These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23905097)

  • 21. Evaluation of grading and hormone receptor immunostaining on fine needle aspirates in carcinoma breast.
    Handa U; Kumar A; Kundu R; Dalal U; Mohan H
    J Cytol; 2015; 32(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 25948935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Prognostic value of cytological grading of fine-needle aspirates from breast carcinomas.
    Robinson IA; McKee G; Nicholson A; D'Arcy J; Jackson PA; Cook MG; Kissin MW
    Lancet; 1994 Apr; 343(8903):947-9. PubMed ID: 7909010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cytological grading of breast carcinoma on fine needle aspirates and its relation with histological grading.
    Phukan JP; Sinha A; Deka JP
    South Asian J Cancer; 2015; 4(1):32-4. PubMed ID: 25839018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Validity of different cytological grading systems of breast carcinoma--a hospital-based study in South India.
    Rekha TS; Nandini NM; Dhar M
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(11):3013-6. PubMed ID: 22393982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cytological grading of breast cancers and comparative evaluation of two grading systems.
    Wani FA; Bhardwaj S; Kumar D; Katoch P
    J Cytol; 2010 Apr; 27(2):55-8. PubMed ID: 21157550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Significance of nuclear morphometry in cytological aspirates of breast masses.
    Kalhan S; Dubey S; Sharma S; Dudani S; Preeti ; Dixit M
    J Cytol; 2010 Jan; 27(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 21042529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparative evaluation of six parametric Robinson and three parametric Howell's modification of Scarf-BloomRichardson grading method on breast aspirates with histopathology: A prospective study.
    Walke VA; Gunjkar G
    Cytojournal; 2017; 14():31. PubMed ID: 29333191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cytological Grading of Breast Tumors-The Human and Canine Perspective.
    Kuppusamy K; Rajan A; Warrier A; Nadhan R; Patra D; Srinivas P
    Front Vet Sci; 2019; 6():283. PubMed ID: 31508437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Typing and grading of cytological category C5 breast lesions.
    Zafar N; Jamal S; Mamoon N; Luqman M; Anwar M
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2005 Apr; 15(4):221-4. PubMed ID: 15857595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Introduction of the cytological grading, the nuclear area, the DNA index and the DNA histogram type in the setting up of a score for ductal breast carcinoma.
    Budel V; Merle S; Gasperin P; Collet JF; De Maublanc MA; Kiss R
    Anticancer Res; 1994; 14(6B):2845-51. PubMed ID: 7532932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Role of cytologic grading in prognostication of invasive breast carcinoma.
    Khan N; Afroz N; Rana F; Khan M
    J Cytol; 2009 Apr; 26(2):65-8. PubMed ID: 21938155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Diagnostic value of fine needle aspirates processed by ThinPrep® for the assessment of axillary lymph node status in patients with invasive carcinoma of the breast.
    Jing X; Wey E; Michael CW
    Cytopathology; 2013 Dec; 24(6):372-6. PubMed ID: 23020285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Grading systems in the cytological diagnosis of breast cancer: a review.
    Bansal C; Pujani M; Sharma KL; Srivastava AN; Singh US
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2014; 10(4):839-45. PubMed ID: 25579516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cytologic evaluation of prognostic markers in breast carcinoma.
    Jayaram G; Elsayed EM
    Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(6):605-10. PubMed ID: 16450899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cytohistomorphological grading of breast carcinoma with special reference to apoptotic rates and lymph node metastasis.
    Khan N; Rana F; Afroz N; Khan MA
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2007 Jul; 50(3):613-8. PubMed ID: 17883162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparative evaluation of the modified Scarff-Bloom-Richardson grading system on breast carcinoma aspirates and histopathology.
    Bansal C; Singh US; Misra S; Sharma KL; Tiwari V; Srivastava AN
    Cytojournal; 2012; 9():4. PubMed ID: 22363393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cytohistological correlation of grading in breast carcinoma.
    Lingegowda JB; MuddeGowda PH; Ramakantha CK; Chandrasekar HR
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2011 Apr; 39(4):251-7. PubMed ID: 21416638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cytopathological grading, as a predictor of histopathological grade, in ductal carcinoma (NOS) of breast, on air-dried Diff-Quik smears.
    Khan MZ; Haleem A; Al Hassani H; Kfoury H
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Oct; 29(4):185-93. PubMed ID: 14506669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Diagnosis and grading of non-Hodgkin's lymphomas on fine needle aspiration cytology.
    Mathur S; Dawar R; Verma K
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2007 Jan; 50(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 17474258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cytological grading of breast neoplasia and its correlation with histological grading.
    Ohri A; Jetly D; Shukla K; Bansal R
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2006 Apr; 49(2):208-13. PubMed ID: 16933716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.