BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23907086)

  • 1. Comparison of enamel discoloration associated with bonding with three different orthodontic adhesives and cleaning-up with four different procedures.
    Ye C; Zhao Z; Zhao Q; Du X; Ye J; Wei X
    J Dent; 2013 Nov; 41 Suppl 5():e35-40. PubMed ID: 23907086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Comparative study of enamel discoloration related to bonding with different orthodontic adhesives and cleaning-up with different procedures].
    Wu HM; Ye C; Chen D
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2018 Jun; 27(3):257-260. PubMed ID: 30411119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of different orthodontic adhesives and resin removal techniques on enamel color alteration.
    Boncuk Y; Cehreli ZC; Polat-Özsoy Ö
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Jul; 84(4):634-41. PubMed ID: 24313735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding.
    Millett DT; Cattanach D; McFadzean R; Pattison J; McColl J
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):58-63; discussion 64. PubMed ID: 10022186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study.
    Shammaa I; Ngan P; Kim H; Kao E; Gladwin M; Gunel E; Brown C
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 10515145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Enamel loss at bond-up, debond and clean-up following the use of a conventional light-cured composite and a resin-modified glass polyalkenoate cement.
    Ireland AJ; Hosein I; Sherriff M
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Aug; 27(4):413-9. PubMed ID: 16043478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Enamel loss and adhesive remnants following bracket removal and various clean-up procedures in vitro.
    Ryf S; Flury S; Palaniappan S; Lussi A; van Meerbeek B; Zimmerli B
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 21228118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Demineralization around orthodontic brackets bonded with resin-modified glass ionomer cement and fluoride-releasing resin composite.
    Wilson RM; Donly KJ
    Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(3):255-9. PubMed ID: 11447960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Orthodontic bracket bonding with a plasma-arc light and resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement.
    Ishikawa H; Komori A; Kojima I; Ando F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jul; 120(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 11455379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Enamel colour changes at debonding and after finishing procedures using five different adhesives.
    Trakyali G; Ozdemir FI; Arun T
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):397-401. PubMed ID: 19460855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vivo effect of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement on enamel demineralization around orthodontic brackets.
    Pascotto RC; Navarro MF; Capelozza Filho L; Cury JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Jan; 125(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 14718877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Enamel gloss changes induced by orthodontic bonding.
    Sifakakis I; Zinelis S; Eliades G; Koletsi D; Eliades T
    J Orthod; 2018 Dec; 45(4):269-274. PubMed ID: 30392447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of shear bond strengths of three visible light-cured orthodontic adhesives.
    Owens SE; Miller BH
    Angle Orthod; 2000 Oct; 70(5):352-6. PubMed ID: 11036994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of light-cured filled sealant on shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
    Varlik SK; Ulusoy C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Feb; 135(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 19201326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fluoride release from an orthodontic glass ionomer adhesive in vitro and enamel fluoride uptake in vivo.
    Chatzistavrou E; Eliades T; Zinelis S; Athanasiou AE; Eliades G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):458.e1-8; discussion 458-9. PubMed ID: 20362902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative assessment of light-cured resin-modified glass ionomer and composite resin adhesives: in vitro study of a new adhesive system.
    Newman GV; Newman RA; Sengupta AK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Mar; 119(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 11244420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. New generation of color bonding: a comparative in vitro study.
    Maurya R; Tripathi T; Rai P
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(5):733-4. PubMed ID: 22406729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bond strength of orthodontic brackets using different light and self-curing cements.
    Toledano M; Osorio R; Osorio E; Romeo A; de la Higuera B; García-Godoy F
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Feb; 73(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 12607856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fluoride release capacities of four different orthodontic adhesives.
    Evrenol BI; Kucukkeles N; Arun T; Yarat A
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(4):315-9. PubMed ID: 10551131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Shear bond strength of porcelain laminate veneers to enamel, dentine and enamel-dentine complex bonded with different adhesive luting systems.
    Öztürk E; Bolay Ş; Hickel R; Ilie N
    J Dent; 2013 Feb; 41(2):97-105. PubMed ID: 22521701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.