These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

54 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23900437)

  • 1. A contrast enhancement filter for improving stent visibility in interventional X-ray fluoroscopy: an initial study.
    Jiang Y; Chang LH
    Int J Comput Biol Drug Des; 2013; 6(3):221-33. PubMed ID: 23900437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Technical advances of interventional fluoroscopy and flat panel image receptor.
    Lin PJ
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):650-7. PubMed ID: 18849699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implementation of region-of-interest fluoroscopy by using the road mapping mode of a real-time digital radiographic unit.
    Rudin S; Bednarek DR; Guterman LR; Hopkins LN; Wakhloo AK; Fletcher LM; Massoumzadeh P
    Radiographics; 1995 Nov; 15(6):1465-70. PubMed ID: 8577969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Advanced visibility enhancement for stents and other devices: image processing aspects.
    Schoonenberg G; Florent R
    Cardiol Clin; 2009 Aug; 27(3):477-90. PubMed ID: 19573719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perception of temporally filtered X-ray fluoroscopy images.
    Wilson DL; Jabri KN; Aufrichtig R
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1999 Jan; 18(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 10193694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Reduction of the radiation exposure of patients caused by selected interventional and angiographic procedures].
    Seifert H; el-Jamal A; Roth R; Urbanczyk K; Kramann B
    Rofo; 2000 Dec; 172(12):1057-64. PubMed ID: 11199435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimization of detector pixel size for stent visualization in x-ray fluoroscopy.
    Jiang Y; Wilson DL
    Med Phys; 2006 Mar; 33(3):668-78. PubMed ID: 16878570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Subjective and objective measures of image quality in digital fluoroscopy.
    Walsh C; Dowling A; Meade A; Malone J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):34-7. PubMed ID: 16461534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radiopaque markers in endovascular stents--benefit and potential hazards.
    Wiskirchen J; Venugopalan R; Holton AD; König C; Kramer U; Trübenbach J; Tepe G; Claussen CD; Duda SH
    Rofo; 2003 Apr; 175(4):484-8. PubMed ID: 12677502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Changing from image intensifier to flat detector technology for interventional cardiology procedures: a practical point of view.
    Bokou C; Schreiner-Karoussou A; Breisch R; Beissel J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):83-6. PubMed ID: 18448437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Real-time 3D reconstruction of guidewires and stents using two update X-ray projections in a rotating imaging setup.
    Vöth T; Koenig T; Eulig E; Knaup M; Wiesmann V; Hörndler K; Kachelrieß M
    Med Phys; 2023 Sep; 50(9):5312-5330. PubMed ID: 37458680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiation dose levels during interventional cardiology procedures in a tertiary care hospital.
    Dragusin O; Desmet W; Heidbuchel H; Padovani R; Bosmans H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):231-5. PubMed ID: 16461493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radiopacity of current endovascular stents: evaluation in a multiple reader phantom study.
    Wiskirchen J; Kraemer K; König C; Kramer U; Trübenbach J; Wersebe A; Tepe G; Dietz K; Claussen CD; Duda SH
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2004 Aug; 15(8):843-52. PubMed ID: 15297588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dose performance evaluation of a charge coupled device and a flat-panel digital fluoroscopy system recently installed in an interventional cardiology laboratory.
    Tsapaki V; Kottou S; Kollaros N; Dafnomili P; Kyriakidis Z; Neofotistou V
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 15266080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vivo evaluation of the carotid wallstent on three-dimensional contrast material-enhanced MR angiography: influence of artifacts on the visibility of stent lumina.
    Borisch I; Hamer OW; Zorger N; Feuerbach S; Link J
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2005 May; 16(5):669-77. PubMed ID: 15872322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perceptual comparison of pulsed and continuous fluoroscopy.
    Aufrichtig R; Xue P; Thomas CW; Gilmore GC; Wilson DL
    Med Phys; 1994 Feb; 21(2):245-56. PubMed ID: 8177157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Guide-wire tracking during endovascular interventions.
    Baert SA; Viergever MA; Niessen WJ
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Aug; 22(8):965-72. PubMed ID: 12906251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interventional tool tracking using discrete optimization.
    Heibel H; Glocker B; Groher M; Pfister M; Navab N
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2013 Mar; 32(3):544-55. PubMed ID: 23232412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comprehensive study of stent visualization enhancement in X-ray images by image processing means.
    Bismuth V; Vaillant R; Funck F; Guillard N; Najman L
    Med Image Anal; 2011 Aug; 15(4):565-76. PubMed ID: 21530360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative assessment of image quality enhancement due to unsharp-mask processing in x-ray fluoroscopy.
    Jabri KN; Wilson DL
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2002 Jul; 19(7):1297-307. PubMed ID: 12095197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.