These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

290 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23895451)

  • 1. Stimulus-category and response-repetition effects in task switching: an evaluation of four explanations.
    Druey MD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):125-46. PubMed ID: 23895451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electrophysiological correlates of residual switch costs.
    Gajewski PD; Kleinsorge T; Falkenstein M
    Cortex; 2010 Oct; 46(9):1138-48. PubMed ID: 19717147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can time-based decay explain temporal distinctiveness effects in task switching?
    Grange JA; Cross E
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(1):19-45. PubMed ID: 25028178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Examining binding effects on task switch costs and response-repetition effects: Variations of the cue modality and stimulus modality in task switching.
    Kandalowski SRM; Seibold JC; Schuch S; Koch I
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1632-1643. PubMed ID: 31820281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exploring task-set reconfiguration with random task sequences.
    Milán EG; Sanabria D; Tornay F; González A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Mar; 118(3):319-31. PubMed ID: 15698827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Temporal distinctiveness and repetition benefits in task switching: disentangling stimulus-related and response-related contributions.
    Horoufchin H; Philipp AM; Koch I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Mar; 64(3):434-46. PubMed ID: 20680886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Explaining response-repetition effects in task switching: evidence from switching cue modality suggests episodic binding and response inhibition.
    Koch I; Frings C; Schuch S
    Psychol Res; 2018 May; 82(3):570-579. PubMed ID: 28286905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The dissipating task-repetition benefit in cued task switching: task-set decay or temporal distinctiveness?
    Horoufchin H; Philipp AM; Koch I
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Apr; 37(2):455-72. PubMed ID: 20853997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Feature Integration and Task Switching: Diminished Switch Costs after Controlling for Stimulus, Response, and Cue Repetitions.
    Schmidt JR; Liefooghe B
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0151188. PubMed ID: 26964102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The interplay of crossmodal attentional preparation and modality compatibility in cued task switching.
    Fintor E; Stephan DN; Koch I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Apr; 72(4):955-965. PubMed ID: 29642783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. More attention to attention? An eye-tracking investigation of selection of perceptual attributes during a task switch.
    Longman CS; Lavric A; Monsell S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1142-51. PubMed ID: 23088543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. ERPs dissociate the effects of switching task sets and task cues.
    Nicholson R; Karayanidis F; Bumak E; Poboka D; Michie PT
    Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 1095(1):107-23. PubMed ID: 16714004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of stimulus features and instruction on response coding, selection, and inhibition: evidence from repetition effects under task switching.
    Druey MD; Hübner R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Oct; 61(10):1573-600. PubMed ID: 18777444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The origin of switch costs: task preparation or task application?
    Los SA; Van der Burg E
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Oct; 63(10):1895-915. PubMed ID: 20401813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The mechanism of priming: episodic retrieval or priming of pop-out?
    Becker SI
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Feb; 127(2):324-39. PubMed ID: 17868628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perceptual and conceptual priming of cue encoding in task switching.
    Schneider DW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jul; 42(7):1112-26. PubMed ID: 26766605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Response-repetition costs in task switching: how they are modulated by previous-trial response-category activation.
    Grzyb KR; Hübner R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Jan; 139(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 22137015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Components of task switching: a closer look at task switching and cue switching.
    Schmitz F; Voss A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Sep; 151():184-96. PubMed ID: 25004102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Switching, plasticity, and prediction in a saccadic task-switch paradigm.
    Barton JJ; Greenzang C; Hefter R; Edelman J; Manoach DS
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Jan; 168(1-2):76-87. PubMed ID: 16096781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Task-switching cost and repetition priming: two overlooked confounds in the first-set procedure of the Sternberg paradigm and how they affect memory set-size effects.
    Jou J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 Oct; 67(10):1871-94. PubMed ID: 24321032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.