These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2390140)

  • 21. Can PROs uncover quality concerns?
    Magoffin CJ
    Bus Health; 1986; 3(8):14-6. PubMed ID: 10300896
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The role of the principal clinical coordinator in the Health Care Financing Administration's Health Care Quality Improvement Initiative.
    Elward KS; Martin D; Merwin E; Hayes RP; Ballard DJ
    Clin Perform Qual Health Care; 1994; 2(2):73-9. PubMed ID: 10161149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. How I fight back when the PRO says "No".
    Davant C
    Med Econ; 1988 Oct; 65(20):40-4. PubMed ID: 10302812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Managing orthopedics and neurosciences costs through standard treatment protocols.
    McGinnity ES; Pluth TE
    Hosp Technol Ser; 1994 Jun; 13(8):1-25. PubMed ID: 10171865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. HCFA regulations will identify substandard care.
    Robinson ML
    Hospitals; 1988 Nov; 62(21):28. PubMed ID: 3053394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Physicians and the PROs' third scope of work.
    Gosfield AG
    Med Staff Couns; 1989; 3(4):1-10. PubMed ID: 10303854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Physician payment 2008 for interventionalists: current state of health care policy.
    Manchikanti L; Giordano J
    Pain Physician; 2007 Sep; 10(5):607-26. PubMed ID: 17876359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Watchdog on a short chain. How good are PPS's quality-of-care reviewers?
    Kotelchuck R
    Health PAC Bull; 1987 Jun; 17(3):19-22. PubMed ID: 10301612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The role of the PROs.
    Scala M
    Issue Brief Cent Medicare Educ; 2001; 2(2):1-8. PubMed ID: 11859894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Coding basics for orthopaedic surgeons.
    Filler BC
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Apr; 457():105-13. PubMed ID: 17259901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Medicare program; utilization and quality control peer review organization (PRO) reconsiderations and appeals--HCFA. Final rule.
    Fed Regist; 1985 Apr; 50(74):15364-74. PubMed ID: 10299992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Liability seen as side effect of substandard-care rules.
    Burda D
    Mod Healthc; 1989 Mar; 19(9):46. PubMed ID: 10303274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. AHQA report highlights shifting role of PROs.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 2000 Dec; 25(12):170-2, 158. PubMed ID: 11188112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Denial of payment for poor quality care. Missouri's PRO explains Medicare's latest requirement.
    Akhter MN; Jaco D
    Mo Med; 1987 Mar; 84(3):137-40. PubMed ID: 3334407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Medicare and Medicaid programs; utilization and quality control peer review organization (PRO): assumption of Medicare review functions and coordination with Medicaid--HCFA. Final rule.
    Fed Regist; 1985 Apr; 50(74):15312-35. PubMed ID: 10299989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Legislative update ... quality of care under the Medicare program.
    Roper WL
    Health Care Financ Rev; 1986; 8(1):87-91. PubMed ID: 10311781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Health care programs: fraud and abuse; revisions to the PRO sanctions process--HHS. Final rule.
    Fed Regist; 1995 Dec; 60(238):63634-45. PubMed ID: 10153804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Medicare and Medicaid programs; utilization and quality control peer review organization (PRO); assumption of responsibilities and Medicare review functions and coordination of Medicaid with peer review organization--HCFA. Proposed rule.
    Fed Regist; 1984 Jul; 49(138):29026-41. PubMed ID: 10299606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Peer review in the 1990s. A look at the Georgia Medical Care Foundation.
    Murphy RA; Williams TW; Ryan CP
    J Med Assoc Ga; 1989 Aug; 78(8):549-51. PubMed ID: 2769101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Whither the PRO? Analysis of the effectiveness of three Medicare peer review organizations in a Florida hospital.
    Fleegler BM; Wolk M; McCarville J
    J Fla Med Assoc; 1995 Mar; 82(3):203-5. PubMed ID: 7738525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.