubMed ID: 24749628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Metacognition influences item-method directed forgetting.
Foster NL; Sahakyan L
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Sep; 38(5):1309-24. PubMed ID: 22468801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. "A long time ago, in a context far, far away": retrospective time estimates and internal context change.
Sahakyan L; Smith JR
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 23957367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A functional application of the spacing effect to improve learning and memory in persons with multiple sclerosis.
Goverover Y; Hillary FG; Chiaravalloti N; Arango-Lasprilla JC; DeLuca J
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2009 Jul; 31(5):513-22. PubMed ID: 18720184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Judgments of learning reflect encoding fluency: conclusive evidence for the ease-of-processing hypothesis.
Undorf M; Erdfelder E
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1264-9. PubMed ID: 21574748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Basic processes in reading: the effect of interletter spacing.
Risko EF; Lanthier SN; Besner D
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Nov; 37(6):1449-57. PubMed ID: 21787106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. At the same time or apart in time? The role of presentation timing and retrieval dynamics in generalization.
Vlach HA; Ankowski AA; Sandhofer CM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jan; 38(1):246-54. PubMed ID: 21895392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. When does testing enhance retention? A distribution-based interpretation of retrieval as a memory modifier.
Halamish V; Bjork RA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):801-12. PubMed ID: 21480751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
