These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23902427)

  • 41. Assessment of the genetic and economic impact of performance recording and genotyping in Australian commercial sheep operations.
    Santos BFS; Amer PR; Granleese T; Byrne TJ; Hogan L; Gibson JP; van der Werf JHJ
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2018 Jun; 135(3):221-237. PubMed ID: 29878494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Can breeders solve mortality due to feather pecking in laying hens?
    Ellen ED; Bijma P
    Poult Sci; 2019 Sep; 98(9):3431-3442. PubMed ID: 31065706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Genomic selection for productive traits in biparental cassava breeding populations.
    Torres LG; Vilela de Resende MD; Azevedo CF; Fonseca E Silva F; de Oliveira EJ
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0220245. PubMed ID: 31344109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The potential of embryo transfer in a German horse-breeding programme.
    Sitzenstock F; Rathke I; Ytournel F; Simianer H
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2013 Jun; 130(3):199-208. PubMed ID: 23679945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Prediction of the reliability of genomic breeding values for crossbred performance.
    Vandenplas J; Windig JJ; Calus MPL
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 May; 49(1):43. PubMed ID: 28499351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges.
    Hayes BJ; Bowman PJ; Chamberlain AJ; Goddard ME
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Feb; 92(2):433-43. PubMed ID: 19164653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Genotype Imputation to Improve the Cost-Efficiency of Genomic Selection in Rabbits.
    Mancin E; Sosa-Madrid BS; Blasco A; Ibáñez-Escriche N
    Animals (Basel); 2021 Mar; 11(3):. PubMed ID: 33805619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Genomic selection strategies to increase genetic gain in tea breeding programs.
    Lubanga N; Massawe F; Mayes S; Gorjanc G; Bančič J
    Plant Genome; 2023 Mar; 16(1):e20282. PubMed ID: 36349831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Genomic predictions can accelerate selection for resistance against Piscirickettsia salmonis in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar).
    Bangera R; Correa K; Lhorente JP; Figueroa R; Yáñez JM
    BMC Genomics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):121. PubMed ID: 28143402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Genomic selection improves the possibility of applying multiple breeding programs in different environments.
    Slagboom M; Kargo M; Sørensen AC; Thomasen JR; Mulder HA
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Sep; 102(9):8197-8209. PubMed ID: 31326182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Integration of genomic information into sport horse breeding programs for optimization of accuracy of selection.
    Haberland AM; König von Borstel U; Simianer H; König S
    Animal; 2012 Sep; 6(9):1369-76. PubMed ID: 23031511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Evaluation of genomic selection for replacement strategies using selection index theory.
    Calus MP; Bijma P; Veerkamp RF
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Sep; 98(9):6499-509. PubMed ID: 26142859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Optimized grouping to increase accuracy of prediction of breeding values based on group records in genomic selection breeding programs.
    Chu TT; Bastiaansen JWM; Berg P; Komen H
    Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Nov; 51(1):64. PubMed ID: 31730478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Expected benefit of genomic selection over forward selection in conifer breeding and deployment.
    Li Y; Dungey HS
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0208232. PubMed ID: 30532178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Practical implementation of cost-effective genomic selection in commercial pig breeding using imputation.
    Cleveland MA; Hickey JM
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Aug; 91(8):3583-92. PubMed ID: 23736050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Potential of gene drives with genome editing to increase genetic gain in livestock breeding programs.
    Gonen S; Jenko J; Gorjanc G; Mileham AJ; Whitelaw CB; Hickey JM
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jan; 49(1):3. PubMed ID: 28093068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Persistence of accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values over generations in layer chickens.
    Wolc A; Arango J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Preisinger R; Habier D; Fernando R; Garrick DJ; Dekkers JC
    Genet Sel Evol; 2011 Jun; 43(1):23. PubMed ID: 21693035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Accuracy of direct genomic breeding values for nationally evaluated traits in US Limousin and Simmental beef cattle.
    Saatchi M; Schnabel RD; Rolf MM; Taylor JF; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Dec; 44(1):38. PubMed ID: 23216608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Empirical and deterministic accuracies of across-population genomic prediction.
    Wientjes YC; Veerkamp RF; Bijma P; Bovenhuis H; Schrooten C; Calus MP
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):5. PubMed ID: 25885467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Use of female information in dairy cattle genomic breeding programs.
    Mc Hugh N; Meuwissen TH; Cromie AR; Sonesson AK
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Aug; 94(8):4109-18. PubMed ID: 21787946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.