169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23903995)
1. Benefits of contrast-enhanced SWI in patients with glioblastoma multiforme.
Fahrendorf D; Schwindt W; Wölfer J; Jeibmann A; Kooijman H; Kugel H; Grauer O; Heindel W; Hesselmann V; Bink A
Eur Radiol; 2013 Oct; 23(10):2868-79. PubMed ID: 23903995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Variations of ITSS-Morphology and their Relationship to Location and Tumor Volume in Patients with Glioblastoma.
Fahrendorf D; Hesselmann V; Schwindt W; Wölfer J; Jeibmann A; Kooijman H; Kugel H; Heindel W; Bink A
J Neuroimaging; 2015; 25(6):1015-22. PubMed ID: 25703027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging of Glioma: Update on Current Imaging Status and Future Directions.
Hsu CC; Watkins TW; Kwan GN; Haacke EM
J Neuroimaging; 2016 Jul; 26(4):383-90. PubMed ID: 27227542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Semiquantitative assessment of intratumoral susceptibility signals using non-contrast-enhanced high-field high-resolution susceptibility-weighted imaging in patients with gliomas: comparison with MR perfusion imaging.
Park MJ; Kim HS; Jahng GH; Ryu CW; Park SM; Kim SY
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2009 Aug; 30(7):1402-8. PubMed ID: 19369602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Non-invasive assessment of intratumoral vascularity using arterial spin labeling: A comparison to susceptibility-weighted imaging for the differentiation of primary cerebral lymphoma and glioblastoma.
Furtner J; Schöpf V; Preusser M; Asenbaum U; Woitek R; Wöhrer A; Hainfellner JA; Wolfsberger S; Prayer D
Eur J Radiol; 2014 May; 83(5):806-10. PubMed ID: 24613549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Contrast medium enhanced susceptibility imaging signal mechanism; should we use contrast medium?
Aydın Ö; Büyükkaya R; Hakyemez B
Acta Radiol; 2017 Jan; 58(1):107-113. PubMed ID: 26966145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Primary central nervous system lymphoma and atypical glioblastoma: multiparametric differentiation by using diffusion-, perfusion-, and susceptibility-weighted MR imaging.
Kickingereder P; Wiestler B; Sahm F; Heiland S; Roethke M; Schlemmer HP; Wick W; Bendszus M; Radbruch A
Radiology; 2014 Sep; 272(3):843-50. PubMed ID: 24814181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differentiation of glioblastoma and primary CNS lymphomas using susceptibility weighted imaging.
Radbruch A; Wiestler B; Kramp L; Lutz K; Bäumer P; Weiler M; Roethke M; Sahm F; Schlemmer HP; Wick W; Heiland S; Bendszus M
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Mar; 82(3):552-6. PubMed ID: 23238364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Local image variance of 7 Tesla SWI is a new technique for preoperative characterization of diffusely infiltrating gliomas: correlation with tumour grade and IDH1 mutational status.
Grabner G; Kiesel B; Wöhrer A; Millesi M; Wurzer A; Göd S; Mallouhi A; Knosp E; Marosi C; Trattnig S; Wolfsberger S; Preusser M; Widhalm G
Eur Radiol; 2017 Apr; 27(4):1556-1567. PubMed ID: 27300198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multiparametric imaging-based differentiation of lymphoma and glioblastoma: using T1-perfusion, diffusion, and susceptibility-weighted MRI.
Saini J; Kumar Gupta P; Awasthi A; Pandey CM; Singh A; Patir R; Ahlawat S; Sadashiva N; Mahadevan A; Kumar Gupta R
Clin Radiol; 2018 Nov; 73(11):986.e7-986.e15. PubMed ID: 30197047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Glioblastomas vs. lymphomas: more diagnostic certainty by using susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI).
Peters S; Knöß N; Wodarg F; Cnyrim C; Jansen O
Rofo; 2012 Aug; 184(8):713-8. PubMed ID: 22618484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Glioma grading by microvascular permeability parameters derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and intratumoral susceptibility signal on susceptibility weighted imaging.
Li X; Zhu Y; Kang H; Zhang Y; Liang H; Wang S; Zhang W
Cancer Imaging; 2015 Mar; 15(1):4. PubMed ID: 25889239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intergrating conventional MRI, texture analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, and susceptibility weighted imaging for glioma grading.
Su CQ; Lu SS; Han QY; Zhou MD; Hong XN
Acta Radiol; 2019 Jun; 60(6):777-787. PubMed ID: 30244590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differentiation of grade II/III and grade IV glioma by combining "T1 contrast-enhanced brain perfusion imaging" and susceptibility-weighted quantitative imaging.
Saini J; Gupta PK; Sahoo P; Singh A; Patir R; Ahlawat S; Beniwal M; Thennarasu K; Santosh V; Gupta RK
Neuroradiology; 2018 Jan; 60(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 29090331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Glioblastoma multiforme versus solitary supratentorial brain metastasis: differentiation based on morphology and magnetic resonance signal characteristics.
Maurer MH; Synowitz M; Badakshi H; Lohkamp LN; Wüstefeld J; Schäfer ML; Wiener E
Rofo; 2013 Mar; 185(3):235-40. PubMed ID: 23196836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multi-parametric effect in predicting tumor histological grade by using susceptibility weighted magnetic resonance imaging in tongue squamous cell carcinoma.
Yang X; Zhu J; Dai Y; Tian Z; Yang G; Shi H; Wu Y; Tao X
BMC Med Imaging; 2019 Mar; 19(1):24. PubMed ID: 30866854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Which combination of MR imaging modalities is best for predicting recurrent glioblastoma? Study of diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility.
Kim HS; Goh MJ; Kim N; Choi CG; Kim SJ; Kim JH
Radiology; 2014 Dec; 273(3):831-43. PubMed ID: 24885857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multilayer appearance on contrast-enhanced susceptibility-weighted images on patients with brain abscesses: Possible origins and effects of postprocessing.
Chang HC; Chuang TC; Chung HW; Lin HS; Lai PH; Weng MJ; Fu JH; Wang PC; Li SC; Pan HB
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Dec; 36(6):1353-61. PubMed ID: 23097197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of DSC-MRI post-processing techniques in predicting microvascular histopathology in patients newly diagnosed with GBM.
Essock-Burns E; Phillips JJ; Molinaro AM; Lupo JM; Cha S; Chang SM; Nelson SJ
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Aug; 38(2):388-400. PubMed ID: 23281184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of glioblastoma heterogeneity on survival stratification: a multimodal MR imaging texture analysis.
Liu Y; Zhang X; Feng N; Yin L; He Y; Xu X; Lu H
Acta Radiol; 2018 Oct; 59(10):1239-1246. PubMed ID: 29430935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
