These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23902907)

  • 1. Individual personalities shape task differentiation in a social spider.
    Grinsted L; Pruitt JN; Settepani V; Bilde T
    Proc Biol Sci; 2013 Sep; 280(1767):20131407. PubMed ID: 23902907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Task specialization in two social spiders, Stegodyphus sarasinorum (Eresidae) and Anelosimus eximius (Theridiidae).
    Settepani V; Grinsted L; Granfeldt J; Jensen JL; Bilde T
    J Evol Biol; 2013 Jan; 26(1):51-62. PubMed ID: 23163349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Persistent social interactions beget more pronounced personalities in a desert-dwelling social spider.
    Modlmeier AP; Laskowski KL; DeMarco AE; Coleman A; Zhao K; Brittingham HA; McDermott DR; Pruitt JN
    Biol Lett; 2014 Aug; 10(8):. PubMed ID: 25165452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Personality composition is more important than group size in determining collective foraging behaviour in the wild.
    Keiser CN; Pruitt JN
    Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Dec; 281(1796):20141424. PubMed ID: 25320170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Warring arthropod societies: Social spider colonies can delay annihilation by predatory ants via reduced apparency and increased group size.
    Keiser CN; Wright CM; Pruitt JN
    Behav Processes; 2015 Oct; 119():14-21. PubMed ID: 26205161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Social interactions shape individual and collective personality in social spiders.
    Hunt ER; Mi B; Fernandez C; Wong BM; Pruitt JN; Pinter-Wollman N
    Proc Biol Sci; 2018 Sep; 285(1886):. PubMed ID: 30185649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Participation in cooperative prey capture and the benefits gained from it are associated with individual personality.
    Lichtenstein JLL; Wright CM; Luscuskie LP; Montgomery GA; Pinter-Wollman N; Pruitt JN
    Curr Zool; 2017 Oct; 63(5):561-567. PubMed ID: 29033979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The legacy effects of keystone individuals on collective behaviour scale to how long they remain within a group.
    Pruitt JN
    Proc Biol Sci; 2015 Sep; 282(1814):. PubMed ID: 26336171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How within-group behavioural variation and task efficiency enhance fitness in a social group.
    Pruitt JN; Riechert SE
    Proc Biol Sci; 2011 Apr; 278(1709):1209-15. PubMed ID: 20943687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Individual and Group Performance Suffers from Social Niche Disruption.
    Laskowski KL; Montiglio PO; Pruitt JN
    Am Nat; 2016 Jun; 187(6):776-85. PubMed ID: 27172596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evidence of social niche construction: persistent and repeated social interactions generate stronger personalities in a social spider.
    Laskowski KL; Pruitt JN
    Proc Biol Sci; 2014 May; 281(1783):20133166. PubMed ID: 24671972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Resting networks and personality predict attack speed in social spiders.
    Hunt ER; Mi B; Geremew R; Fernandez C; Wong BM; Pruitt JN; Pinter-Wollman N
    Behav Ecol Sociobiol; 2019 Jul; 73(7):. PubMed ID: 32440036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prey to predator body size ratio in the evolution of cooperative hunting-a social spider test case.
    Grinsted L; Schou MF; Settepani V; Holm C; Bird TL; Bilde T
    Dev Genes Evol; 2020 Mar; 230(2):173-184. PubMed ID: 31768622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cooperative capture of large prey solves scaling challenge faced by spider societies.
    Yip EC; Powers KS; Avilés L
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2008 Aug; 105(33):11818-22. PubMed ID: 18689677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differences in group size and the extent of individual participation in group hunting may contribute to differential prey-size use among social spiders.
    Harwood G; Avilés L
    Biol Lett; 2013; 9(6):20130621. PubMed ID: 24284559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The contribution of developmental experience vs. condition to life history, trait variation and individual differences.
    DiRienzo N; Montiglio PO
    J Anim Ecol; 2016 Jul; 85(4):915-26. PubMed ID: 26937627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. David and Goliath: potent venom of an ant-eating spider (Araneae) enables capture of a giant prey.
    Pekár S; Šedo O; Líznarová E; Korenko S; Zdráhal Z
    Naturwissenschaften; 2014 Jul; 101(7):533-40. PubMed ID: 24879352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prey size and scramble vs. contest competition in a social spider: implications for population dynamics.
    Sharpe RV; Avilés L
    J Anim Ecol; 2016 Sep; 85(5):1401-10. PubMed ID: 27300160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of within-colony competition on body size asymmetries and reproductive skew in a social spider.
    Grinsted L; Bilde T
    J Evol Biol; 2013 Mar; 26(3):553-61. PubMed ID: 23286336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cooperative foraging expands dietary niche but does not offset intra-group competition for resources in social spiders.
    Majer M; Holm C; Lubin Y; Bilde T
    Sci Rep; 2018 Aug; 8(1):11828. PubMed ID: 30087391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.