These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23907170)

  • 1. Comparing non contrast computerized tomography criteria versus dual X-ray absorptiometry as predictors of radio-opaque upper urinary tract stone fragmentation after electromagnetic shockwave lithotripsy.
    Hameed DA; Elgammal MA; ElGanainy EO; Hageb A; Mohammed K; El-Taher AM; Mostafa MM; Ahmed AI
    Urolithiasis; 2013 Nov; 41(6):511-5. PubMed ID: 23907170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A prospective multivariate analysis of factors predicting stone disintegration by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: the value of high-resolution noncontrast computed tomography.
    El-Nahas AR; El-Assmy AM; Mansour O; Sheir KZ
    Eur Urol; 2007 Jun; 51(6):1688-93; discussion 1693-4. PubMed ID: 17161522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Prospective Evaluation of High-Resolution CT Parameters in Predicting Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Success for Upper Urinary Tract Calculi.
    Abdelhamid M; Mosharafa AA; Ibrahim H; Selim HM; Hamed M; Elghoneimy MN; Salem HK; Abdelazim MS; Badawy H
    J Endourol; 2016 Nov; 30(11):1227-1232. PubMed ID: 27597174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prediction of fragility of urinary calculi by dual X-ray absorptiometry.
    Mandhani A; Raghavendran M; Srivastava A; Kapoor R; Singh U; Kumar A; Bhandari M
    J Urol; 2003 Oct; 170(4 Pt 1):1097-100. PubMed ID: 14501700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Shock wave lithotripsy success determined by skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography.
    Pareek G; Hedican SP; Lee FT; Nakada SY
    Urology; 2005 Nov; 66(5):941-4. PubMed ID: 16286099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Advanced non-contrasted computed tomography post-processing by CT-Calculometry (CT-CM) outperforms established predictors for the outcome of shock wave lithotripsy.
    Langenauer J; Betschart P; Hechelhammer L; Güsewell S; Schmid HP; Engeler DS; Abt D; Zumstein V
    World J Urol; 2018 Dec; 36(12):2073-2080. PubMed ID: 29845319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of computed tomography findings for success prediction after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for urinary tract stone disease.
    Celik S; Bozkurt O; Kaya FG; Egriboyun S; Demir O; Secil M; Celebi I
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2015 Jan; 47(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 25311505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating the importance of mean stone density and skin-to-stone distance in predicting successful shock wave lithotripsy of renal and ureteric calculi.
    Wiesenthal JD; Ghiculete D; D'A Honey RJ; Pace KT
    Urol Res; 2010 Aug; 38(4):307-13. PubMed ID: 20625891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Predictive Role of Abdominal Fat Parameters and Stone Density on SWL Outcomes.
    Kaya C; Kaynak Y; Karabag A; Aykaç A
    Curr Med Imaging Rev; 2020; 16(1):80-87. PubMed ID: 31989897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How do stone attenuation and skin-to-stone distance in computed tomography influence the performance of shock wave lithotripsy in ureteral stone disease?
    Müllhaupt G; Engeler DS; Schmid HP; Abt D
    BMC Urol; 2015 Jul; 15():72. PubMed ID: 26201514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stone attenuation and skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography predicts for stone fragmentation by shock wave lithotripsy.
    Perks AE; Schuler TD; Lee J; Ghiculete D; Chung DG; D'A Honey RJ; Pace KT
    Urology; 2008 Oct; 72(4):765-9. PubMed ID: 18674803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Simple and practical nomograms for predicting the stone-free rate after shock wave lithotripsy in patients with a solitary upper ureteral stone.
    Niwa N; Matsumoto K; Miyahara M; Omura M; Kobayashi H; Kikuchi E; Miyajima A; Miyata K; Oya M
    World J Urol; 2017 Sep; 35(9):1455-1461. PubMed ID: 28220189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Renal Stone Features Are More Important Than Renal Anatomy to Predict Shock Wave Lithotripsy Outcomes: Results from a Prospective Study with CT Follow-Up.
    Torricelli FCM; Monga M; Yamauchi FI; Marchini GS; Danilovic A; Vicentini FC; Batagello CA; Srougi M; Nahas WC; Mazzucchi E
    J Endourol; 2020 Jan; 34(1):63-67. PubMed ID: 31595801
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Shockwave Lithotripsy Is an Efficacious Treatment Modality for Obese Patients with Upper Ureteral Calculi: Logistic Regression and Matched-Pair Analyses from a Dedicated Center Comparing Treatment Outcomes by Skin-to-Stone Distance.
    Mains EAA; Blackmur JP; Sharma AD; Gietzmann WK; El-Mokadem I; Stephenson C; Wallace S; Phipps S; Thomas BG; Tolley DA; Cutress ML
    J Endourol; 2020 Apr; 34(4):487-494. PubMed ID: 32030994
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Role of Hounsfield Unit in Predicting Outcomes of Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Renal Calculi: Outcomes of a Systematic Review.
    Garg M; Johnson H; Lee SM; Rai BP; Somani B; Philip J
    Curr Urol Rep; 2023 Apr; 24(4):173-185. PubMed ID: 36802317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stone measurement by volumetric three-dimensional computed tomography for predicting the outcome after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
    Bandi G; Meiners RJ; Pickhardt PJ; Nakada SY
    BJU Int; 2009 Feb; 103(4):524-8. PubMed ID: 19007365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A 970 Hounsfield units (HU) threshold of kidney stone density on non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) improves patients' selection for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL): evidence from a prospective study.
    Ouzaid I; Al-qahtani S; Dominique S; Hupertan V; Fernandez P; Hermieu JF; Delmas V; Ravery V
    BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt B):E438-42. PubMed ID: 22372937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A new nomogram for prediction of outcome of pediatric shock-wave lithotripsy.
    Dogan HS; Altan M; Citamak B; Bozaci AC; Karabulut E; Tekgul S
    J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Apr; 11(2):84.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25812469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using a three-dimensional computer assisted stone volume estimates to evaluate extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy treatment of kidney stones.
    Bigum LH; Ulriksen PS; Omar OS
    Urolithiasis; 2016 Oct; 44(5):451-7. PubMed ID: 26914829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can shear wave elastography predict the success of shock‑wave lithotripsy used in renal stones treatment? A prospective study.
    Samir M; Galaleldine A; El-Zayat T; Eldin ND; Mahmoud MA; Mostafa D
    World J Urol; 2024 Mar; 42(1):160. PubMed ID: 38488885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.