These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23895449)

  • 61. Gummed-up memory: chewing gum impairs short-term recall.
    Kozlov MD; Hughes RW; Jones DM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(3):501-13. PubMed ID: 22150606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Effects of simple- and complex-place contexts in the multiple-context paradigm.
    Isarida T; Isarida TK
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Dec; 63(12):2399-412. PubMed ID: 20446185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Verbal and spatial acquisition as a function of distributed practice and code-specific interference.
    Young AP; Healy AF; Jones M; Bourne LE
    Mem Cognit; 2019 May; 47(4):779-791. PubMed ID: 30680640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Pictorial encoding effects and memory confusions in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm: evidence for the activation of spontaneous imagery.
    Foley MA; Foy J
    Memory; 2008 Oct; 16(7):712-27. PubMed ID: 18720219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Test-enhanced learning: taking memory tests improves long-term retention.
    Roediger HL; Karpicke JD
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Mar; 17(3):249-55. PubMed ID: 16507066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Fact learning: how information accuracy, delay, and repeated testing change retention and retrieval experience.
    Barber SJ; Rajaram S; Marsh EJ
    Memory; 2008 Nov; 16(8):934-46. PubMed ID: 18949663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. When does memory monitoring succeed versus fail? Comparing item-specific and relational encoding in the DRM paradigm.
    Huff MJ; Bodner GE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1246-56. PubMed ID: 23356241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. An item gains and losses analysis of false memories suggests critical items receive more item-specific processing than list items.
    Burns DJ; Martens NJ; Bertoni AA; Sweeney EJ; Lividini MD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):277-89. PubMed ID: 16569146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Differences in procedural knowledge after a "spaced" and a "massed" version of an intensive course in emergency medicine, investigating a very short spacing interval.
    Breckwoldt J; Ludwig JR; Plener J; Schröder T; Gruber H; Peters H
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Sep; 16(1):249. PubMed ID: 27670782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Directed forgetting of complex pictures in an item method paradigm.
    Hauswald A; Kissler J
    Memory; 2008 Nov; 16(8):797-809. PubMed ID: 18608977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Encoding richness of self-generated elaboration and spacing effects on incidental memory.
    Toyota H; Kikuchi Y
    Percept Mot Skills; 2005 Oct; 101(2):621-7. PubMed ID: 16383100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Errorless learning and spaced retrieval: how do these methods fare in healthy and clinical populations?
    Haslam C; Hodder KI; Yates PJ
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2011 Apr; 33(4):432-47. PubMed ID: 21229436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Mental fixation and metacognitive predictions of insight in creative problem solving.
    Storm BC; Hickman ML
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(4):802-13. PubMed ID: 25230691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Practice-induced and sequential modulations of the Simon effect.
    Soetens E; Maetens K; Zeischka P
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):895-911. PubMed ID: 20436188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. The impact of path crossing on visuo-spatial serial memory: encoding or rehearsal effect?
    Parmentier FB; Andrés P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Nov; 59(11):1867-74. PubMed ID: 16987778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Repeated testing produces superior transfer of learning relative to repeated studying.
    Butler AC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Sep; 36(5):1118-33. PubMed ID: 20804289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Spacing affects some but not all visual searches: implications for theories of attention and crowding.
    Reddy L; VanRullen R
    J Vis; 2007 Feb; 7(2):3.1-17. PubMed ID: 18217818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Effects of bilateral eye movements on the retrieval of item, associative, and contextual information.
    Parker A; Relph S; Dagnall N
    Neuropsychology; 2008 Jan; 22(1):136-45. PubMed ID: 18211163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Study-time effect on free recall within and out of context.
    Isarida T
    Memory; 2005 Nov; 13(8):785-95. PubMed ID: 16298888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. To mass or space? Young children do not possess adults' incorrect biases about spaced learning.
    Vlach HA; Bredemann CA; Kraft C
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2019 Jul; 183():115-133. PubMed ID: 30870697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.