These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23896874)

  • 1. In vitro cytogenetic assays: chromosomal aberrations and micronucleus tests.
    Mosesso P; Cinelli S; Natarajan AT; Palitti F
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1044():123-46. PubMed ID: 23896874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In Vitro Cytogenetic Assays: Chromosomal Aberrations and Micronucleus Tests.
    Mosesso P; Cinelli S
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 2031():79-104. PubMed ID: 31473955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cytogenetic in vivo assays in somatic cells.
    Doherty AT; Baumgartner A; Anderson D
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 817():271-304. PubMed ID: 22147578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cytogenetic methods in human biomonitoring: principles and uses.
    Mateuca RA; Decordier I; Kirsch-Volders M
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 817():305-34. PubMed ID: 22147579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cytogenetic evaluation for the genotoxicity of bisphenol-A in Chinese hamster ovary cells.
    Xin L; Lin Y; Wang A; Zhu W; Liang Y; Su X; Hong C; Wan J; Wang Y; Tian H
    Environ Toxicol Pharmacol; 2015 Sep; 40(2):524-9. PubMed ID: 26318564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Chromosomal aberration test in human lymphocytes.
    Johannes C; Obe G
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1044():165-78. PubMed ID: 23896876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Human population studies with cytogenetic biomarkers: review of the literature and future prospectives.
    Bonassi S; Ugolini D; Kirsch-Volders M; Strömberg U; Vermeulen R; Tucker JD
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 2005; 45(2-3):258-70. PubMed ID: 15688363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cytogenetic methods in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
    Haferlach C; Bacher U
    Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 730():119-30. PubMed ID: 21431638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detailed data on in vitro MNT and in vitro CA: industrial experience.
    Albertini S; Miller B; Chételat AA; Locher F
    Mutat Res; 1997 Aug; 392(1-2):187-208. PubMed ID: 9269342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Functional cell-cycle chromatin conformation changes in the presence of DNA damage result into chromatid breaks: a new insight in the formation of radiation-induced chromosomal aberrations based on the direct observation of interphase chromatin.
    Pantelias GE; Terzoudi GI
    Mutat Res; 2010 Aug; 701(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 20398788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cytogenetic analyses of Azadirachtin reveal absence of genotoxicity but marked antiproliferative effects in human lymphocytes and CHO cells in vitro.
    Mosesso P; Bohm L; Pepe G; Fiore M; Carpinelli A; Gäde G; Nagini S; Ottavianelli A; Degrassi F
    Toxicol Lett; 2012 Sep; 213(3):361-6. PubMed ID: 22885097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Studies for a genotoxic potential of some endogenous and exogenous sex steroids. II. Communication: examination for the induction of cytogenetic damage using the chromosomal aberration assay on human lymphocytes in vitro and the mouse bone marrow micronucleus test in vivo.
    Reimann R; Kalweit S; Lang R
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 1996; 28(2):133-44. PubMed ID: 8844995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro micronucleus assay for the analysis of total particulate matter in cigarette smoke: comparison of flow cytometry and laser scanning cytometry with microscopy.
    Yao J; Gao Q; Mi Q; Li X; Miao M; Cheng P; Luo Y
    Mutat Res; 2013 Aug; 755(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 23770001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genotoxicity assessment of an energetic propellant compound, 3-nitro-1,2,4-triazol-5-one (NTO).
    Reddy G; Song J; Kirby P; Lent EM; Crouse LC; Johnson MS
    Mutat Res; 2011 Feb; 719(1-2):35-40. PubMed ID: 21094274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Chromosomal Aberration Test in Human Lymphocytes.
    Johannes C; Obe G
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 2031():121-134. PubMed ID: 31473957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The in vitro micronucleus assay and kinetochore staining: methodology and criteria for the accurate assessment of genotoxicity and cytotoxicity.
    Manshian BB; Singh N; Doak SH
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1044():269-89. PubMed ID: 23896882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of LET on the yield and quality of chromosomal damage in metaphase cells: a time-course study.
    Ritter S; Nasonova E; Gudowska-Novak E
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2002 Mar; 78(3):191-202. PubMed ID: 11869474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of in vivo cytogenetic toxicity of europium hydroxide nanorods (EHNs) in male and female Swiss albino mice.
    Bollu VS; Nethi SK; Dasari RK; Rao SS; Misra S; Patra CR
    Nanotoxicology; 2016; 10(4):413-25. PubMed ID: 26444710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cytogenetic risk assessment of etoposide from mouse bone marrow.
    Choudhury RC; Palo AK; Sahu P
    J Appl Toxicol; 2004; 24(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 15052606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Original molecular cytogenetic approach to determining spontaneous chromosomal mutations in the interphase cells to evaluate the mutagenic activity of environmental factors].
    Iurov IIu; Vorsanova SG; Solov'ev IV; Iurov IuB
    Gig Sanit; 2011; (5):90-4. PubMed ID: 22185015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.