These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23902427)

  • 21. Genotype Imputation To Improve the Cost-Efficiency of Genomic Selection in Farmed Atlantic Salmon.
    Tsai HY; Matika O; Edwards SM; Antolín-Sánchez R; Hamilton A; Guy DR; Tinch AE; Gharbi K; Stear MJ; Taggart JB; Bron JE; Hickey JM; Houston RD
    G3 (Bethesda); 2017 Apr; 7(4):1377-1383. PubMed ID: 28250015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of number of training generations on genomic prediction for various traits in a layer chicken population.
    Weng Z; Wolc A; Shen X; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC; Arango J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Mar; 48():22. PubMed ID: 26992471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Genomic prediction of survival time in a population of brown laying hens showing cannibalistic behavior.
    Alemu SW; Calus MP; Muir WM; Peeters K; Vereijken A; Bijma P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Sep; 48(1):68. PubMed ID: 27623765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Genomic prediction based on data from three layer lines: a comparison between linear methods.
    Calus MP; Huang H; Vereijken A; Visscher J; Ten Napel J; Windig JJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Oct; 46(1):57. PubMed ID: 25927219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Whole-genome sequence-based genomic prediction in laying chickens with different genomic relationship matrices to account for genetic architecture.
    Ni G; Cavero D; Fangmann A; Erbe M; Simianer H
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jan; 49(1):8. PubMed ID: 28093063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. On the value of the phenotypes in the genomic era.
    Gonzalez-Recio O; Coffey MP; Pryce JE
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Dec; 97(12):7905-15. PubMed ID: 25453600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Reliability of genomic evaluation for egg quality traits in layers.
    Picard Druet D; Varenne A; Herry F; Hérault F; Allais S; Burlot T; Le Roy P
    BMC Genet; 2020 Feb; 21(1):17. PubMed ID: 32046634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The impact of selective genotyping on the response to selection using single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction.
    Howard JT; Rathje TA; Bruns CE; Wilson-Wells DF; Kachman SD; Spangler ML
    J Anim Sci; 2018 Nov; 96(11):4532-4542. PubMed ID: 30107560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Interplay between heritability, genetic correlation and economic weighting in a selection index with and without genomic information.
    Haberland AM; Pimentel EC; Ytournel F; Erbe M; Simianer H
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2013 Dec; 130(6):456-67. PubMed ID: 24236608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Genetic and economic evaluation of Japanese Black (Wagyu) cattle breeding schemes.
    Kahi AK; Hirooka H
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Sep; 83(9):2021-32. PubMed ID: 16100056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Genetic and economic benefits of selection based on performance recording and genotyping in lower tiers of multi-tiered sheep breeding schemes.
    Santos BF; van der Werf JH; Gibson JP; Byrne TJ; Amer PR
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jan; 49(1):10. PubMed ID: 28095776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Most of the benefits from genomic selection can be realized by genotyping a small proportion of available selection candidates.
    Henryon M; Berg P; Ostersen T; Nielsen B; Sørensen AC
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(13):4681-9. PubMed ID: 23087087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of enlarging the reference population with (un)genotyped animals on the accuracy of genomic selection in dairy cattle.
    Pszczola M; Mulder HA; Calus MP
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Jan; 94(1):431-41. PubMed ID: 21183054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Accuracy of estimated breeding values with genomic information on males, females, or both: an example on broiler chicken.
    Lourenco DA; Fragomeni BO; Tsuruta S; Aguilar I; Zumbach B; Hawken RJ; Legarra A; Misztal I
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Jul; 47(1):56. PubMed ID: 26133806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of Different Strategies for Exploiting Genomic Selection in Perennial Ryegrass Breeding Programs.
    Esfandyari H; Fè D; Tessema BB; Janss LL; Jensen J
    G3 (Bethesda); 2020 Oct; 10(10):3783-3795. PubMed ID: 32819970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Economic evaluation of progeny-testing and genomic selection schemes for small-sized nucleus dairy cattle breeding programs in developing countries.
    Kariuki CM; Brascamp EW; Komen H; Kahi AK; van Arendonk JAM
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Mar; 100(3):2258-2268. PubMed ID: 28109609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Investigating the impact of preselection on subsequent single-step genomic BLUP evaluation of preselected animals.
    Jibrila I; Ten Napel J; Vandenplas J; Veerkamp RF; Calus MPL
    Genet Sel Evol; 2020 Jul; 52(1):42. PubMed ID: 32727349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Genomic Selection for Any Dairy Breeding Program via Optimized Investment in Phenotyping and Genotyping.
    Obšteter J; Jenko J; Gorjanc G
    Front Genet; 2021; 12():637017. PubMed ID: 33679899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Genomic selection in a pig population including information from slaughtered full sibs of boars within a sib-testing program.
    Samorè AB; Buttazzoni L; Gallo M; Russo V; Fontanesi L
    Animal; 2015 May; 9(5):750-9. PubMed ID: 25510405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Genomic selection for non-key traits in radiata pine when the documented pedigree is corrected using DNA marker information.
    Li Y; Klápště J; Telfer E; Wilcox P; Graham N; Macdonald L; Dungey HS
    BMC Genomics; 2019 Dec; 20(1):1026. PubMed ID: 31881838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.