218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23895990)
1. [Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading in prostate biopsy samples].
Bori R; Salamon F; Móczár C; Cserni G
Orv Hetil; 2013 Aug; 154(31):1219-25. PubMed ID: 23895990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in Japan and the United States.
Oyama T; Allsbrook WC; Kurokawa K; Matsuda H; Segawa A; Sano T; Suzuki K; Epstein JI
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2005 Aug; 129(8):1004-10. PubMed ID: 16048389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interobserver variability in Gleason histological grading of prostate cancer.
Ozkan TA; Eruyar AT; Cebeci OO; Memik O; Ozcan L; Kuskonmaz I
Scand J Urol; 2016 Dec; 50(6):420-424. PubMed ID: 27416104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma using tissue microarrays.
De la Taille A; Viellefond A; Berger N; Boucher E; De Fromont M; Fondimare A; Molinié V; Piron D; Sibony M; Staroz F; Triller M; Peltier E; Thiounn N; Rubin MA
Hum Pathol; 2003 May; 34(5):444-9. PubMed ID: 12792917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: urologic pathologists.
Allsbrook WC; Mangold KA; Johnson MH; Lane RB; Lane CG; Amin MB; Bostwick DG; Humphrey PA; Jones EC; Reuter VE; Sakr W; Sesterhenn IA; Troncoso P; Wheeler TM; Epstein JI
Hum Pathol; 2001 Jan; 32(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 11172298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Inter-observer reproducibility before and after web-based education in the Gleason grading of the prostate adenocarcinoma among the Iranian pathologists.
Abdollahi A; Sheikhbahaei S; Meysamie A; Bakhshandeh M; Hosseinzadeh H
Acta Med Iran; 2014; 52(5):370-4. PubMed ID: 24902017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automated deep-learning system for Gleason grading of prostate cancer using biopsies: a diagnostic study.
Bulten W; Pinckaers H; van Boven H; Vink R; de Bel T; van Ginneken B; van der Laak J; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Litjens G
Lancet Oncol; 2020 Feb; 21(2):233-241. PubMed ID: 31926805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: general pathologist.
Allsbrook WC; Mangold KA; Johnson MH; Lane RB; Lane CG; Epstein JI
Hum Pathol; 2001 Jan; 32(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 11172299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interobserver agreement of Gleason score and modified Gleason score in needle biopsy and in surgical specimen of prostate cancer.
Veloso SG; Lima MF; Salles PG; Berenstein CK; Scalon JD; Bambirra EA
Int Braz J Urol; 2007; 33(5):639-46; discussion 647-51. PubMed ID: 17980061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [To the Editors regarding our paper "Reproducibility of Gleason grading in prostate biopsy samples"].
Rita B
Orv Hetil; 2013 Nov; 154(44):1763. PubMed ID: 24377108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma among general pathologists.
Singh RV; Agashe SR; Gosavi AV; Sulhyan KR
Indian J Cancer; 2011; 48(4):488-95. PubMed ID: 22293266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [To the Editors, regarding Bori et al., "Reproducibility of Gleason grading in prostate biopsy samples"].
Imre R
Orv Hetil; 2013 Nov; 154(44):1763. PubMed ID: 24377107
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Increasing the number of biopsies increases the concordance of Gleason scores of needle biopsies and prostatectomy specimens.
Divrik RT; Eroglu A; Sahin A; Zorlu F; Ozen H
Urol Oncol; 2007; 25(5):376-82. PubMed ID: 17826653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Classic and International Society of Urological Pathology 2005 Modified Gleason grading using needle biopsies from the Reduction by Dutasteride of Prostate Cancer Events (REDUCE) trial.
Lucia MS; Bostwick DG; Somerville MC; Fowler IL; Rittmaster RS
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Dec; 137(12):1740-6. PubMed ID: 24283854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A grading dilemma; Gleason scoring system: Are we sufficiently compatible? A multi center study.
Dere Y; Çelik ÖI; Çelik SY; Ekmekçi S; Evcim G; Pehlivan F; Ağalar A; Deliktaş H; Çulhacı N
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2020 Feb; 63(Supplement):S25-S29. PubMed ID: 32108622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnosis of "Poorly Formed Glands" Gleason Pattern 4 Prostatic Adenocarcinoma on Needle Biopsy: An Interobserver Reproducibility Study Among Urologic Pathologists With Recommendations.
Zhou M; Li J; Cheng L; Egevad L; Deng FM; Kunju LP; Magi-Galluzzi C; Melamed J; Mehra R; Mendrinos S; Osunkoya AO; Paner G; Shen SS; Tsuzuki T; Trpkov K; Tian W; Yang X; Shah RB
Am J Surg Pathol; 2015 Oct; 39(10):1331-9. PubMed ID: 26099009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Gleason grading of prostate cancer in needle core biopsies: a comparison of general and urologic pathologists.
Al-Maghrabi JA; Bakshi NA; Farsi HM
Ann Saudi Med; 2013; 33(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 23458939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Reproducibility of malignancy grading in prostatic cancers using the Gleason-Böckling system].
Kiss F; Lakner G; Csellár M; Nagy P; Tóth A; Vittay G
Orv Hetil; 1997 May; 138(19):1195-9. PubMed ID: 9235527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System.
Epstein JI; Egevad L; Amin MB; Delahunt B; Srigley JR; Humphrey PA;
Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Feb; 40(2):244-52. PubMed ID: 26492179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interobserver Reproducibility of Percent Gleason Pattern 4 in Prostatic Adenocarcinoma on Prostate Biopsies.
Sadimin ET; Khani F; Diolombi M; Meliti A; Epstein JI
Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Dec; 40(12):1686-1692. PubMed ID: 27487740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
