BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23896715)

  • 1. Interobserver agreement in the reporting of cervical biopsy specimens obtained from women screened by visual inspection with acetic acid and hybrid capture 2.
    Basu P; Kamal M; Ray C; Bhat D; Ghosh I; Mittal S; Chatterjee S; Samaddar A; Biswas J
    Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2013 Sep; 32(5):509-15. PubMed ID: 23896715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reproducibility of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia diagnosis on histological review of cervical punch biopsies from a visual inspection with acetic acid and HPV detection-based screening program.
    Mittal S; Ghosh I; Banerjee D; Singh P; Biswas J; Nijhawan R; Srinivasan R; Ray C; Basu P
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2014 Sep; 126(3):227-31. PubMed ID: 24947603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interobserver variation in the reporting of cervical colposcopic biopsy specimens: comparison of grading systems.
    McCluggage WG; Bharucha H; Caughley LM; Date A; Hamilton PW; Thornton CM; Walsh MY
    J Clin Pathol; 1996 Oct; 49(10):833-5. PubMed ID: 8943751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Random biopsy after colposcopy-directed biopsy improves the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse.
    Nam K; Chung S; Kwak J; Cha S; Kim J; Jeon S; Bae D
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2010 Oct; 14(4):346-51. PubMed ID: 20885163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Study of accuracy of colposcopy in VIA and HPV detection-based cervical cancer screening program.
    Ghosh I; Mittal S; Banerjee D; Singh P; Dasgupta S; Chatterjee S; Biswas J; Panda C; Basu P
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2014 Dec; 54(6):570-5. PubMed ID: 25476810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The increased detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia when using a second biopsy at colposcopy.
    van der Marel J; van Baars R; Rodriguez A; Quint WG; van de Sandt MM; Berkhof J; Schiffman M; Torné A; Ordi J; Jenkins D; Verheijen RH; Helmerhorst TJ; Ter Harmsel B; Wentzensen N; Del Pino M
    Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Nov; 135(2):201-7. PubMed ID: 25204846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Triage of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance with hybrid capture II: colposcopy and histologic human papillomavirus correlation.
    Lonky NM; Felix JC; Naidu YM; Wolde-Tsadik G
    Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Mar; 101(3):481-9. PubMed ID: 12636951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pathologist variation in reporting cervical borderline epithelial abnormalities and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Creagh T; Bridger JE; Kupek E; Fish DE; Martin-Bates E; Wilkins MJ
    J Clin Pathol; 1995 Jan; 48(1):59-60. PubMed ID: 7706521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of cytology and visual triage of human papillomavirus-positive women in cervical cancer prevention in India.
    Muwonge R; Wesley RS; Nene BM; Shastri SS; Jayant K; Malvi SG; Thara S; Sankaranarayanan R
    Int J Cancer; 2014 Jun; 134(12):2902-9. PubMed ID: 24272364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The accuracy of colposcopic biopsy: analyses from the placebo arm of the Gardasil clinical trials.
    Stoler MH; Vichnin MD; Ferenczy A; Ferris DG; Perez G; Paavonen J; Joura EA; Djursing H; Sigurdsson K; Jefferson L; Alvarez F; Sings HL; Lu S; James MK; Saah A; Haupt RM;
    Int J Cancer; 2011 Mar; 128(6):1354-62. PubMed ID: 20506504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The correlation between the grade of dyskaryosis on cervical smear, grade of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) on punch biopsy and the final histological diagnosis on cone biopsies of the cervix.
    Heatley MK; Bury JP
    Cytopathology; 1998 Apr; 9(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 9577735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of visual inspection with acetic acid in detecting high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in pre- and post-menopausal Thai women with minor cervical cytological abnormalities.
    Poomtavorn Y; Suwannarurk K
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(6):2327-31. PubMed ID: 25824759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnostic and Treatment Reproducibility of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia / Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion and Factors Affecting the Diagnosis.
    Sağlam A; Usubütün A; Dolgun A; Mutter GL; Salman MC; Kurtulan O; Akyol A; Özkan EA; Baykara S; Bülbül D; Calay Z; Eren F; Gümürdülü D; Haberal N; Ilvan Ş; Karaveli Ş; Koyuncuoğlu M; Müezzinoğlu B; Müftüoğlu KH; Özen Ö; Özdemir N; Peştereli E; Ulukuş Ç; Zekioğlu O
    Turk Patoloji Derg; 2017; 1(1):177-191. PubMed ID: 28832077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sensitivity of high-risk HPV Hybrid Capture II (hrHPV HC2) test using SurePath(TM) specimens in the prediction of cervical high-grade squamous lesions.
    Zhou F; Pulinthanathu R; Elgert P; Cangiarella J; Simsir A
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2015 May; 43(5):381-7. PubMed ID: 25546355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Review of the Bethesda System atlas does not improve reproducibility or accuracy in the classification of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance smears.
    Smith AE; Sherman ME; Scott DR; Tabbara SO; Dworkin L; Olson J; Thompson J; Faser C; Snell J; Schiffman M
    Cancer; 2000 Aug; 90(4):201-6. PubMed ID: 10966559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of atypical and low-grade cervical cytology in private practice.
    Nyirjesy I; Billingsley FS; Forman MR
    Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Oct; 92(4 Pt 1):601-7. PubMed ID: 9764636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Human papillomavirus testing as triage for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: sensitivity, specificity, and cost-effectiveness.
    Kaufman RH; Adam E; Icenogle J; Reeves WC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Oct; 177(4):930-6. PubMed ID: 9369847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interobserver reproducibility of cervical cytologic and histologic interpretations: realistic estimates from the ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study.
    Stoler MH; Schiffman M;
    JAMA; 2001 Mar; 285(11):1500-5. PubMed ID: 11255427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Discrepancy in the interpretation of cervical histology by gynecologic pathologists.
    Parker MF; Zahn CM; Vogel KM; Olsen CH; Miyazawa K; O'Connor DM
    Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Aug; 100(2):277-80. PubMed ID: 12151150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The CryoPop study: Screening for high-grade cervical dysplasia in Karnataka, India.
    Anderson JR; Yogeshkumar S; Lu E; Yenokyan G; Thaler K; Mensa M; Chikaraddi S; Lokare L; Gudadinni MR; Antartani R; Donimath K; Patil B; Bidri S; Goudar SS; Derman R; Dalal A;
    BJOG; 2023 Nov; 130 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):158-167. PubMed ID: 37932903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.