These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23898597)

  • 41. Validation of the Australian Midwifery Standards Assessment Tool (AMSAT): A tool to assess midwifery competence.
    Sweet L; Bazargan M; McKellar L; Gray J; Henderson A
    Women Birth; 2018 Feb; 31(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 28784275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Developing a successful nursing Objective Structured Clinical Examination.
    McWilliam P; Botwinski C
    J Nurs Educ; 2010 Jan; 49(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 19954138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Testing objective structured clinical evaluation (OSCE) for nursing students experience developed during the years 1995-2009].
    Sola Pola M; Martínez Castela D; Molins I Mesalles A; Pulpón Segura AM
    Rev Enferm; 2011; 34(7-8):32-9. PubMed ID: 21919384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Medical students review of formative OSCE scores, checklists, and videos improves with student-faculty debriefing meetings.
    Bernard AW; Ceccolini G; Feinn R; Rockfeld J; Rosenberg I; Thomas L; Cassese T
    Med Educ Online; 2017; 22(1):1324718. PubMed ID: 28521646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Implementation of a key skills agenda within an undergraduate programme of midwifery studies.
    Dixon A; Donovan P
    Nurse Educ Today; 2004 Aug; 24(6):483-90. PubMed ID: 15312958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. EN to RN: the transition experience pre- and post-graduation.
    Rapley PA; Nathan P; Davidson L
    Rural Remote Health; 2006; 6(1):363. PubMed ID: 16526933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Nursing student and professor perceptions and assessments of the achievement of practicum competencies: A mixed method approach.
    Fuentes-Pumarola C; Ballester-Ferrando D; Gelabert-Vilella S; Bosch-Farré C; Malagón-Aguilera MC; Rascón-Hernán C; Bonmatí-Tomàs A; Fernandez-Peña R
    Nurse Educ Today; 2016 Oct; 45():199-205. PubMed ID: 27552714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Failing underperforming students: the role of grading in practice assessment.
    Heaslip V; Scammell JM
    Nurse Educ Pract; 2012 Mar; 12(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 21907621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparative analysis between objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) and conventional examination (CE) as a formative evaluation tool in Pediatrics in semester examination for final MBBS students.
    Mondal R; Sarkar S; Nandi M; Hazra A
    Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ); 2012; 10(37):62-5. PubMed ID: 22971865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Asssessment of practice in intensive care: students' perceptions of a clinical competence assessment tool.
    Hanley E; Higgins A
    Intensive Crit Care Nurs; 2005 Oct; 21(5):276-83. PubMed ID: 16182124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A comparative study of assessment grading and nursing students' perceptions of quality in sessional and tenured teachers.
    Salamonson Y; Halcomb EJ; Andrew S; Peters K; Jackson D
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2010 Dec; 42(4):423-9. PubMed ID: 21091625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Experiences with objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) as a tool for formative evaluation in pediatrics.
    Verma M; Singh T
    Indian Pediatr; 1993 May; 30(5):699-702. PubMed ID: 8282405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Identifying strengths and weaknesses in the utilization of Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) in a nursing program.
    McWilliam PL; Botwinski CA
    Nurs Educ Perspect; 2012; 33(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 22416539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The objective structured clinical examination (OSCE): optimising its value in the undergraduate nursing curriculum.
    Mitchell ML; Henderson A; Groves M; Dalton M; Nulty D
    Nurse Educ Today; 2009 May; 29(4):398-404. PubMed ID: 19056152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Strengthening partnerships: The involvement of health care providers in the evaluation of authentic assessment within midwifery undergraduate education.
    Carter AG; Sidebotham M; Creedy DK; Fenwick J; Gamble J
    Nurse Educ Pract; 2015 Jul; 15(4):327-32. PubMed ID: 25701291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Exploring the assessors' and nurses' experience of formal assessment of clinical competency in the administration of blood components.
    Pirie ES; Gray MA
    Nurse Educ Pract; 2007 Jul; 7(4):215-27. PubMed ID: 17689447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Oncology nursing students' views of a modified OSCE.
    Furlong E; Fox P; Lavin M; Collins R
    Eur J Oncol Nurs; 2005 Dec; 9(4):351-9. PubMed ID: 16027036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The validity and reliability of methods to assess the competence to practise of pre-registration nursing and midwifery students.
    Norman IJ; Watson R; Murrells T; Calman L; Redfern S
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2002 Feb; 39(2):133-45. PubMed ID: 11755444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Validation of the tool assessment of clinical education (AssCE): A study using Delphi method and clinical experts.
    Löfmark A; Mårtensson G
    Nurse Educ Today; 2017 Mar; 50():82-86. PubMed ID: 28033551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The midwifery miniCEX--a valuable clinical assessment tool for midwifery education.
    Sweet LP; Glover P; McPhee T
    Nurse Educ Pract; 2013 Mar; 13(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 23044360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.