These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23896414)

  • 1. Young children's difficulty in disregarding information from external features when matching unfamiliar faces.
    Sugimura T
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2013 Oct; 116(2):296-308. PubMed ID: 23896414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attention to internal face features in unfamiliar face matching.
    Fletcher KI; Butavicius MA; Lee MD
    Br J Psychol; 2008 Aug; 99(Pt 3):379-94. PubMed ID: 17706001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 7-11-year-old children show an advantage for matching and recognizing the internal features of familiar faces: evidence against a developmental shift.
    Bonner L; Burton M
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Aug; 57(6):1019-29. PubMed ID: 15370514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does matching of internal and external facial features depend on orientation and viewpoint?
    Meinhardt-Injac B; Meinhardt G; Schwaninger A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Nov; 132(3):267-78. PubMed ID: 19712921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The importance of internal facial features in learning new faces.
    Longmore CA; Liu CH; Young AW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(2):249-60. PubMed ID: 25203612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How accurately do young children and adults discriminate the gender of natural faces?
    Sugimura T
    Percept Mot Skills; 2006 Jun; 102(3):654-64. PubMed ID: 16916145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Recovering faces from memory: the distracting influence of external facial features.
    Frowd CD; Skelton F; Atherton C; Pitchford M; Hepton G; Holden L; McIntyre AH; Hancock PJ
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2012 Jun; 18(2):224-38. PubMed ID: 22545929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An adaptation study of internal and external features in facial representations.
    Hills C; Romano K; Davies-Thompson J; Barton JJ
    Vision Res; 2014 Jul; 100():18-28. PubMed ID: 24747020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Internal versus external features in triggering the brain waveforms for conjunction and feature faces in recognition.
    Nie A; Jiang J; Fu Q
    Neuroreport; 2014 Aug; 25(12):965-71. PubMed ID: 25003951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Integration of internal and external facial features in 8- to 10-year-old children and adults.
    Meinhardt-Injac B; Persike M; Meinhardt G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jun; 149():96-105. PubMed ID: 24769271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Face processing and familiarity: evidence from eye-movement data.
    Stacey PC; Walker S; Underwood JD
    Br J Psychol; 2005 Nov; 96(Pt 4):407-22. PubMed ID: 16248933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Matching familiar and unfamiliar faces on internal and external features.
    Young AW; Hay DC; McWeeny KH; Flude BM; Ellis AW
    Perception; 1985; 14(6):737-46. PubMed ID: 3837875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Familiarity and Within-Person Facial Variability: The Importance of the Internal and External Features.
    Kramer RSS; Manesi Z; Towler A; Reynolds MG; Burton AM
    Perception; 2018 Jan; 47(1):3-15. PubMed ID: 28803526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attention misplaced: the role of diagnostic features in the face-inversion effect.
    Hills PJ; Ross DA; Lewis MB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Oct; 37(5):1396-406. PubMed ID: 21728458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The time course of face matching by internal and external features: Effects of context and inversion.
    Meinhardt-Injac B; Persike M; Meinhardt G
    Vision Res; 2010 Jul; 50(16):1598-611. PubMed ID: 20570594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Brain potentials and integration of external and internal features into face representations.
    Olivares EI; Iglesias J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Apr; 68(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 18295921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The first 100 milliseconds of a face: on the microgenesis of early face processing.
    Carbon CC
    Percept Mot Skills; 2011 Dec; 113(3):859-74. PubMed ID: 22403930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sex differences in unfamiliar face identification: evidence from matching tasks.
    Megreya AM; Bindemann M; Havard C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 May; 137(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 21459354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Revisiting the processing of internal and external features of unfamiliar faces: the headscarf effect.
    Megreya AM; Bindemann M
    Perception; 2009; 38(12):1831-48. PubMed ID: 20192132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Face learning and the emergence of view-independent face recognition: an event-related brain potential study.
    Zimmermann FG; Eimer M
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Jun; 51(7):1320-9. PubMed ID: 23583970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.