188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23906418)
1. Interobserver variability in the pathological assessment of radical prostatectomy specimens: findings of the Laparoscopic Prostatectomy Robot Open (LAPPRO) study.
Persson J; Wilderäng U; Jiborn T; Wiklund PN; Damber JE; Hugosson J; Steineck G; Haglind E; Bjartell A
Scand J Urol; 2014 Apr; 48(2):160-7. PubMed ID: 23906418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interobserver variability between expert urologic pathologists for extraprostatic extension and surgical margin status in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Evans AJ; Henry PC; Van der Kwast TH; Tkachuk DC; Watson K; Lockwood GA; Fleshner NE; Cheung C; Belanger EC; Amin MB; Boccon-Gibod L; Bostwick DG; Egevad L; Epstein JI; Grignon DJ; Jones EC; Montironi R; Moussa M; Sweet JM; Trpkov K; Wheeler TM; Srigley JR
Am J Surg Pathol; 2008 Oct; 32(10):1503-12. PubMed ID: 18708939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Discrepancy between local and central pathological review of radical prostatectomy specimens.
Kuroiwa K; Shiraishi T; Ogawa O; Usami M; Hirao Y; Naito S;
J Urol; 2010 Mar; 183(3):952-7. PubMed ID: 20083260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Short-term results after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy compared to open radical prostatectomy.
Wallerstedt A; Tyritzis SI; Thorsteinsdottir T; Carlsson S; Stranne J; Gustafsson O; Hugosson J; Bjartell A; Wilderäng U; Wiklund NP; Steineck G; Haglind E;
Eur Urol; 2015 Apr; 67(4):660-70. PubMed ID: 25308968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robot-assisted or pure laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: what is the optimal procedure for the surgical margins? A single center experience.
Koutlidis N; Mourey E; Champigneulle J; Mangin P; Cormier L
Int J Urol; 2012 Dec; 19(12):1076-81. PubMed ID: 22860572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in the Korean population: a 5-year propensity-score matched comparative analysis versus open radical prostatectomy.
Koo KC; Tuliao P; Yoon YE; Chung BH; Hong SJ; Yang SC; Rha KH
Int J Urol; 2014 Aug; 21(8):781-5. PubMed ID: 24661241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The addition of robotic surgery to an established laparoscopic radical prostatectomy program: effect on positive surgical margins.
Trabulsi EJ; Linden RA; Gomella LG; McGinnis DE; Strup SE; Lallas CD
Can J Urol; 2008 Apr; 15(2):3994-9. PubMed ID: 18405448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The impact of prostate gland weight in robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Link BA; Nelson R; Josephson DY; Yoshida JS; Crocitto LE; Kawachi MH; Wilson TG
J Urol; 2008 Sep; 180(3):928-32. PubMed ID: 18635217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience.
Rozet F; Jaffe J; Braud G; Harmon J; Cathelineau X; Barret E; Vallancien G
J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):478-82. PubMed ID: 17561160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Characteristics of positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy, open retropubic radical prostatectomy, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a comparative histopathologic study from a single academic center.
Albadine R; Hyndman ME; Chaux A; Jeong JY; Saab S; Tavora F; Epstein JI; Gonzalgo ML; Pavlovich CP; Netto GJ
Hum Pathol; 2012 Feb; 43(2):254-60. PubMed ID: 21820147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy is not associated with early postoperative radiation therapy.
Chino J; Schroeck FR; Sun L; Lee WR; Albala DM; Moul JW; Koontz BF
BJU Int; 2009 Nov; 104(10):1496-500. PubMed ID: 19388991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: comparison of short-term biochemical recurrence-free survival.
Barocas DA; Salem S; Kordan Y; Herrell SD; Chang SS; Clark PE; Davis R; Baumgartner R; Phillips S; Cookson MS; Smith JA
J Urol; 2010 Mar; 183(3):990-6. PubMed ID: 20083261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can single positive core prostate cancer at biopsy be considered a low-risk disease after radical prostatectomy?
Ricardo Kupka da S; Dall'Oglio MF; Sant'Ana AC; Pontes J; Srougi M
Int Braz J Urol; 2013; 39(6):800-7. PubMed ID: 24456772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of pathology review of stage and margin status of radical prostatectomy specimens (EORTC trial 22911).
van der Kwast TH; Collette L; Van Poppel H; Van Cangh P; Vekemans K; DaPozzo L; Bosset JF; Kurth KH; Schröder FH; Bolla M;
Virchows Arch; 2006 Oct; 449(4):428-34. PubMed ID: 16941153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term oncological and continence outcomes after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single-centre experience.
Busch J; Stephan C; Herold A; Erber B; Kempkensteffen C; Hinz S; Lein M; Weikert S; Miller K; Magheli A
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt C):E985-90. PubMed ID: 22672442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of length of hospital stay between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.
Nelson B; Kaufman M; Broughton G; Cookson MS; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Baumgartner RG; Smith JA
J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):929-31. PubMed ID: 17296378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Variation between specialist uropatholgists in reporting extraprostatic extension after radical prostatectomy.
Bryant RJ; Schmitt AJ; Roberts IS; Gill PS; Browning L; Brewster SF; Hamdy FC; Verrill C
J Clin Pathol; 2015 Jun; 68(6):465-72. PubMed ID: 25792751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. LAPPRO: a prospective multicentre comparative study of robot-assisted laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
Thorsteinsdottir T; Stranne J; Carlsson S; Anderberg B; Björholt I; Damber JE; Hugosson J; Wilderäng U; Wiklund P; Steineck G; Haglind E
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2011 Mar; 45(2):102-12. PubMed ID: 21114378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Usefulness of the 2005 International Society of Urologic Pathology Gleason grading system in prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.
Uemura H; Hoshino K; Sasaki T; Miyoshi Y; Ishiguro H; Inayama Y; Kubota Y
BJU Int; 2009 May; 103(9):1190-4. PubMed ID: 19076142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
