BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23898257)

  • 1. Unfair offers, unfair offenders? Fairness considerations in incarcerated individuals with and without psychopathy.
    Radke S; Brazil IA; Scheper I; Bulten BH; de Bruijn ER
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2013; 7():406. PubMed ID: 23898257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Abnormal emotion processing, but intact fairness and intentionality considerations during social decision-making in schizophrenia.
    de la Asuncion J; Docx L; Sabbe B; Morrens M; de Bruijn ER
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1058. PubMed ID: 26257699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Behavioral and electrophysiological responses to fairness norm violations in antisocial offenders.
    Mayer SV; Rauss K; Pourtois G; Jusyte A; Schönenberg M
    Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci; 2019 Sep; 269(6):731-740. PubMed ID: 29397410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of group affiliation on neural signatures of fairness norm violations in antisocial violent offenders.
    Scheeff J; Rauss K; Schönenberg M
    Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry; 2021 Dec; 111():110355. PubMed ID: 34004194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do different fairness contexts and facial emotions motivate 'irrational' social decision-making in major depression? An exploratory patient study.
    Radke S; Schäfer IC; Müller BW; de Bruijn ER
    Psychiatry Res; 2013 Dec; 210(2):438-43. PubMed ID: 23910237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Altered economic decision-making in abstinent heroin addicts: Evidence from the ultimatum game.
    Hou Y; Zhao L; Yao Q; Ding L
    Neurosci Lett; 2016 Aug; 627():148-54. PubMed ID: 27264486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Selective Fair Behavior as a Function of Psychopathic Traits in a Subclinical Population.
    Osumi T; Ohira H
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1604. PubMed ID: 28955290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. There's something about a fair split: intentionality moderates context-based fairness considerations in social decision-making.
    Radke S; Güroğlu B; de Bruijn ER
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(2):e31491. PubMed ID: 22363656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Unfair? It depends: neural correlates of fairness in social context.
    Güroğlu B; van den Bos W; Rombouts SA; Crone EA
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2010 Dec; 5(4):414-23. PubMed ID: 20350933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The other side of the coin: oxytocin decreases the adherence to fairness norms.
    Radke S; de Bruijn ER
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2012; 6():193. PubMed ID: 22754520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Altered neural responses to social fairness in bipolar disorder.
    Lois G; Schneider EE; Kaurin A; Wessa M
    Neuroimage Clin; 2020; 28():102487. PubMed ID: 33395978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Distinct neural activation patterns underlie economic decisions in high and low psychopathy scorers.
    Vieira JB; Almeida PR; Ferreira-Santos F; Barbosa F; Marques-Teixeira J; Marsh AA
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2014 Aug; 9(8):1099-107. PubMed ID: 23748499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fairness norm violations in anti-social psychopathic offenders in a repeated trust game.
    Rosenberger LA; Pfabigan DM; Lehner B; Keckeis K; Seidel EM; Eisenegger C; Lamm C
    Transl Psychiatry; 2019 Oct; 9(1):266. PubMed ID: 31636249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Outcomes versus intentions in fairness-related decision making: School-aged children's decisions are just like those of adults.
    Jaroslawska AJ; McCormack T; Burns P; Caruso EM
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2020 Jan; 189():104704. PubMed ID: 31634734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Social Support Modulates Neural Responses to Unfairness in the Ultimatum Game.
    Wei C; Zheng L; Che L; Cheng X; Li L; Guo X
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():182. PubMed ID: 29515497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Social value orientation modulates fairness processing during social decision-making: evidence from behavior and brain potentials.
    Hu X; Mai X
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2021 Jul; 16(7):670-682. PubMed ID: 33769539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Power to Punish Norm Violations Affects the Neural Processes of Fairness-Related Decision Making.
    Cheng X; Zheng L; Li L; Guo X; Wang Q; Lord A; Hu Z; Yang G
    Front Behav Neurosci; 2015; 9():344. PubMed ID: 26696858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Processing of fair and unfair offers in the ultimatum game under social observation.
    Peterburs J; Voegler R; Liepelt R; Schulze A; Wilhelm S; Ocklenburg S; Straube T
    Sci Rep; 2017 Mar; 7():44062. PubMed ID: 28276510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Salivary alpha-amylase levels and rejection of unfair offers in the ultimatum game.
    Takagishi H; Fujii T; Kameshima S; Koizumi M; Takahashi T
    Neuro Endocrinol Lett; 2009; 30(5):643-6. PubMed ID: 20035253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Counterfactual comparison modulates fairness consideration in the mini-ultimatum game: an event-related potentials study.
    Liang J; Lin H; Xiang J; Wu H; Li X; Liang H; Zheng X
    Scand J Psychol; 2015 Apr; 56(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 25586113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.