340 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23902254)
1. Attentional processing of multiple targets and distractors.
Munneke J; Fait E; Mazza V
Psychophysiology; 2013 Nov; 50(11):1104-8. PubMed ID: 23902254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On the electrophysiological evidence for the capture of visual attention.
McDonald JJ; Green JJ; Jannati A; Di Lollo V
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Jun; 39(3):849-60. PubMed ID: 23163789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Tracking target and distractor processing in fixed-feature visual search: evidence from human electrophysiology.
Jannati A; Gaspar JM; McDonald JJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Dec; 39(6):1713-30. PubMed ID: 23527999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Attentional capture during visual search is attenuated by target predictability: evidence from the N2pc, Pd, and topographic segmentation.
Burra N; Kerzel D
Psychophysiology; 2013 May; 50(5):422-30. PubMed ID: 23418888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Rewarded visual items capture attention only in heterogeneous contexts.
Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Brandhofer R; Schubö A
Psychophysiology; 2016 Jul; 53(7):1063-73. PubMed ID: 26997364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Remembered but unused: the accessory items in working memory that do not guide attention.
Peters JC; Goebel R; Roelfsema PR
J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 21(6):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18702589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Target resolution in visual search involves the direct suppression of distractors: evidence from electrophysiology.
Hilimire MR; Hickey C; Corballis PM
Psychophysiology; 2012 Apr; 49(4):504-9. PubMed ID: 22176697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Electrophysiological indices of target and distractor processing in visual search.
Hickey C; Di Lollo V; McDonald JJ
J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):760-75. PubMed ID: 18564048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Brain dynamics of attention and working memory engagement in subitizing.
Pagano S; Lombardi L; Mazza V
Brain Res; 2014 Jan; 1543():244-52. PubMed ID: 24309139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dynamics of target and distractor processing in visual search: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
Hilimire MR; Mounts JR; Parks NA; Corballis PM
Neurosci Lett; 2011 May; 495(3):196-200. PubMed ID: 21457759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Capture by Context Elements, Not Attentional Suppression of Distractors, Explains the P
Kerzel D; Burra N
J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Jun; 32(6):1170-1183. PubMed ID: 31967520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predicting N2pc from anticipatory HbO activity during sustained visuospatial attention: a concurrent fNIRS-ERP study.
Huang J; Wang F; Ding Y; Niu H; Tian F; Liu H; Song Y
Neuroimage; 2015 Jun; 113():225-34. PubMed ID: 25818691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The attentional blink freezes spatial attention allocation to targets, not distractors: evidence from human electrophysiology.
Pomerleau VJ; Fortier-Gauthier U; Corriveau I; McDonald JJ; Dell'Acqua R; Jolicœur P
Brain Res; 2014 Apr; 1559():33-45. PubMed ID: 24607298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Qualitative differences in the guidance of attention during single-color and multiple-color visual search: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
Grubert A; Eimer M
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Oct; 39(5):1433-42. PubMed ID: 23244044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rapid guidance of visual search by object categories.
Nako R; Wu R; Eimer M
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Feb; 40(1):50-60. PubMed ID: 23796065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Spatially Guided Distractor Suppression during Visual Search.
Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Weinberger M; Awh E
J Neurosci; 2021 Apr; 41(14):3180-3191. PubMed ID: 33653697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dynamics of Feature-based Attentional Selection during Color-Shape Conjunction Search.
Lee J; Leonard CJ; Luck SJ; Geng JJ
J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Dec; 30(12):1773-1787. PubMed ID: 30063176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Context homogeneity facilitates both distractor inhibition and target enhancement.
Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Schubö A
J Vis; 2013 May; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 23650629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of task set-modulating attentional capture depends on the distractor cost in visual search: evidence from N2pc.
Zhao D; Liang S; Jin Z; Li L
Neuroreport; 2014 Jul; 25(10):737-42. PubMed ID: 24840929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Difficulty of discrimination modulates attentional capture by regulating attentional focus.
Sawaki R; Katayama J
J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Feb; 21(2):359-71. PubMed ID: 18510441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
