BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23902427)

  • 1. Efficiency of genomic selection in an established commercial layer breeding program.
    Sitzenstock F; Ytournel F; Sharifi AR; Cavero D; Täubert H; Preisinger R; Simianer H
    Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Jul; 45(1):29. PubMed ID: 23902427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Economic evaluation of genomic selection in small ruminants: a sheep meat breeding program.
    Shumbusho F; Raoul J; Astruc JM; Palhiere I; Lemarié S; Fugeray-Scarbel A; Elsen JM
    Animal; 2016 Jun; 10(6):1033-41. PubMed ID: 26446712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Economic evaluation of genomic breeding programs.
    König S; Simianer H; Willam A
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Jan; 92(1):382-91. PubMed ID: 19109296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Economic aspects of implementing genomic evaluations in a pig sire line breeding scheme.
    Tribout T; Larzul C; Phocas F
    Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Oct; 45(1):40. PubMed ID: 24127883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Total cost estimation for implementing genome-enabled selection in a multi-level swine production system.
    Abell CE; Dekkers JC; Rothschild MF; Mabry JW; Stalder KJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 May; 46(1):32. PubMed ID: 24885089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genomic selection strategies in a small dairy cattle population evaluated for genetic gain and profit.
    Thomasen JR; Egger-Danner C; Willam A; Guldbrandtsen B; Lund MS; Sørensen AC
    J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(1):458-70. PubMed ID: 24239076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genomic selection for the improvement of meat quality in beef.
    Pimentel EC; König S
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Oct; 90(10):3418-26. PubMed ID: 22665643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genomic selection in dairy cattle simulated populations.
    Seno LO; Guidolin DGF; Aspilcueta-Borquis RR; Nascimento GBD; Silva TBRD; Oliveira HN; Munari DP
    J Dairy Res; 2018 May; 85(2):125-132. PubMed ID: 29785919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Application of selection index calculations to determine selection strategies in genomic breeding programs.
    König S; Swalve HH
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Oct; 92(10):5292-303. PubMed ID: 19762847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimization of Swine Breeding Programs Using Genomic Selection with ZPLAN.
    Lopez BM; Kang HS; Kim TH; Viterbo VS; Kim HS; Na CS; Seo KS
    Asian-Australas J Anim Sci; 2016 May; 29(5):640-5. PubMed ID: 26954222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimal strategies for the use of genomic selection in dairy cattle breeding programs.
    Wensch-Dorendorf M; Yin T; Swalve HH; König S
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Aug; 94(8):4140-51. PubMed ID: 21787949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predicted accuracy of and response to genomic selection for new traits in dairy cattle.
    Calus MP; de Haas Y; Pszczola M; Veerkamp RF
    Animal; 2013 Feb; 7(2):183-91. PubMed ID: 23031684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of the genomic prediction accuracy for feed efficiency traits in meat-type chickens.
    Liu T; Luo C; Wang J; Ma J; Shu D; Lund MS; Su G; Qu H
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0173620. PubMed ID: 28278209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genomic selection using low density marker panels with application to a sire line in pigs.
    Wellmann R; Preuß S; Tholen E; Heinkel J; Wimmers K; Bennewitz J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Jul; 45(1):28. PubMed ID: 23895218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of genomic selection on genetic improvement, inbreeding, and merit of young versus proven bulls.
    de Roos AP; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF; van Arendonk JA
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Mar; 94(3):1559-67. PubMed ID: 21338821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Design of reference populations for genomic selection in crossbreeding programs.
    van Grevenhof IE; van der Werf JH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Mar; 47(1):14. PubMed ID: 25887562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficiency of different selection strategies against boar taint in pigs.
    Haberland AM; Luther H; Hofer A; Tholen E; Simianer H; Lind B; Baes C
    Animal; 2014 Jan; 8(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 24176119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Potential benefits of genomic selection on genetic gain of small ruminant breeding programs.
    Shumbusho F; Raoul J; Astruc JM; Palhiere I; Elsen JM
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Aug; 91(8):3644-57. PubMed ID: 23736059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Response and inbreeding from a genomic selection experiment in layer chickens.
    Wolc A; Zhao HH; Arango J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Preisinger R; Stricker C; Habier D; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ; Lamont SJ; Dekkers JC
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Jul; 47(1):59. PubMed ID: 26149977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Benefits of testing in both bio-secure and production environments in genomic selection breeding programs for commercial broiler chicken.
    Chu TT; Alemu SW; Norberg E; Sørensen AC; Henshall J; Hawken R; Jensen J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Nov; 50(1):52. PubMed ID: 30390619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.