142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23901898)
1. Kernel-based partial least squares: application to fingerprint-based QSAR with model visualization.
An Y; Sherman W; Dixon SL
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Sep; 53(9):2312-21. PubMed ID: 23901898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Combinatorial QSAR modeling of specificity and subtype selectivity of ligands binding to serotonin receptors 5HT1E and 5HT1F.
Wang XS; Tang H; Golbraikh A; Tropsha A
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 May; 48(5):997-1013. PubMed ID: 18470978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predictive QSAR modeling of HIV reverse transcriptase inhibitor TIBO derivatives.
Mandal AS; Roy K
Eur J Med Chem; 2009 Apr; 44(4):1509-24. PubMed ID: 18760864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Profile-QSAR: a novel meta-QSAR method that combines activities across the kinase family to accurately predict affinity, selectivity, and cellular activity.
Martin E; Mukherjee P; Sullivan D; Jansen J
J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Aug; 51(8):1942-56. PubMed ID: 21667971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparative QSAR study using CoMFA, HQSAR, and FRED/SKEYS paradigms for estrogen receptor binding affinities of structurally diverse compounds.
Waller CL
J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(2):758-65. PubMed ID: 15032558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fuzzy tricentric pharmacophore fingerprints. 2. Application of topological fuzzy pharmacophore triplets in quantitative structure-activity relationships.
Bonachéra F; Horvath D
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Feb; 48(2):409-25. PubMed ID: 18254617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Application of validated QSAR models of D1 dopaminergic antagonists for database mining.
Oloff S; Mailman RB; Tropsha A
J Med Chem; 2005 Nov; 48(23):7322-32. PubMed ID: 16279792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Toward the prediction of class I and II mouse major histocompatibility complex-peptide-binding affinity: in silico bioinformatic step-by-step guide using quantitative structure-activity relationships.
Hattotuwagama CK; Doytchinova IA; Flower DR
Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 409():227-45. PubMed ID: 18450004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In silico binary classification QSAR models based on 4D-fingerprints and MOE descriptors for prediction of hERG blockage.
Su BH; Shen MY; Esposito EX; Hopfinger AJ; Tseng YJ
J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Jul; 50(7):1304-18. PubMed ID: 20565102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development of QSAR models to predict and interpret the biological activity of artemisinin analogues.
Guha R; Jurs PC
J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(4):1440-9. PubMed ID: 15272852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. QSAR models for the human H(+)/peptide symporter, hPEPT1: affinity prediction using alignment-independent descriptors.
Larsen SB; Jørgensen FS; Olsen L
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Jan; 48(1):233-41. PubMed ID: 18092768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Structural findings of phenylindoles as cytotoxic antimitotic agents in human breast cancer cell lines through multiple validated QSAR studies.
Adhikari N; Halder AK; Saha A; Das Saha K; Jha T
Toxicol In Vitro; 2015 Oct; 29(7):1392-404. PubMed ID: 26026499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. TMACC: interpretable correlation descriptors for quantitative structure-activity relationships.
Melville JL; Hirst JD
J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(2):626-34. PubMed ID: 17381177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of methods for modeling quantitative structure-activity relationships.
Sutherland JJ; O'Brien LA; Weaver DF
J Med Chem; 2004 Oct; 47(22):5541-54. PubMed ID: 15481990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Statistical analysis and compound selection of combinatorial libraries for soluble epoxide hydrolase.
Xing L; Goulet R; Johnson K
J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Jul; 51(7):1582-92. PubMed ID: 21615155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. QSAR modeling using chirality descriptors derived from molecular topology.
Golbraikh A; Tropsha A
J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2003; 43(1):144-54. PubMed ID: 12546547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. QSAR with quantum topological molecular similarity indices: toxicity of aromatic aldehydes to Tetrahymena pyriformis.
Kar S; Harding AP; Roy K; Popelier PL
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2010 Jan; 21(1):149-68. PubMed ID: 20373218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling of dopamine D(1) antagonists using comparative molecular field analysis, genetic algorithms-partial least-squares, and K nearest neighbor methods.
Hoffman B; Cho SJ; Zheng W; Wyrick S; Nichols DE; Mailman RB; Tropsha A
J Med Chem; 1999 Aug; 42(17):3217-26. PubMed ID: 10464009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prediction of fungicidal activities of rice blast disease based on least-squares support vector machines and project pursuit regression.
Du H; Wang J; Hu Z; Yao X; Zhang X
J Agric Food Chem; 2008 Nov; 56(22):10785-92. PubMed ID: 18950187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using kernel alignment to select features of molecular descriptors in a QSAR study.
Wong WW; Burkowski FJ
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2011; 8(5):1373-84. PubMed ID: 21339534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
