These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23906418)

  • 21. Usefulness of the 2005 International Society of Urologic Pathology Gleason grading system in prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Uemura H; Hoshino K; Sasaki T; Miyoshi Y; Ishiguro H; Inayama Y; Kubota Y
    BJU Int; 2009 May; 103(9):1190-4. PubMed ID: 19076142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The surgical approach can be determined from the pathological specimen obtained after open or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Drouin SJ; Comperat E; Varinot J; Vaessen C; Bitker MO; Chartier-Kastler E; Mozer P; Shariat SF; Cussenot O; Rouprêt M
    World J Urol; 2014 Apr; 32(2):489-93. PubMed ID: 23723015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Clinical significance of benign glands at surgical margins in robotic radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Kohl SK; Balaji KC; Smith LM; Wilson NP; Johansson SL; Sterrett SP; Abrahams NA
    Urology; 2007 Jun; 69(6):1112-6. PubMed ID: 17572197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Concordance between biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen Gleason score in internal and external pathology facilities.
    Grasso AA; Cozzi G; Palumbo C; Albo G; Rocco B
    Anticancer Res; 2014 Oct; 34(10):5585-8. PubMed ID: 25275059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Predictors of positive surgical margins after laparoscopic robot assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Ficarra V; Novara G; Secco S; D'Elia C; Boscolo-Berto R; Gardiman M; Cavalleri S; Artibani W
    J Urol; 2009 Dec; 182(6):2682-8. PubMed ID: 19836778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Gleason score concordance on biopsy-confirmed prostate cancer: is pathological re-evaluation necessary prior to radical prostatectomy?
    Truesdale MD; Cheetham PJ; Turk AT; Sartori S; Hruby GW; Dinneen EP; Benson MC; Badani KK
    BJU Int; 2011 Mar; 107(5):749-754. PubMed ID: 20840549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Is active surveillance a safe alternative in the management of localized prostate cancer? Pathological features of radical prostatectomy specimens in potential candidates for active surveillance.
    Norman Z; Militza P; Andres F; Daniela F; Alejandro M; Catherine S; Juan F
    Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(2):154-9. PubMed ID: 24856482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Gleason grading of prostate cancer in needle biopsies or radical prostatectomy specimens: contemporary approach, current clinical significance and sources of pathology discrepancies.
    Montironi R; Mazzuccheli R; Scarpelli M; Lopez-Beltran A; Fellegara G; Algaba F
    BJU Int; 2005 Jun; 95(8):1146-52. PubMed ID: 15877724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Prostate needle biopsies: interobserver variation and clinical consequences of histopathological re-evaluation.
    Berg KD; Toft BG; Røder MA; Brasso K; Vainer B; Iversen P
    APMIS; 2011 Apr; 119(4-5):239-46. PubMed ID: 21492223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The value of second-opinion pathology diagnoses on prostate biopsies from patients referred for management of prostate cancer.
    Barqawi AB; Turcanu R; Gamito EJ; Lucia SM; O'Donnell CI; Crawford ED; La Rosa DD; La Rosa FG
    Int J Clin Exp Pathol; 2011 Jun; 4(5):468-75. PubMed ID: 21738818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Prognostic value of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Kimura K; Tsuzuki T; Kato M; Saito AM; Sassa N; Ishida R; Hirabayashi H; Yoshino Y; Hattori R; Gotoh M
    Prostate; 2014 May; 74(6):680-7. PubMed ID: 24481730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Pitfalls of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a comparison of positive surgical margins between robotic and laparoscopic surgery.
    Tozawa K; Yasui T; Umemoto Y; Mizuno K; Okada A; Kawai N; Takahashi S; Kohri K
    Int J Urol; 2014 Oct; 21(10):976-9. PubMed ID: 24912809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Trends in Gleason score: concordance between biopsy and prostatectomy over 15 years.
    Rajinikanth A; Manoharan M; Soloway CT; Civantos FJ; Soloway MS
    Urology; 2008 Jul; 72(1):177-82. PubMed ID: 18279938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Correlation between the preoperative serum prostate specific antigen, Gleason score, and clinical staging with pathological outcome following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: an Indian experience.
    Singh P; Dogra PN; Gupta NP; Nayyar R; Seth A; Javali TD; Kumar R
    Indian J Cancer; 2011; 48(4):483-7. PubMed ID: 22293265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination (NeuroSAFE) increases nerve-sparing frequency and reduces positive surgical margins in open and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: experience after 11,069 consecutive patients.
    Schlomm T; Tennstedt P; Huxhold C; Steuber T; Salomon G; Michl U; Heinzer H; Hansen J; Budäus L; Steurer S; Wittmer C; Minner S; Haese A; Sauter G; Graefen M; Huland H
    Eur Urol; 2012 Aug; 62(2):333-40. PubMed ID: 22591631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Open vs. robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon and pathologist comparison of pathologic and oncologic outcomes.
    Masterson TA; Cheng L; Boris RS; Koch MO
    Urol Oncol; 2013 Oct; 31(7):1043-8. PubMed ID: 22222059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Favorable risk factors in patients with positive surgical margin after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Ha YS; Kang DI; Kim JH; Joung JY; Yu J; Parihar JS; Salmasi AH; Horie S; Kim WJ; Yi Kim I
    Can J Urol; 2014 Jun; 21(3):7290-7. PubMed ID: 24978359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Localized prostate cancer and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a retrospective, comparative study between pre- and post-operative Gleason scores.
    Henderickx MMEL; Brits T; Muilwijk T; Adams T; Vandeursen H
    Acta Chir Belg; 2018 Feb; 118(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 28720050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of prostate-specific antigen recurrence-free survival in a contemporary cohort of patients undergoing either radical retropubic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Schroeck FR; Sun L; Freedland SJ; Albala DM; Mouraviev V; Polascik TJ; Moul JW
    BJU Int; 2008 Jul; 102(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 18384634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. How significant is upgrade in Gleason score between prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology while discussing less invasive treatment options?
    Suer E; Gokce MI; Gulpinar O; Guclu AG; Haciyev P; Gogus C; Turkolmez K; Baltaci S
    Scand J Urol; 2014 Apr; 48(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 23941315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.