These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23897862)

  • 1. A hybrid approach to achieving both marginal and conditional balances for stratification variables in sequential clinical trials.
    Lin Y; Su Z
    Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(5):275-81. PubMed ID: 23897862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inefficiency of randomization methods that balance on stratum margins and improvements with permuted blocks and a sequential method.
    Kaiser LD
    Stat Med; 2012 Jul; 31(16):1699-706. PubMed ID: 22437508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Balancing continuous and categorical baseline covariates in sequential clinical trials using the area between empirical cumulative distribution functions.
    Lin Y; Su Z
    Stat Med; 2012 Aug; 31(18):1961-71. PubMed ID: 22532082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dynamic balancing randomization in controlled clinical trials.
    Heritier S; Gebski V; Pillai A
    Stat Med; 2005 Dec; 24(24):3729-41. PubMed ID: 16320277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of stratification and adaptive methods for treatment allocation in an acute stroke clinical trial.
    Weir CJ; Lees KR
    Stat Med; 2003 Mar; 22(5):705-26. PubMed ID: 12587101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Issues for stratified randomization based on a factor derived from a continuous baseline variable.
    Qu Y
    Pharm Stat; 2011; 10(3):232-5. PubMed ID: 20922820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Balancing continuous covariates based on Kernel densities.
    Ma Z; Hu F
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2013 Mar; 34(2):262-9. PubMed ID: 23270935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Balancing multiple baseline characteristics in randomized clinical trials.
    Su Z
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2011 Jul; 32(4):547-50. PubMed ID: 21382510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The benefit of stratification in clinical trials revisited.
    Ganju J; Zhou K
    Stat Med; 2011 Oct; 30(24):2881-9. PubMed ID: 21905064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adjusting for differential proportions of second-line treatment in cancer clinical trials. Part I: structural nested models and marginal structural models to test and estimate treatment arm effects.
    Yamaguchi T; Ohashi Y
    Stat Med; 2004 Jul; 23(13):1991-2003. PubMed ID: 15211598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Minimal sufficient balance-a new strategy to balance baseline covariates and preserve randomness of treatment allocation.
    Zhao W; Hill MD; Palesch Y
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2015 Dec; 24(6):989-1002. PubMed ID: 22287602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of simulation to compare the performance of minimization with stratified blocked randomization.
    Toorawa R; Adena M; Donovan M; Jones S; Conlon J
    Pharm Stat; 2009; 8(4):264-78. PubMed ID: 18756580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Permutation test following covariate-adaptive randomization in randomized controlled trials.
    Hasegawa T; Tango T
    J Biopharm Stat; 2009; 19(1):106-19. PubMed ID: 19127470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stratified randomization for clinical trials.
    Kernan WN; Viscoli CM; Makuch RW; Brass LM; Horwitz RI
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1999 Jan; 52(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 9973070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How to Balance Prognostic Factors in Controlled Phase II Trials: Stratified Permuted Block Randomization or Minimization? An Analysis of Clinical Trials in Digestive Oncology.
    Martin E; Le Malicot K; Guérin-Charbonnel C; Bocquet F; Bouché O; Turpin A; Aparicio T; Legoux JL; Dahan L; Taieb J; Lepage C; Dourthe LM; Pétorin C; Bourgeois V; Raoul JL; Seegers V
    Curr Oncol; 2024 Jun; 31(6):3513-3528. PubMed ID: 38920742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantifying the exact allocation ratios in randomized clinical trials with biased coin randomization.
    Lin Y; Su Z
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2012 Oct; 108(1):197-202. PubMed ID: 22607968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preserving the allocation ratio at every allocation with biased coin randomization and minimization in studies with unequal allocation.
    Kuznetsova OM; Tymofyeyev Y
    Stat Med; 2012 Apr; 31(8):701-23. PubMed ID: 22161821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Randomization with a posteriori constraints: description and properties.
    Gicquel S; Marion-Gallois R
    Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(27):5033-45. PubMed ID: 17721873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sequential covariate-adjusted randomization via hierarchically minimizing Mahalanobis distance and marginal imbalance.
    Yang H; Qin Y; Li Y; Hu F
    Biometrics; 2024 Mar; 80(2):. PubMed ID: 38801258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stratification of randomization is not required for a pre-specified subgroup analysis.
    Kaiser LD
    Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 23281052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.