These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23899773)

  • 1. Comparison of direct boiling method with commercial kits for extracting fecal microbiome DNA by Illumina sequencing of 16S rRNA tags.
    Peng X; Yu KQ; Deng GH; Jiang YX; Wang Y; Zhang GX; Zhou HW
    J Microbiol Methods; 2013 Dec; 95(3):455-62. PubMed ID: 23899773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of DNA extraction, sample dilution, and reagent contamination on 16S rRNA gene sequencing of human feces.
    Velásquez-Mejía EP; de la Cuesta-Zuluaga J; Escobar JS
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2018 Jan; 102(1):403-411. PubMed ID: 29079861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. High-throughput DNA extraction strategy for fecal microbiome studies.
    Isokääntä H; Tomnikov N; Vanhatalo S; Munukka E; Huovinen P; Hakanen AJ; Kallonen T
    Microbiol Spectr; 2024 Jun; 12(6):e0293223. PubMed ID: 38747618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Protocols for metagenomic DNA extraction and Illumina amplicon library preparation for faecal and swab samples.
    Vo AT; Jedlicka JA
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2014 Nov; 14(6):1183-97. PubMed ID: 24774752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of a modified phenol/chloroform and commercial-kit methods for extracting DNA from horse fecal material.
    Janabi AHD; Kerkhof LJ; McGuinness LR; Biddle AS; McKeever KH
    J Microbiol Methods; 2016 Oct; 129():14-19. PubMed ID: 27460337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Direct PCR Offers a Fast and Reliable Alternative to Conventional DNA Isolation Methods for Gut Microbiomes.
    Videvall E; Strandh M; Engelbrecht A; Cloete S; Cornwallis CK
    mSystems; 2017; 2(6):. PubMed ID: 29181448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An Improved Methodology to Overcome Key Issues in Human Fecal Metagenomic DNA Extraction.
    Kumar J; Kumar M; Gupta S; Ahmed V; Bhambi M; Pandey R; Chauhan NS
    Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics; 2016 Dec; 14(6):371-378. PubMed ID: 27888152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Semi-automated extraction of microbial DNA from feces for qPCR and phylogenetic microarray analysis.
    Nylund L; Heilig HG; Salminen S; de Vos WM; Satokari R
    J Microbiol Methods; 2010 Nov; 83(2):231-5. PubMed ID: 20849891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Gut Microbiota Analysis Results Are Highly Dependent on the 16S rRNA Gene Target Region, Whereas the Impact of DNA Extraction Is Minor.
    Rintala A; Pietilä S; Munukka E; Eerola E; Pursiheimo JP; Laiho A; Pekkala S; Huovinen P
    J Biomol Tech; 2017 Apr; 28(1):19-30. PubMed ID: 28260999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability of a participant-friendly fecal collection method for microbiome analyses: a step towards large sample size investigation.
    Szopinska JW; Gresse R; van der Marel S; Boekhorst J; Lukovac S; van Swam I; Franke B; Timmerman H; Belzer C; Arias Vasquez A
    BMC Microbiol; 2018 Sep; 18(1):110. PubMed ID: 30189859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sampling and pyrosequencing methods for characterizing bacterial communities in the human gut using 16S sequence tags.
    Wu GD; Lewis JD; Hoffmann C; Chen YY; Knight R; Bittinger K; Hwang J; Chen J; Berkowsky R; Nessel L; Li H; Bushman FD
    BMC Microbiol; 2010 Jul; 10():206. PubMed ID: 20673359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of DNA extraction methods for human gut microbial community profiling.
    Lim MY; Song EJ; Kim SH; Lee J; Nam YD
    Syst Appl Microbiol; 2018 Mar; 41(2):151-157. PubMed ID: 29305057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of the impact of different fecal storage protocols on the microbiota diversity and composition: a pilot study.
    Moossavi S; Engen PA; Ghanbari R; Green SJ; Naqib A; Bishehsari F; Merat S; Poustchi H; Keshavarzian A; Malekzadeh R
    BMC Microbiol; 2019 Jun; 19(1):145. PubMed ID: 31253096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fecal microbiota analysis: an overview of sample collection methods and sequencing strategies.
    Thomas V; Clark J; Doré J
    Future Microbiol; 2015; 10(9):1485-504. PubMed ID: 26347019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Characterization of the fecal bacteria communities of forage-fed horses by pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA V4 gene amplicons.
    Shepherd ML; Swecker WS; Jensen RV; Ponder MA
    FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2012 Jan; 326(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 22092776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Enhanced microbial diversity in the saliva microbiome induced by short-term probiotic intake revealed by 16S rRNA sequencing on the IonTorrent PGM platform.
    Dassi E; Ballarini A; Covello G; ; Quattrone A; Jousson O; De Sanctis V; Bertorelli R; Denti MA; Segata N
    J Biotechnol; 2014 Nov; 190():30-9. PubMed ID: 24670254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An alternative storage method for characterization of the intestinal microbiota through next generation sequencing.
    Ribeiro RM; Souza-Basqueira M; Oliveira LC; Salles FC; Pereira NB; Sabino EC
    Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo; 2018 Nov; 60():e77. PubMed ID: 30517247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of preservation method on spider monkey (Ateles geoffroyi) fecal microbiota over 8 weeks.
    Hale VL; Tan CL; Knight R; Amato KR
    J Microbiol Methods; 2015 Jun; 113():16-26. PubMed ID: 25819008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Methodology challenges in studying human gut microbiota - effects of collection, storage, DNA extraction and next generation sequencing technologies.
    Panek M; Čipčić Paljetak H; Barešić A; Perić M; Matijašić M; Lojkić I; Vranešić Bender D; Krznarić Ž; Verbanac D
    Sci Rep; 2018 Mar; 8(1):5143. PubMed ID: 29572539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fecal Aliquot Straw Technique (FAST) allows for easy and reproducible subsampling: assessing interpersonal variation in trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO) accumulation.
    Romano KA; Dill-McFarland KA; Kasahara K; Kerby RL; Vivas EI; Amador-Noguez D; Herd P; Rey FE
    Microbiome; 2018 May; 6(1):91. PubMed ID: 29776435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.