These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2390140)
1. The impact of PROs on orthopaedic practice. Nichols JC Orthop Rev; 1990 Jan; 19(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 2390140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. PROs to deny payment for substandard quality care. Banach J J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1989 May; 60(5):18-9. PubMed ID: 10303483 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Review: feedback about practice patterns for measurable improvements in quality of care--a challenge for PROs under the Health Care Quality Improvement Program. Hayes RP; Ballard DJ Clin Perform Qual Health Care; 1995; 3(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 10141395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Strategies for appeals of PRO payment denials. Manning MM; Miller WJ Med Staff Couns; 1990; 4(4):21-5. PubMed ID: 10107508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Medicare program; Peer Review Organizations: new PRO contracts for all states and territories and the District of Columbia--HCFA. Notice. Fed Regist; 1993 Mar; 58(39):12042-7. PubMed ID: 10124395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. PRO denial of payment for substandard care: a flawed federal initiative. Blau ML Healthspan; 1989 May; 6(5):8-10. PubMed ID: 10303546 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Providers question PROs' effectiveness. Critics contend peer review organizations are too costly and fail to improve the quality of care. Rothschild RD Health Prog; 1992; 73(6):28-32, 38. PubMed ID: 10119535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Health Care Quality Improvement Program: the WVMI returns to its founding mission. Weeks HS W V Med J; 1994 Apr; 90(4):138-9. PubMed ID: 8009870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The new scope of work: what it means to PROs and providers. Siegel SH Healthc Financ Manage; 1986 Aug; 40(8):64-8. PubMed ID: 10277300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Managing the academic orthopaedic practice as a business. Schaffer JL; Zembo MM; Hamilton JJ; Isenman AW Instr Course Lect; 2006; 55():663-73. PubMed ID: 16958500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. PROs and poor quality medical care--they can't sanction it until they define it! Chenen AR Med Staff Couns; 1988; 2(2):25-33. PubMed ID: 10302314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Proposed Medicare regulations: denial of payment for substandard quality care and review of beneficiary complaints. Cummins JR Ky Hosp Mag; 1989; 6(4):22, 24, 26. PubMed ID: 10304158 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Orthopaedic traumatology: the hospital side of the ledger, defining the financial relationship between physicians and hospitals. Vallier HA; Patterson BM; Meehan CJ; Lombardo T J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Apr; 22(4):221-6. PubMed ID: 18404029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Medicare and Medicaid programs; entities performing quality of care review of services provided by risk-basis health maintenance organizations and competitive medical plans--HCFA. Final rule with comment period. Fed Regist; 1987 Oct; 52(194):37454-8. PubMed ID: 10301903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. West Virginia Medical Institute: the Quality Improvement Organization for West Virginia. Brehm JG; Smith SM W V Med J; 2004; 100(5):178-80. PubMed ID: 15617461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hospitals anxious over payment denials for quality. Burda D Hospitals; 1987 Jun; 61(12):48, 53. PubMed ID: 3294566 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Texas Medical Foundation strives for quality medical care. Fitch JF Tex Med; 1989 Mar; 85(3):67-8. PubMed ID: 2652370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]