These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23902310)

  • 1. Does female feeding motivation affect the response to a food-mimicking male ornament in the swordtail characin Corynopoma riisei?
    Amcoff M; Kolm N
    J Fish Biol; 2013 Aug; 83(2):343-54. PubMed ID: 23902310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diversification of a food-mimicking male ornament via sensory drive.
    Kolm N; Amcoff M; Mann RP; Arnqvist G
    Curr Biol; 2012 Aug; 22(15):1440-3. PubMed ID: 22795697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Population differentiation in the swordtail characin (Corynopoma riisei ): a role for sensory drive?
    Arnqvist G; Kolm N
    J Evol Biol; 2010 Sep; 23(9):1907-18. PubMed ID: 20695971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Shared preferences by predators and females for male ornaments in swordtails.
    Rosenthal GG; Flores Martinez TY; García de León FJ; Ryan MJ
    Am Nat; 2001 Aug; 158(2):146-54. PubMed ID: 18707343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Eco-morphological attributes and feeding habits in coexisting characins.
    Portella T; Lobón-Cerviá J; Manna LR; Bergallo HG; Mazzoni R
    J Fish Biol; 2017 Jan; 90(1):129-146. PubMed ID: 27730634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Grazing behaviour of a non-herbivorous characin: revisiting plasticity.
    Marques PS; Costa MF; Corrêa CC; Marinho MM; Mazzoni R
    J Fish Biol; 2014 Aug; 85(2):488-93. PubMed ID: 24921946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence that sensory traps can evolve into honest signals.
    Garcia CM; Ramirez E
    Nature; 2005 Mar; 434(7032):501-5. PubMed ID: 15791255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sexual signals and mating patterns in Syngnathidae.
    Rosenqvist G; Berglund A
    J Fish Biol; 2011 Jun; 78(6):1647-61. PubMed ID: 21651521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The evolution of female mating preferences: differentiation from species with promiscuous males can promote speciation.
    McPeek MA; Gavrilets S
    Evolution; 2006 Oct; 60(10):1967-80. PubMed ID: 17133854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Female swallow preference for symmetrical male sexual ornaments.
    Møller AP
    Nature; 1992 May; 357(6375):238-40. PubMed ID: 1589021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The mate choice brain: comparing gene profiles between female choice and male coercive poeciliids.
    Lynch KS; Ramsey ME; Cummings ME
    Genes Brain Behav; 2012 Mar; 11(2):222-9. PubMed ID: 22008245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sexual incentive motivation, olfactory preference, and activation of the vomeronasal projection pathway by sexually relevant cues in non-copulating and naive male rats.
    Portillo W; Paredes RG
    Horm Behav; 2004 Sep; 46(3):330-40. PubMed ID: 15325233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. No fecundity cost of female secondary sexual trait expression in the horned beetle Onthophagus sagittarius.
    Simmons LW; Emlen DJ
    J Evol Biol; 2008 Sep; 21(5):1227-35. PubMed ID: 18631210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sex differences in mate recognition and conspecific preference in species with mutual mate choice.
    Kozak GM; Reisland M; Boughmann JW
    Evolution; 2009 Feb; 63(2):353-65. PubMed ID: 19154359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can non-directional male mating preferences facilitate honest female ornamentation?
    Chenoweth SF; Doughty P; Kokko H
    Ecol Lett; 2006 Feb; 9(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 16958883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Situation exploitation: higher male mating success when female resistance is reduced by feeding.
    Reinhardt K; Naylor RA; Siva-Jothy MT
    Evolution; 2009 Jan; 63(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 18752607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do male house mice (Mus musculus) discriminate between females that differ in nutritional status?
    Costello AK; Pultorak JD; Meikle DB
    Behav Processes; 2009 Oct; 82(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 19467300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pterin-based ornamental coloration predicts yolk antioxidant levels in female striped plateau lizards (Sceloporus virgatus).
    Weiss SL; Kennedy EA; Safran RJ; McGraw KJ
    J Anim Ecol; 2011 May; 80(3):519-27. PubMed ID: 21269301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Handicap principle implies emergence of dimorphic ornaments.
    Clifton SM; Braun RI; Abrams DM
    Proc Biol Sci; 2016 Nov; 283(1843):. PubMed ID: 27903876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Indirect mate choice, direct mate choice and species recognition in a bower-building cichlid fish lek.
    Genner MJ; Young KA; Haesler MP; Joyce DA
    J Evol Biol; 2008 Sep; 21(5):1387-96. PubMed ID: 18547351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.