These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23906418)

  • 1. Interobserver variability in the pathological assessment of radical prostatectomy specimens: findings of the Laparoscopic Prostatectomy Robot Open (LAPPRO) study.
    Persson J; Wilderäng U; Jiborn T; Wiklund PN; Damber JE; Hugosson J; Steineck G; Haglind E; Bjartell A
    Scand J Urol; 2014 Apr; 48(2):160-7. PubMed ID: 23906418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interobserver variability between expert urologic pathologists for extraprostatic extension and surgical margin status in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Evans AJ; Henry PC; Van der Kwast TH; Tkachuk DC; Watson K; Lockwood GA; Fleshner NE; Cheung C; Belanger EC; Amin MB; Boccon-Gibod L; Bostwick DG; Egevad L; Epstein JI; Grignon DJ; Jones EC; Montironi R; Moussa M; Sweet JM; Trpkov K; Wheeler TM; Srigley JR
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2008 Oct; 32(10):1503-12. PubMed ID: 18708939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
    Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
    J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Discrepancy between local and central pathological review of radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Kuroiwa K; Shiraishi T; Ogawa O; Usami M; Hirao Y; Naito S;
    J Urol; 2010 Mar; 183(3):952-7. PubMed ID: 20083260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Short-term results after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy compared to open radical prostatectomy.
    Wallerstedt A; Tyritzis SI; Thorsteinsdottir T; Carlsson S; Stranne J; Gustafsson O; Hugosson J; Bjartell A; Wilderäng U; Wiklund NP; Steineck G; Haglind E;
    Eur Urol; 2015 Apr; 67(4):660-70. PubMed ID: 25308968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robot-assisted or pure laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: what is the optimal procedure for the surgical margins? A single center experience.
    Koutlidis N; Mourey E; Champigneulle J; Mangin P; Cormier L
    Int J Urol; 2012 Dec; 19(12):1076-81. PubMed ID: 22860572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in the Korean population: a 5-year propensity-score matched comparative analysis versus open radical prostatectomy.
    Koo KC; Tuliao P; Yoon YE; Chung BH; Hong SJ; Yang SC; Rha KH
    Int J Urol; 2014 Aug; 21(8):781-5. PubMed ID: 24661241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The addition of robotic surgery to an established laparoscopic radical prostatectomy program: effect on positive surgical margins.
    Trabulsi EJ; Linden RA; Gomella LG; McGinnis DE; Strup SE; Lallas CD
    Can J Urol; 2008 Apr; 15(2):3994-9. PubMed ID: 18405448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of prostate gland weight in robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Link BA; Nelson R; Josephson DY; Yoshida JS; Crocitto LE; Kawachi MH; Wilson TG
    J Urol; 2008 Sep; 180(3):928-32. PubMed ID: 18635217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience.
    Rozet F; Jaffe J; Braud G; Harmon J; Cathelineau X; Barret E; Vallancien G
    J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):478-82. PubMed ID: 17561160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Characteristics of positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy, open retropubic radical prostatectomy, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a comparative histopathologic study from a single academic center.
    Albadine R; Hyndman ME; Chaux A; Jeong JY; Saab S; Tavora F; Epstein JI; Gonzalgo ML; Pavlovich CP; Netto GJ
    Hum Pathol; 2012 Feb; 43(2):254-60. PubMed ID: 21820147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy is not associated with early postoperative radiation therapy.
    Chino J; Schroeck FR; Sun L; Lee WR; Albala DM; Moul JW; Koontz BF
    BJU Int; 2009 Nov; 104(10):1496-500. PubMed ID: 19388991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: comparison of short-term biochemical recurrence-free survival.
    Barocas DA; Salem S; Kordan Y; Herrell SD; Chang SS; Clark PE; Davis R; Baumgartner R; Phillips S; Cookson MS; Smith JA
    J Urol; 2010 Mar; 183(3):990-6. PubMed ID: 20083261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can single positive core prostate cancer at biopsy be considered a low-risk disease after radical prostatectomy?
    Ricardo Kupka da S; Dall'Oglio MF; Sant'Ana AC; Pontes J; Srougi M
    Int Braz J Urol; 2013; 39(6):800-7. PubMed ID: 24456772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of pathology review of stage and margin status of radical prostatectomy specimens (EORTC trial 22911).
    van der Kwast TH; Collette L; Van Poppel H; Van Cangh P; Vekemans K; DaPozzo L; Bosset JF; Kurth KH; Schröder FH; Bolla M;
    Virchows Arch; 2006 Oct; 449(4):428-34. PubMed ID: 16941153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-term oncological and continence outcomes after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single-centre experience.
    Busch J; Stephan C; Herold A; Erber B; Kempkensteffen C; Hinz S; Lein M; Weikert S; Miller K; Magheli A
    BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt C):E985-90. PubMed ID: 22672442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of length of hospital stay between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.
    Nelson B; Kaufman M; Broughton G; Cookson MS; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Baumgartner RG; Smith JA
    J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):929-31. PubMed ID: 17296378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Discrepancies in Gleason score between needle core biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens with correlation between clinical and pathological staging.
    Singh V; Sharma K; Singh M; Tripathi SS; Bhirud DP; Jena R; Navriya SC; Choudhary GR; Sandhu AS
    Urologia; 2024 Aug; 91(3):518-524. PubMed ID: 38578052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Variation between specialist uropatholgists in reporting extraprostatic extension after radical prostatectomy.
    Bryant RJ; Schmitt AJ; Roberts IS; Gill PS; Browning L; Brewster SF; Hamdy FC; Verrill C
    J Clin Pathol; 2015 Jun; 68(6):465-72. PubMed ID: 25792751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. LAPPRO: a prospective multicentre comparative study of robot-assisted laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
    Thorsteinsdottir T; Stranne J; Carlsson S; Anderberg B; Björholt I; Damber JE; Hugosson J; Wilderäng U; Wiklund P; Steineck G; Haglind E
    Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2011 Mar; 45(2):102-12. PubMed ID: 21114378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.