207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23899250)
1. An effective multisource informed consent procedure for research and clinical practice: an observational study of patient understanding and awareness of their roles as research stakeholders in a cancer biobank.
Cervo S; Rovina J; Talamini R; Perin T; Canzonieri V; De Paoli P; Steffan A
BMC Med Ethics; 2013 Jul; 14():30. PubMed ID: 23899250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.
Perrenoud B; Velonaki VS; Bodenmann P; Ramelet AS
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Oct; 13(10):82-94. PubMed ID: 26571285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Research participants' perceptions and views on consent for biobank research: a review of empirical data and ethical analysis.
D'Abramo F; Schildmann J; Vollmann J
BMC Med Ethics; 2015 Sep; 16():60. PubMed ID: 26354520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Exploring Understanding of "Understanding": The Paradigm Case of Biobank Consent Comprehension.
Beskow LM; Weinfurt KP
Am J Bioeth; 2019 May; 19(5):6-18. PubMed ID: 31068107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluating the quality of informed consent and contemporary clinical practices by medical doctors in South Africa: an empirical study.
Chima SC
BMC Med Ethics; 2013; 14 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S3. PubMed ID: 24564932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Recall and Retention of Consent Procedure Contents and Decisions: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Rebers S; Vermeulen E; Brandenburg AP; Aaronson NK; Schmidt MK
Public Health Genomics; 2018; 21(1-2):27-36. PubMed ID: 30199881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reconsidering the value of consent in biobank research.
Allen J; McNamara B
Bioethics; 2011 Mar; 25(3):155-66. PubMed ID: 19659851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Recommendations in relation to the EU clinical trials directive and medical research involving incapacitated adults.
Liddell K; Kompanje EJ; Lemaire F; Vrhovac B; Menon DK; Bion J; Chamberlain D; Wiedermann CJ; Druml C;
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2006 Apr; 118(5-6):183-91. PubMed ID: 16773486
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Improved informed consent documents for biomedical research do not increase patients' understanding but reduce enrolment: a study in real settings.
Paris A; Deygas B; Cornu C; Thalamas C; Maison P; Duale C; Kane M; Hodaj E; Cracowski JL
Br J Clin Pharmacol; 2015 Nov; 80(5):1010-20. PubMed ID: 26147763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. "Because I want to be informed, to be part of the decision-making": Patients' insights on informed consent practices by healthcare professionals in South Africa.
Chima SC
Niger J Clin Pract; 2015 Dec; 18 Suppl():S46-56. PubMed ID: 26620622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Informed consent for biobanking: consensus-based guidelines for adequate comprehension.
Beskow LM; Dombeck CB; Thompson CP; Watson-Ormond JK; Weinfurt KP
Genet Med; 2015 Mar; 17(3):226-33. PubMed ID: 25144889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing the quality of informed consent in a resource-limited setting: a cross-sectional study.
Kiguba R; Kutyabami P; Kiwuwa S; Katabira E; Sewankambo NK
BMC Med Ethics; 2012 Aug; 13():21. PubMed ID: 22906301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biobank Participants' Attitudes toward Requiring Understanding for Biobank Consent.
Kasperbauer TJ; Halverson C; Garcia A; Schmidt KK; Schwartz PH
Ethics Hum Res; 2022 Jan; 44(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 34936236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Are there adverse consequences of quizzing during informed consent for HIV research?
Sugarman J; Corneli A; Donnell D; Liu TY; Rose S; Celentano D; Jackson B; Aramrattana A; Wei L; Shao Y; Liping F; Baoling R; Dye B; Metzger D
J Med Ethics; 2011 Nov; 37(11):693-7. PubMed ID: 21653649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ethics of dead participants: policy recommendations for biobank research.
Ursin L; Stuifbergen M
J Med Ethics; 2018 Oct; 44(10):695-699. PubMed ID: 29921618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Procedures of recruiting, obtaining informed consent, and compensating research participants in Qatar: findings from a qualitative investigation.
Killawi A; Khidir A; Elnashar M; Abdelrahim H; Hammoud M; Elliott H; Thurston M; Asad H; Al-Khal AL; Fetters MD
BMC Med Ethics; 2014 Feb; 15():9. PubMed ID: 24495499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interactive multimedia consent for biobanking: a randomized trial.
Simon CM; Klein DW; Schartz HA
Genet Med; 2016 Jan; 18(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 25834945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A qualitative study of participants' views on re-consent in a longitudinal biobank.
Dixon-Woods M; Kocman D; Brewster L; Willars J; Laurie G; Tarrant C
BMC Med Ethics; 2017 Mar; 18(1):22. PubMed ID: 28330487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Any progress in informed consenting for cancer treatment? Results from a cross sectional analysis at a comprehensive cancer center.
Schwaegermann MK; Schranz M; Moehler M; Labenz C; Moringlane A; Schmidt M; Theobald M; Hess G
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2021 Jul; 147(7):2117-2126. PubMed ID: 33420813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Informed consent, biobank research, and locality: perceptions of breast cancer patients in three European countries.
Petersen I; Desmedt C; Harris A; Buffa F; Kollek R
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2014 Jul; 9(3):48-55. PubMed ID: 25746784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
