These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23906385)

  • 21. Protecting threatened identity: sticking with the group by emphasizing ingroup heterogeneity.
    Hutchison P; Jetten J; Christian J; Haycraft E
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2006 Dec; 32(12):1620-32. PubMed ID: 17122175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A double standard when group members behave badly: transgression credit to ingroup leaders.
    Abrams D; Randsley de Moura G; Travaglino GA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Nov; 105(5):799-815. PubMed ID: 23895265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Our flaws are more human than yours: ingroup bias in humanizing negative characteristics.
    Koval P; Laham SM; Haslam N; Bastian B; Whelan JA
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2012 Mar; 38(3):283-95. PubMed ID: 21940854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Humanizing Outgroups Through Multiple Categorization: The Roles of Individuation and Threat.
    Prati F; Crisp RJ; Meleady R; Rubini M
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2016 Apr; 42(4):526-39. PubMed ID: 26984016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Paradoxical effects of praise and criticism: social, dimensional and temporal comparisons.
    Möller J
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2005 Jun; 75(Pt 2):275-95. PubMed ID: 16033667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Perceived entitativity and the black-sheep effect: when will we denigrate negative ingroup members?
    Lewis AC; Sherman SJ
    J Soc Psychol; 2010; 150(2):211-25. PubMed ID: 20397595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. We feel, therefore we are: emotion as a basis for self-categorization and social action.
    Livingstone AG; Spears R; Manstead AS; Bruder M; Shepherd L
    Emotion; 2011 Aug; 11(4):754-67. PubMed ID: 21728416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Perceiving your group's future to be in jeopardy: extinction threat induces collective angst and the desire to strengthen the ingroup.
    Wohl MJ; Branscombe NR; Reysen S
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2010 Jul; 36(7):898-910. PubMed ID: 20519571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The stereotype consistency effect is moderated by group membership and trait valence.
    Jackson JW; Rose J
    J Soc Psychol; 2013; 153(1):51-61. PubMed ID: 23421005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Social identity in adolescence.
    Tarrant M; North AC; Edridge MD; Kirk LE; Smith EA; Turner RE
    J Adolesc; 2001 Oct; 24(5):597-609. PubMed ID: 11676507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Social categorization and empathy for outgroup members.
    Tarrant M; Dazeley S; Cottom T
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2009 Sep; 48(Pt 3):427-46. PubMed ID: 19000358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Like me or like us: is ingroup projection just social projection?
    Bianchi M; Machunsky M; Steffens MC; Mummendey A
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(3):198-205. PubMed ID: 19289362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Responses to endorsement of commonality by ingroup and outgroup members: the roles of group representation and threat.
    Gómez Á; Dovidio JF; Gaertner SL; Fernández S; Vázquez A
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2013 Apr; 39(4):419-31. PubMed ID: 23456560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Criticism or praise? The impact of verbal versus text-only computer feedback on social presence, intrinsic motivation, and recall.
    Bracken CC; Jeffres LW; Neuendorf KA
    Cyberpsychol Behav; 2004 Jun; 7(3):349-57. PubMed ID: 15257835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Shooting the messenger: outsiders critical of your group are rejected regardless of argument quality.
    Esposo SR; Hornsey MJ; Spoor JR
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2013 Jun; 52(2):386-95. PubMed ID: 23316747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The other side of we: when outgroup members express common identity.
    Gómez A; Dovidio JF; Huici C; Gaertner SL; Cuadrado I
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Dec; 34(12):1613-26. PubMed ID: 18832337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Intergroup threat and experienced affect: the distinct roles of causal attributions, ingroup identification, and perceived legitimacy of intergroup status.
    Costarelli S
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2007 Nov; 33(11):1481-91. PubMed ID: 17636208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The mere presence of an outgroup member disrupts the brain's feedback-monitoring system.
    Hobson NM; Inzlicht M
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2016 Nov; 11(11):1698-1706. PubMed ID: 27330183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Exclusion as self-protection: the function of subtypes for ingroup members.
    Parks-Stamm EJ
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2013 May; 39(5):651-62. PubMed ID: 23471318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Shared identity is key to effective communication.
    Greenaway KH; Wright RG; Willingham J; Reynolds KJ; Haslam SA
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 Feb; 41(2):171-82. PubMed ID: 25416042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.